Sallie Mae 2006 Annual Report Download - page 54

currency exchange rate volatility, changing credit spreads and changes in our stock price during the period as
well as the volume and term of derivatives not receiving hedge treatment.
Our Floor Income Contracts are written options that must meet more stringent requirements than other
hedging relationships to achieve hedge effectiveness under SFAS No. 133. Specifically, our Floor Income
Contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment because the paydown of principal of the student loans
underlying the Floor Income embedded in those student loans does not exactly match the change in the
notional amount of our written Floor Income Contracts. Under SFAS No. 133, the upfront payment is deemed
a liability and changes in fair value are recorded through income throughout the life of the contract. The
change in the value of Floor Income Contracts is primarily caused by changing interest rates that cause the
amount of Floor Income earned on the underlying student loans and paid to the counterparties to vary. This is
economically offset by the change in value of the student loan portfolio, including our Retained Interests,
earning Floor Income but that offsetting change in value is not recognized under SFAS No. 133. We believe
the Floor Income Contracts are economic hedges because they effectively fix the amount of Floor Income
earned over the contract period, thus eliminating the timing and uncertainty that changes in interest rates can
have on Floor Income for that period. Prior to SFAS No. 133, we accounted for Floor Income Contracts as
hedges and amortized the upfront cash compensation ratably over the lives of the contracts.
Basis swaps are used to convert floating rate debt from one floating interest rate index to another to better
match the interest rate characteristics of the assets financed by that debt. We primarily use basis swaps to
change the index of our floating rate debt to better match the cash flows of our student loan assets that are
primarily indexed to a commercial paper, Prime or Treasury bill index. In addition, we use basis swaps to
convert debt indexed to the Consumer Price Index to 3 month LIBOR debt. SFAS No. 133 requires that when
using basis swaps, the change in the cash flows of the hedge effectively offset both the change in the cash
flows of the asset and the change in the cash flows of the liability. Our basis swaps hedge variable interest rate
risk, however they generally do not meet this effectiveness test because most of our FFELP student loans can
earn at either a variable or a fixed interest rate depending on market interest rates. We also have basis swaps
that do not meet the SFAS No. 133 effectiveness test that economically hedge off-balance sheet instruments.
As a result, under GAAP these swaps are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected currently
in the income statement.
Under SFAS No. 150, equity forward contracts that allow a net settlement option either in cash or the
Company’s stock are required to be accounted for as derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133. As a
result, we account for our equity forward contracts as derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133 and mark
them to market through earnings. They do not qualify as effective SFAS No. 133 hedges, as a requirement to
achieve hedge accounting is the hedged item must impact net income and the settlement of these contracts
through the purchase of our own stock does not impact net income.
The table below quantifies the adjustments for derivative accounting under SFAS No. 133 on our net
income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, when compared with the accounting
principles employed in all years prior to the SFAS No. 133 implementation.
2006 2005 2004
Years Ended December 31,
“Core Earnings” derivative adjustments:
Gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net, included in other
income
(1)
............................................... $(339) $247 $ 849
Less: Realized losses on derivative and hedging activities, net
(1)
........ 109 387 713
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities, net ....... (230) 634 1,562
Other pre-SFAS No. 133 accounting adjustments ................... 1 3 (9)
Total net impact of SFAS No. 133 derivative accounting.............. $(229) $637 $1,553
(1)
See “Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) on Derivative and Hedging Activities” below for a detailed breakdown of the
components of realized losses on derivative and hedging activities.
53