IBM 2005 Annual Report Download - page 92

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 92 of the 2005 IBM annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 105

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105

NotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements
INTERNATIONALBUSINESSMACHINESCORPORATION ANDSUBSIDIARYCOMPANIES
_91
InDecember2005,thecompanyapproved amendments
to the PPP and the SERP which provided that active partici-
pantswillnolongeraccruebenefitsunderthese plans effec-
tive December31,2007.Asaresultofthisaction,thecompany
recordedacurtailmentchargeofapproximately$267millionin
the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2005. In addition, the company recorded a
reductionin thePBObalances ofapproximately$775million
and $13 million at December 31, 2005 for the PPP and the
SERP,respectively.
Inaddition,inDecember2005,thecompanyamendedthe
IBMJapanPensionPlan,whichthecompanyconsidersoneof
itsmaterialnon-U.S.pension plans.Thisamendmentmodified
certainplantermsincludingachangeinthemethodofcalculat-
ingbenefitsforcertainparticipantsatDecember31,2005.This
amendmentdidnot impact netperiodiccost/(income),however,
theamendmentresultedina$561 millionreductiontothePBO
asofDecember31,2005.
The overall change in the Net prepaid pension asset bal-
ance from 2004 to 2005 of approximately $500 million was
causedbyanincreasein the prepaidpensionassetrelatedto
thePPPasofDecember31,2005, principallydueto a $1.7bil-
lioncontributionmadebythecompanyinJanuary2005which
increasedthefairvalueofplanassets.Inaddition,aportionof
theoverallincreaseintheprepaidpensionassetinthePPPwas
drivenbythereductionofthePBOasaresultofthe planamend-
mentthatcaused the curtailmentcharge previously discussed.
The reduction in the material non-U.S. plan prepaid pension
assetwasdrivenprincipallybythereductioninthePBOrelated
totheamendmentsmadetotheIBMJapanPensionPlan. The
increaseinthecompany’sPrepaidpensionassetbalancefrom
2003 to 2004 was primarily due to a $700 million contribution
madebythecompanytothePPPduring2004.
ASSUMPTIONS USED TO DETERMINE PLAN
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Underlying both the calculation of the PBO and net periodic
cost/(income)areactuarialvaluations.Thesevaluationsusepar-
ticipant-specific information such as salary, age and years of
service,as well as certain assumptions, themostsignificant of
which include: estimates of discount rates, expected return on
plan assets, rate of compensation increases, interest crediting
ratesandmortalityrates.Thecompanyevaluatestheseassump-
tions,ataminimum,annually,andmakeschangesasnecessary.
Followingisinformationonassumptionswhichhadasignif-
icant impact on net periodic cost/(income) and the year-end
benefitobligations for definedbenefit pension plans and non-
pensionpostretirementbenefitplanswereasfollows:
NONPENSIONPOSTRETIREMENT
SIGNIFICANTDEFINEDBENEFITPENSIONPLANS* BENEFITPLANS
U.S. PLANS NON-U.S. PLANS U.S. PLANS
2005 2004 2003 2005 2004** 2003** 2005 2004 2003
Weighted-average assumptions used
to determine netperiodic cost/(income)
fortheyearended December31:
Discountrate ««««5.75% «6.00% «6.75% «4.70% «5.20% «5.50% «5.75% «6.00% 6.75%
Expectedlong-termreturnonplanassets «8.00% «8.00% «8.00% «7.20% «7.50% «7.60% N/A N/A N/A
Rateofcompensationincrease «4.00% «4.00% «4.00% «3.00% 2.90% 3.20% N/A N/A N/A
Weighted-average assumptions
usedto determine benefit
obligationat December31:
Discountrate «5.50% «5.75% «6.00% «4.20% «4.70% «5.20% «««5.50% «5.75% «6.00%
Rateofcompensationincrease «4.00% «4.00% «4.00% «3.00% 3.10% 3.00% N/A N/A N/A
* SignificantdefinedbenefitplansconsistofthequalifiedportionoftheIBMPPPintheU.S.andthematerialnon-U.S.Plans.
** Prioryearamountshavebeenreclassifiedtoconformwithcurrentyearpresentation.
N/A—Notapplicable
DISCOUNTRATE
Thediscount rate assumptions used forpension and nonpen-
sion postretirement benefit plan accounting reflect the yields
available on high-quality, fixed income debt instruments. For
U.S. discount rates, a portfolio of corporate bonds is con-
structed with maturities that match the expected timing of the
benefitobligationpayments.Inthenon-U.S.,wheremarketsfor
high-quality long-term bonds are not generally as well devel-
oped, long-term government bonds are used as a base, to
which a credit spread is added to simulate corporate bond
yieldsatthesematurities inthejurisdictionofeachplan,asthe
benchmarkfordevelopingtherespectivediscountrates.
ForthePPP,thechangesinthediscountrateimpactedboth
netperiodiccostandbenefitobligation.Forpurposesofcalcu-
lating the 2005 net periodic cost, the discount rate changed
from6.0percentto5.75percentwhichresultedinanincreasein
net periodic cost of approximately $90 million. Similarly, the
2004changeindiscountratefrom6.75 percentto6.0 percent
increasednetperiodiccostbyapproximately$197million.