Citibank 2013 Annual Report Download - page 290

272
position. The Company applies market valuation adjustments, including
adjustments to account for the size of the net open risk position, consistent
with market participant assumptions and in accordance with the unit
of account.
Valuation Process for Fair Value Measurements
Price verification procedures and related internal control procedures are
governed by the Citigroup Pricing and Price Verification Policy and
Standards, which is jointly owned by Finance and Risk Management.
Finance has implemented the ICG Securities and Banking Pricing and
Price Verification Standards and Procedures to facilitate compliance with
this policy.
For fair value measurements of substantially all assets and liabilities
held by the Company, individual business units are responsible for valuing
the trading account assets and liabilities, and Product Control within
Finance performs independent price verification procedures to evaluate
those fair value measurements. Product Control is independent of the
individual business units and reports to the Global Head of Product Control.
It has authority over the valuation of financial assets and liabilities. Fair
value measurements of assets and liabilities are determined using various
techniques, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flows and internal
models, such as option and correlation models.
Based on the observability of inputs used, Product Control classifies the
inventory฀as฀Level฀1,฀Level฀2฀or฀Level฀3฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀hierarchy.฀When฀
a position involves one or more significant inputs that are not directly
observable, additional price verification procedures are applied. These
procedures may include reviewing relevant historical data, analyzing profit
and loss, valuing each component of a structured trade individually, and
benchmarking, among others.
Reports฀of฀inventory฀that฀is฀classified฀within฀Level฀3฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀
hierarchy are distributed to senior management in Finance, Risk and the
individual business. This inventory is also discussed in Risk Committees and
in monthly meetings with senior trading management. As deemed necessary,
reports may go to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors or to the
full Board of Directors. Whenever a valuation adjustment is needed to bring
the price of an asset or liability to its exit price, Product Control reports it to
management along with other price verification results.
In addition, the pricing models used in measuring fair value are governed
by an independent control framework. Although the models are developed
and tested by the individual business units, they are independently validated
by฀the฀Model฀Validation฀Group฀within฀Risk฀Management฀and฀reviewed฀by฀
Finance with respect to their impact on the price verification procedures. The
purpose of this independent control framework is to assess model risk arising
from models’ theoretical soundness, calibration techniques where needed,
and the appropriateness of the model for a specific product in a defined
market.฀Valuation฀adjustments,฀if฀any,฀go฀through฀a฀similar฀independent฀
review process as the valuation models. To ensure their continued
applicability, models are independently reviewed annually. In addition,
Risk Management approves and maintains a list of products permitted to be
valued under each approved model for a given business.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and
securities sold under agreements to repurchase
No quoted prices exist for such instruments, so fair value is determined using
a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the
terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other
features. Expected cash flows are discounted using interest rates appropriate
to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature of the underlying
collateral. Generally, when such instruments are held at fair value, they are
classified฀within฀Level฀2฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀hierarchy,฀as฀the฀inputs฀used฀in฀the฀
valuation are readily observable. However, certain long-dated positions are
classified฀within฀Level฀3฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀hierarchy.
Trading account assets and liabilities—trading securities
and trading loans
When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the
fair฀value฀of฀trading฀securities;฀such฀items฀are฀classified฀as฀Level฀1฀of฀the฀
fair value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and
exchange-traded equity securities.
For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the
Company generally determines fair value utilizing valuation techniques,
including discounted cash flows, price-based and internal models, such
as Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. Fair value estimates from
these internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices
obtained฀from฀independent฀vendors.฀Vendors฀compile฀prices฀from฀various฀
sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no
price is observable. A price-based methodology utilizes, where available,
quoted prices or other market information obtained from recent trading
activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued.
The yields used in discounted cash flow models are derived from the same
price information. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods
are฀generally฀classified฀as฀Level฀2.฀However,฀when฀less฀liquidity฀exists฀for฀a฀
security or loan, a quoted price is stale, a significant adjustment to the price
of a similar security or loan is necessary to reflect differences in the terms of
the actual security or loan being valued, or prices from independent sources
are insufficient to corroborate valuation, a loan or security is generally
classified฀as฀Level฀3.฀The฀price฀input฀used฀in฀a฀price-based฀methodology฀may฀
be zero for a security, such as a subprime CDO, that is not receiving any
principal or interest and is currently written down to zero.
Where the Company’s principal market for a portfolio of loans is the
securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine
the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from
the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market,
adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction
costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and
liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in
certain securitization markets since the second half of 2007, observable
securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans
have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are
generally฀classified฀as฀Level฀3฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀hierarchy.฀However,฀for฀other฀
loan securitization markets, such as commercial real estate loans, price
verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these
markets have remained active. Accordingly, this loan portfolio is classified as
Level฀2฀of฀the฀fair฀value฀hierarchy.