IBM 2005 Annual Report Download - page 92
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 92 of the 2005 IBM annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.NotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements
INTERNATIONALBUSINESSMACHINESCORPORATION ANDSUBSIDIARYCOMPANIES
_91
InDecember2005,thecompanyapproved amendments
to the PPP and the SERP which provided that active partici-
pantswillnolongeraccruebenefitsunderthese plans effec-
tive December31,2007.Asaresultofthisaction,thecompany
recordedacurtailmentchargeofapproximately$267millionin
the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2005. In addition, the company recorded a
reductionin thePBObalances ofapproximately$775million
and $13 million at December 31, 2005 for the PPP and the
SERP,respectively.
Inaddition,inDecember2005,thecompanyamendedthe
IBMJapanPensionPlan,whichthecompanyconsidersoneof
itsmaterialnon-U.S.pension plans.Thisamendmentmodified
certainplantermsincludingachangeinthemethodofcalculat-
ingbenefitsforcertainparticipantsatDecember31,2005.This
amendmentdidnot impact netperiodiccost/(income),however,
theamendmentresultedina$561 millionreductiontothePBO
asofDecember31,2005.
The overall change in the Net prepaid pension asset bal-
ance from 2004 to 2005 of approximately $500 million was
causedbyanincreasein the prepaidpensionassetrelatedto
thePPPasofDecember31,2005, principallydueto a $1.7bil-
lioncontributionmadebythecompanyinJanuary2005which
increasedthefairvalueofplanassets.Inaddition,aportionof
theoverallincreaseintheprepaidpensionassetinthePPPwas
drivenbythereductionofthePBOasaresultofthe planamend-
mentthatcaused the curtailmentcharge previously discussed.
The reduction in the material non-U.S. plan prepaid pension
assetwasdrivenprincipallybythereductioninthePBOrelated
totheamendmentsmadetotheIBMJapanPensionPlan. The
increaseinthecompany’sPrepaidpensionassetbalancefrom
2003 to 2004 was primarily due to a $700 million contribution
madebythecompanytothePPPduring2004.
ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE PLAN
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Underlying both the calculation of the PBO and net periodic
cost/(income)areactuarialvaluations.Thesevaluationsusepar-
ticipant-specific information such as salary, age and years of
service,as well as certain assumptions, themostsignificant of
which include: estimates of discount rates, expected return on
plan assets, rate of compensation increases, interest crediting
ratesandmortalityrates.Thecompanyevaluatestheseassump-
tions,ataminimum,annually,andmakeschangesasnecessary.
Followingisinformationonassumptionswhichhadasignif-
icant impact on net periodic cost/(income) and the year-end
benefitobligations for definedbenefit pension plans and non-
pensionpostretirementbenefitplanswereasfollows:
NONPENSIONPOSTRETIREMENT
SIGNIFICANTDEFINEDBENEFITPENSIONPLANS* BENEFITPLANS
U.S. PLANS NON-U.S. PLANS U.S. PLANS
2005 2004 2003 2005 2004** 2003** 2005 2004 2003
Weighted-average assumptions used
to determine netperiodic cost/(income)
fortheyearended December31:
Discountrate ««««5.75% «6.00% «6.75% «4.70% «5.20% «5.50% «5.75% «6.00% 6.75%
Expectedlong-termreturnonplanassets «8.00% «8.00% «8.00% «7.20% «7.50% «7.60% N/A N/A N/A
Rateofcompensationincrease «4.00% «4.00% «4.00% «3.00% 2.90% 3.20% N/A N/A N/A
Weighted-average assumptions
usedto determine benefit
obligationat December31:
Discountrate «5.50% «5.75% «6.00% «4.20% «4.70% «5.20% «««5.50% «5.75% «6.00%
Rateofcompensationincrease «4.00% «4.00% «4.00% «3.00% 3.10% 3.00% N/A N/A N/A
* SignificantdefinedbenefitplansconsistofthequalifiedportionoftheIBMPPPintheU.S.andthematerialnon-U.S.Plans.
** Prioryearamountshavebeenreclassifiedtoconformwithcurrentyearpresentation.
N/A—Notapplicable
DISCOUNTRATE
Thediscount rate assumptions used forpension and nonpen-
sion postretirement benefit plan accounting reflect the yields
available on high-quality, fixed income debt instruments. For
U.S. discount rates, a portfolio of corporate bonds is con-
structed with maturities that match the expected timing of the
benefitobligationpayments.Inthenon-U.S.,wheremarketsfor
high-quality long-term bonds are not generally as well devel-
oped, long-term government bonds are used as a base, to
which a credit spread is added to simulate corporate bond
yieldsatthesematurities inthejurisdictionofeachplan,asthe
benchmarkfordevelopingtherespectivediscountrates.
ForthePPP,thechangesinthediscountrateimpactedboth
netperiodiccostandbenefitobligation.Forpurposesofcalcu-
lating the 2005 net periodic cost, the discount rate changed
from6.0percentto5.75percentwhichresultedinanincreasein
net periodic cost of approximately $90 million. Similarly, the
2004changeindiscountratefrom6.75 percentto6.0 percent
increasednetperiodiccostbyapproximately$197million.