Kodak 2006 Annual Report Download - page 110

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 110 of the 2006 Kodak annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 236

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • 218
  • 219
  • 220
  • 221
  • 222
  • 223
  • 224
  • 225
  • 226
  • 227
  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • 233
  • 234
  • 235
  • 236

0
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation amounts as of the end of the year for all major funded and unfunded U.S.
and Non-U.S. defined benefit plans were as follows:
2006 2005
U.S. Non-U.S. U.S. Non-U.S.
Discount rate 5.99% 5.00% 5.51% 4.51%
Salary increase rate 4.55% 3.20% 4.58% 3.67%
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net pension (income) expense for all the major funded and unfunded U.S. and Non-U.S. defined
benefit plans were as follows:
2006 2005
U.S. Non-U.S. U.S. Non-U.S.
Discount rate 5.98% 4.78% 5.57% 4.85%
Salary increase rate 4.58% 3.67% 4.33% 3.29%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 8.60% 7.99% 9.00% 8.12%
Of the total plan assets attributable to the major U.S. defined benefit plans at December 31, 2006 and 2005, 98% relate to the KRIP plan. The
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption (EROA) is determined from the plan’s asset allocation using forward-looking assump-
tions in the context of historical returns, correlations and volatilities. The investment strategy underlying the asset allocation is to manage the assets of
the U.S. plans to provide for the long-term liabilities while maintaining sufficient liquidity to pay current benets. This is primarily achieved by holding
equity-like investments while investing a portion of the assets in long duration bonds in order to provide for benets included in the projected benefit
obligation. The Company undertakes an asset and liability modeling study once every three years or when there are material changes in the composi-
tion of the plan liability or capital markets. The Company completed its most recent study in 2005, which supports the EROA of 9%.
The expected return on plan assets for the major non-U.S. pension plans range from 3.74% to 9.00% for 2006. Every three years or when market
conditions have changed materially, the Company will undertake new asset and liability modeling studies for each of its larger pension plans. The
asset allocations and expected return on plan assets are individually set to provide for benefits included in the projected benet obligation within each
countrys legal investment constraints. The investment strategy is to manage the assets of the non-U.S. plans to provide for the long-term liabilities
while maintaining sufcient liquidity to pay current benets. This is primarily achieved by holding equity-like investments while investing a portion of
the assets in long duration bonds in order to partially match the long-term nature of the liabilities.
The Company’s weighted-average asset allocations for its major U.S. defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2006 and 2005, by asset cat-
egory, are as follows:
Asset Category 2006 2005 Target
Equity securities 42% 42% 32%-42%
Debt securities 30% 31% 29%-34%
Real estate 5% 5% 3%-13%
Other 23% 22% 19%-29%
Total 100% 100%