Capital One 2006 Annual Report Download - page 58

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 58 of the 2006 Capital One annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 148

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148

40
Net Charge-Offs
Net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses (excluding accrued and unpaid finance charges and fees and fraud
losses) less current period principal recoveries. The Company charges off credit card loans at 180 days past the due date and
generally charges off other consumer loans at 120 days past the due date or upon repossession of collateral. Non-
collateralized consumer bankruptcies are typically charged-off within 2-7 days upon notification and in any event within 30
days. Commercial loans are charged-off when the amounts are deemed uncollectible. Costs to recover previously charged-off
accounts are recorded as collection expenses in other non-interest expense.
The reported and managed net charge-off rates decreased 134 and 141 basis points, respectively, with net charge-off dollars
decreasing 1% on a reported and managed basis, for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the prior year. The
decrease in net charge-off rates is due to historically low levels of bankruptcies following the change in bankruptcy
legislation in the fourth quarter of 2005 and an increase in the concentration of higher credit quality loans in the reported loan
portfolio driven by recent acquisitions.
The reported and managed net charge-off rates decreased 23 and 16 basis points, respectively, while net charge-off dollars
increased 12% and 11% on a reported and managed basis, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
the prior year. The decrease in net charge-off rates principally relates to the Companys continued asset diversification within
and beyond U.S. consumer credit cards. The increase in the net charge-off dollars was driven by growth in the reported and
managed loan portfolios combined with the incremental increase of bankruptcy charge-offs resulting from the enactment of
the new bankruptcy legislation. Reported and managed bankruptcy charge-offs increased $146.8 million and $394.8 million,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005 when compared to the prior year.
For additional information, see section XII, Tabular Summary, Table F (Net Charge-offs).
Nonperforming Assets
The Company assumed nonperforming assets in connection with the acquisitions of Hibernia and North Fork.
Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual loans (loans on which interest income is not currently recognized) and
restructured loans (loans with below-market interest rates or other concessions due to the deteriorated financial condition of
the borrower). Commercial, small business and some auto loans are placed in nonaccrual status at 90 days past due or sooner
if, in managements opinion, there is doubt concerning the ability to fully collect both principal and interest.
For additional information, see section XII, Tabular Summary, Table G (Nonperforming Assets).
Allowance for loan and lease losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at the amount estimated to be sufficient to absorb probable principal
losses, net of principal recoveries (including recovery of collateral), inherent in the existing reported loan portfolios. The
provision for loan losses is the periodic cost of maintaining an adequate allowance. The amount of allowance necessary is
based on distinct allowance methodologies depending on the type of loans which include specifically identified criticized
loans, migration analysis, forward loss curves and historical loss trends. In evaluating the sufficiency of the allowance for
loan and lease losses, management takes into consideration the following factors: recent trends in delinquencies and charge-
offs including bankrupt, deceased and recovered amounts; forecasting uncertainties and size of credit risks; the degree of risk
inherent in the composition of the loan portfolio; economic conditions; legal and regulatory guidance; credit evaluations and
underwriting policies; seasonality; and the value of collateral supporting the loans. To the extent credit experience is not
indicative of future performance or other assumptions used by management do not prevail, loss experience could differ
significantly, resulting in either higher or lower future provision for loan and lease losses, as applicable. The evaluation
process for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the periodic provisioning for estimated losses is
undertaken on a quarterly basis, but may increase in frequency should conditions arise that would require the Companys
prompt attention. Conditions giving rise to such action are business combinations or other acquisitions or dispositions of
large quantities of loans, dispositions of non-performing and marginally performing loans by bulk sale or any development
which may indicate an adverse trend.
The allowance for loan losses increased $390.0 million from December 31, 2005 driven primarily by the acquisition of North
Fork which added $222.2 million of allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2006. The remaining increase was the result
of 8% growth in the reported loan portfolio, exclusive of the North Fork loans portfolio.
During 2006, the Company determined that $25.7 million of allowance for loan losses previously established by Hibernia to
cover expected losses in the portion of the loan portfolio impacted by the 2005 hurricanes was no longer needed. This
determination was driven by improvements in credit performance of the impacted portfolios since the time those reserves