Travelers 2002 Annual Report Download - page 66

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 66 of the 2002 Travelers annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 100

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100

Because many of the coverages we offer involve claims that may
not ultimately be settled for many years after they are incurred, sub-
jective judgments as to our ultimate exposure to losses are an integral
and necessary component of our loss reserving process. We record
our reserves by considering a range of estimates bounded by a high
and low point. Within that range, we record management’s best esti-
mate.We continually review our reserves, using a variety of statistical
and actuarial techniques to analyze current claim costs, frequency
and severity data, and prevailing economic, social and legal factors.
We adjust reserves established in prior years as loss experience
develops and new information becomes available.Adjustments to pre-
viously estimated reserves are reflected in our financial results in the
periods in which the changes in estimate are made.
Reserves for environmental and asbestos exposures cannot be
estimated solely with the traditional loss reserving techniques
described above, which rely on historical accident year development
factors and take into consideration the previously mentioned vari-
ables. Environmental and asbestos reserves are more difficult to esti-
mate than our other loss reserves because of legal issues, societal
factors and difficulty in determining the parties who may ultimately be
held liable.Therefore, in addition to taking into consideration the tradi-
tional variables that are utilized to arrive at our other loss reserve
amounts, we also look at the length of time necessary to clean up pol-
luted sites, controversies surrounding the identity of the responsible
party, the degree of remediation deemed to be necessary, the esti-
mated time period for litigation expenses, judicial expansions of cov-
erage, medical complications arising with asbestos claimants’
advanced age, case law, and the history of prior claim development.
We also consider the impact of changes in the legal environment,
including our experience in the Western MacArthur matter, in estab-
lishing our reserves for other asbestos and environmental cases.
Generally, case reserves and loss adjustment expense reserves are
established where sufficient information has been obtained to indicate
coverage under a specific insurance policy. We also consider end of
period reserves in relation to paid losses in a period. Furthermore,
IBNR reserves are established to cover additional estimated expo-
sures on both known and unasserted claims.These reserves are con-
tinually reviewed and updated as additional information is acquired.
While our reported reserves make a reasonable provision for our
unpaid loss and LAE obligations, it should be noted that the process
of estimating required reserves, by its very nature, involves substan-
tial uncertainty. The level of uncertainty can be influenced by factors
such as the existence of coverage with long duration payment pat-
terns and changes in claim handling practices, as well as the factors
noted above. Ultimate actual payments for claims and LAE could turn
out to be significantly different from our estimates.
Our liabilities for unpaid losses and LAE related to tabular workers’
compensation and certain assumed reinsurance coverage are dis-
counted to the present value of estimated future payments. Prior to
discounting, these liabilities totaled $887 million and $948 million at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The total discounted lia-
bility reflected on our balance sheet was $718 million and $768 mil-
lion at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The liability for
workers’ compensation was discounted using rates of up to 3.5%,
based on state-prescribed rates.The liability for certain assumed rein-
surance coverage was discounted using rates up to 7.5%, based on
our return on invested assets or, in many cases, on yields contractu-
ally guaranteed to us on funds held by the ceding company, as per-
mitted by the state of domicile.
Lloyd’s We participate in Lloyd’s as an investor in underwriting
syndicates and as the owner of a managing agency. Using the periodic
method, which provides for current recognition of profits and losses,
we record our pro rata share of syndicate assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, after making adjustments to convert Lloyd’s accounting
to U.S. GAAP. The most significant U.S. GAAP adjustments relate to
income recognition. Lloyd’s syndicates determine underwriting results
by year of account at the end of three years.We record adjustments to
recognize underwriting results as incurred, including the expected ulti-
mate cost of losses incurred. These adjustments to losses are based
on actuarial analysis of syndicate accounts, including forecasts of
64
expected ultimate losses provided by the syndicates.The results of our
operations at Lloyd’s are recorded on a one-quarter lag due to time
constraints in obtaining and analyzing such results for inclusion in our
consolidated financial statements on a current basis. (Also see discus-
sion under “Premiums Earned” above.)
Policy Acquisition Expenses — The costs directly related to writing
an insurance policy are referred to as policy acquisition expenses and
consist of commissions, state premium taxes and other direct under-
writing expenses. Although these expenses are incurred when we
issue a policy, we defer and amortize them over the same period as
the corresponding premiums are recorded as revenues. On a regular
basis, we perform a recoverability analysis of the deferred policy
acquisition costs in relation to the expected recognition of revenues,
including anticipated investment income, and reflect adjustments, if
any, as period costs. Should the analysis indicate that the acquisition
costs are unrecoverable, further analyses are performed to determine
if a reserve is required to provide for losses, which may exceed the
related unearned premiums.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — Our allowance for doubtful
accounts for premiums and deductibles receivable is calculated by
applying an estimated bad debt percentage to an aging of receivables
segmented by business unit to determine general collectibility.
Specific collection issues are highlighted separately, and a compari-
son of prior year write-offs with year-to-date results is made to deter-
mine reasonableness. We also have an allowance for uncollectible
reinsurance recoverables that is calculated based on the outstanding
balances, taking into consideration the status of the reinsurer, the
nature of the balance and whether or not the amount is in dispute.The
establishment of our allowance for doubtful accounts involves judg-
ment and therefore creates a degree of uncertainty as to adequacy at
each reporting date.
Guarantee Fund and Other Insurance-Related Assessments
We establish an accrual related to estimated future guarantee fund
payments and other insurance-related assessments, primarily second
injury funds. Guarantee fund payments are based on our historical
experience as well as for specific known events or insolvencies. Loss-
based second injury fund assessments are accrued based on our
total loss reserves for the relevant states and lines of business. As of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, we carried an accrual of $43 million
and $49 million, respectively, for these payments, which are expected
to be disbursed as assessed during a period of up to 30 years. We
also establish assets related to the recovery of these costs when
appropriate. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, we carried assets of
$15 million and $9 million for premium tax offsets, respectively, and
$11 million and $2 million for policy surcharges, respectively. This
accrual is subject to change following revisions to assessments that
may be enacted by any of the states we write business in.
ACCOUNTING FOR OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS
We hold a 79% interest in Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen
Investments,” formerly The John Nuveen Company), which consti-
tutes our asset management segment. Nuveen Investments’ core
businesses are asset management and related research, as well as
the development, marketing and distribution of investment products
and services for the affluent, high-net-worth and institutional market
segments. Nuveen Investments distributes its investment products
and services, including individually managed accounts, closed-end
exchange-traded funds and mutual funds, to the affluent and high-net-
worth market segments through unaffiliated intermediary firms includ-
ing broker/dealers, commercial banks, affiliates of insurance
providers, financial planners, accountants, consultants and invest-
ment advisors. Nuveen Investments also provides managed account
services to several institutional market segments and channels.
In August 2002, Nuveen Investments purchased NWQ Investment
Management Company, Inc. (“NWQ”), an asset management firm
based in Los Angeles with approximately $6.9 billion of assets under
management in both retail and institutional managed accounts. NWQ
specializes in value-oriented equity investments with significant rela-
tionships among institutions and financial advisors serving high-
net-worth investors.