IBM 2005 Annual Report Download - page 43

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 43 of the 2005 IBM annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 105

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105

ManagementDiscussion
INTERNATIONALBUSINESSMACHINESCORPORATION ANDSUBSIDIARYCOMPANIES
42_ ManagementDiscussion
amount of the restructuring charges could be materially
impacted.Seenote R,“2005Actions” onpages 80 and 81 fora
descriptionofrestructuringactions.
CurrencyRateFluctuations
Changesintherelativevaluesofnon-U.S.currenciestotheU.S.
dollaraffectthecompany’sresults.AtDecember31,2005,cur-
rencychangesresultedinassetsandliabilitiesdenominatedin
localcurrenciesbeingtranslatedinto fewer dollarsthanatyear-
end 2004. The company uses a variety of financial hedging
instruments to limit specific currency risks related to financing
transactions and other foreign currency-based transactions.
Furtherdiscussionofcurrencyandhedgingappearsin note L,
“DerivativesandHedgingTransactions,” onpages 71 to 74.
The company earned approximately 45 percent of its net
incomeincurrenciesotherthantheU.S.dollar. Thecompanyalso
maintains hedging programs to limit the volatility of currency
impactsonthecompany’s financial results.Thesehedgingpro-
grams limit the impact of currency changes on the company’s
financialresultsbutdonoteliminatethem.Inadditiontothetrans-
lation of earnings and the company’s hedging programs, the
impactofcurrencychangesalsomayaffectthecompany’spric-
ingandsourcingactions.Forexample,thecompanymayprocure
components and supplies in multiple functional currencies and
sell products and services in other currencies. Therefore, it is
impracticaltoquantifytheimpact of currencyonthesetransac-
tions and on consolidated net income. Generally, the company
believesthatextendedperiodsofdollarweaknessarepositivefor
netincomeandextendedperiodsofdollarstrengtharenegative,
althoughthepreciseimpactisdifficulttoassess.
Fornon-U.S.subsidiariesandbranchesthatoperateinU.S.
dollars or whose economic environment is highly inflationary,
translation adjustments are reflected in results of operations,
as required by SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.
Generally,thecompanymanagescurrencyriskintheseentities
bylinkingpricesandcontractstoU.S.dollarsandbyentering
intoforeigncurrencyhedgecontracts.
MarketRisk
In the normal course of business, the financial position of the
companyisroutinelysubjecttoavarietyofrisks.Inadditionto
themarketriskassociatedwithinterestrateandcurrencymove-
ments on outstanding debt and non-U.S. dollar denominated
assetsandliabilities,otherexamplesofriskincludecollectibility
ofaccountsreceivableandrecoverabilityofresidualvalueson
leasedassets.
Thecompanyregularlyassessestheserisksandhasestab-
lished policies and business practices to protect against the
adverse effects of these and other potential exposures. As a
result,thecompanydoesnotanticipateanymateriallossesfrom
theserisks.
The company’s debt in support of the Global Financing
businessandthegeographicbreadthofthecompany’sopera-
tionscontain anelementofmarketriskfromchangesininterest
and currency rates. The company manages this risk, in part,
through the use of a variety of financial instruments including
derivatives, as explained in note L, “Derivatives and Hedging
Transactions, onpages 71 to74.
Tomeetdisclosurerequirements,thecompanyperformsa
sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market risk
exposuresmayhaveon the fairvaluesof the company’s debt
andotherfinancialinstruments.
Thefinancialinstrumentsthatareincludedinthesensitivity
analysiscompriseallofthecompany’scashandcashequiva-
lents, marketable securities, long-term non-lease receivables,
investments, long-term and short-term debt and all derivative
financial instruments. The company’s portfolio of derivative
financialinstrumentsgenerallyincludesinterestrateswaps,for-
eigncurrencyswaps,forwardcontractsandoptioncontracts.
Toperformthesensitivity analysis, thecompanyassesses
the risk of loss in fair values from the effect of hypothetical
changesininterestratesandforeigncurrencyexchangerates
onmarket-sensitiveinstruments.Themarketvaluesforinterest
andforeigncurrencyexchangeriskarecomputedbasedonthe
presentvalueoffuturecashflowsasaffectedbythechangesin
rates that are attributable to the market risk being measured.
The discount rates used for the present value computations
were selected based on market interest and foreign currency
exchangerates ineffectatDecember31,2005 and2004.The
differences in this comparison are the hypothetical gains or
lossesassociatedwitheachtypeofrisk.
Information provided by the sensitivity analysis does not
necessarilyrepresenttheactual changes in fair value thatthe
companywouldincurundernormalmarketconditionsbecause,
duetopracticallimitations,allvariablesotherthanthespecific
marketriskfactorareheldconstant.Inaddition,theresultsofthe
modelareconstrainedbythefactthatcertainitemsarespecifi-
callyexcludedfromtheanalysis,whilethefinancialinstruments
relatingtothefinancingorhedgingofthoseitemsareincluded
bydefinition.Excludeditemsincludeleasedassets,forecasted
foreigncurrencycashflowsandthecompany’snetinvestment
inforeignoperations.As aconsequence,reported changes in
the values of some of the financial instruments impacting the
resultsofthesensitivityanalysisarenotmatchedwiththeoffset-
ting changes in the values of the items that those instruments
aredesignedtofinanceorhedge.
TheresultsofthesensitivityanalysisatDecember31,2005,
andDecember31,2004,areasfollows:
INTEREST RATE RISK
At December 31, 2005, a10 percent decrease in the levels of
interestrateswithallothervariablesheldconstantwouldresult
in an increase inthefairmarketvalueofthecompany’sfinancial
instrumentsof$18 millionascomparedwithadecreaseof$172
millionatDecember31,2004.A10percentincreaseinthelev-
elsofinterestrateswithallothervariablesheldconstantwould
resultin a decreaseinthefairvalueofthecompany’sfinancial
instrumentsof$8 millionascomparedto anincreaseof $153 mil-
lionatDecember31,2004.Changesintherelativesensitivityof
thefairvalueofthecompany’sfinancialinstrumentportfoliofor
thesetheoreticalchangesinthelevelofinterestratesareprima-
rilydrivenby changes inthecompany’s debtmaturity,interest
rateprofileandamount.