Citibank 2010 Annual Report Download - page 213

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 213 of the 2010 Citibank annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 312

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • 218
  • 219
  • 220
  • 221
  • 222
  • 223
  • 224
  • 225
  • 226
  • 227
  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • 236
  • 237
  • 238
  • 239
  • 240
  • 241
  • 242
  • 243
  • 244
  • 245
  • 246
  • 247
  • 248
  • 249
  • 250
  • 251
  • 252
  • 253
  • 254
  • 255
  • 256
  • 257
  • 258
  • 259
  • 260
  • 261
  • 262
  • 263
  • 264
  • 265
  • 266
  • 267
  • 268
  • 269
  • 270
  • 271
  • 272
  • 273
  • 274
  • 275
  • 276
  • 277
  • 278
  • 279
  • 280
  • 281
  • 282
  • 283
  • 284
  • 285
  • 286
  • 287
  • 288
  • 289
  • 290
  • 291
  • 292
  • 293
  • 294
  • 295
  • 296
  • 297
  • 298
  • 299
  • 300
  • 301
  • 302
  • 303
  • 304
  • 305
  • 306
  • 307
  • 308
  • 309
  • 310
  • 311
  • 312

211
Evaluating Investments for Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities
with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than
temporary. Prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant
to FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-
Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments
(now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35, Investments—Debt and Equity
Securities—Subsequent Measurement). Any unrealized loss identified as
other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement
of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 (now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35-34, Investments—Debt
and Equity Securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment). This guidance amends the impairment model for debt
securities; the impairment model for equity securities was not affected.
Under the guidance for debt securities, other-than-temporary impairment
(OTTI) is recognized in earnings for debt securities that the Company has an
intent to sell or that the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that it
will be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. For those
securities that the Company does not intend to sell or expect to be required to
sell, credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings, with the non-credit-
related impairment recorded in AOCI.
An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual
security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are
determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for
AFS securities, while such losses related to HTM securities are not recorded,
as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities
transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost is defined
as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion
income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to
transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined
as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization
of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in
earnings subsequent to transfer.
Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the
Company has assessed each position for impairment.
Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:
the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost; •฀
the severity of the impairment; •฀
the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term •฀
prospects of the issuer;
activity in the market of the issuer that may indicate adverse credit •฀
conditions; and
the Company’s ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of •฀
time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.
The Company’s review for impairment generally entails:
identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of •฀
possible impairment;
analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than •฀
amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the
investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected
recovery period;
discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or •฀
triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having
other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support
other-than-temporary impairment; and
documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business •฀
policies.
For equity securities, management considers the various factors described
above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a
period of time sufficient for recovery to cost. Where management lacks that
intent or ability, the security’s decline in fair value is deemed to be other
than temporary and is recorded in earnings. AFS equity securities deemed
other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full
difference between fair value and cost recognized in earnings.
For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired,
management assesses whether it intends to sell or whether it is more-likely-
than-not that it would be required to sell the investment before the expected
recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted
that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is not likely to be required to
sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an
assertion has not been made, the security’s decline in fair value is deemed to
be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.
For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for OTTI is
the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not
expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost
basis of the security. For securities purchased and classified as AFS with the
expectation of receiving full principal and interest cash flows as of the date of
purchase, this analysis considers the likelihood of receiving all contractual
principal and interest. For securities reclassified out of the trading category in
the fourth quarter of 2008, the analysis considers the likelihood of receiving
the expected principal and interest cash flows anticipated as of the date of
reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The extent of the Company’s
analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the
analysis have been refined for securities where the current fair value or other
characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the
Company’s process for identifying credit impairment in security types with
the most significant unrealized losses as of December 31, 2010.