IHOP 2009 Annual Report Download - page 66

$0.15 billion to $2.25 billion for 2009 from $2.40 billion during 2008. Additionally, the weighted average
interest rate on variable rate debt was approximately 2.5% for 2009 compared to 4.7% for 2008.
Impairment and Closure Charges
Impairment and closure charges for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2009 2008
(In millions)
Goodwill impairment ................................ $ — $124.8
Tradename impairment ............................... 93.5 44.1
Long-lived tangible asset impairment ..................... 10.4 71.4
Closure charges .................................... 1.2 0.3
Total impairment and closure charges ...................... $105.1 $240.6
Goodwill
In accordance with U.S GAAP, goodwill must be evaluated for impairment, at a minimum, on an
annual basis, and more frequently if the Company believes indicators of impairment exist. Such
indicators include, but are not limited to, events or circumstances such as a significant adverse change
in the business climate, unanticipated competition, a loss of key personnel, adverse legal or regulatory
developments, or a significant decline in the market price of the Company’s common stock. In the
process of the annual impairment review, we primarily use the income approach method of valuation
that uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of reporting units. Significant
assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model include future trends in sales, operating expenses,
overhead expenses, depreciation, capital expenditures, and changes in working capital, along with an
appropriate discount rate. During the course of fiscal 2009, we made periodic assessments as to
whether there were indicators of impairment, particularly with respect to the significant assumptions
underlying the discounted cash flow model, and determined an interim test of goodwill was not
warranted. Accordingly, we performed the annual test of goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of
2009. In performing the test, the Company revised downwards the same-store sales change assumption
in its five-year forecast that had been used in the prior year. The Company also revised downward the
assumed discount rate. In performing the first step of the impairment test, the estimated fair value of
both the IHOP and Applebee’s franchised restaurant units exceeded their respective carrying values
and it was concluded there was no impairment of goodwill. The goodwill that had been allocated to the
Applebee’s company-operated restaurants unit was fully impaired in 2008.
A significant majority of our goodwill arose from the November 29, 2007 acquisition of
Applebee’s; $10.8 million of goodwill resulted from a prior transaction related to the IHOP franchised
restaurants unit. We allocated the goodwill from the acquisition to two reporting units, the Applebee’s
company-operated restaurants unit (the ‘‘Company unit’’) and the Applebee’s franchised restaurants
unit (‘‘Applebee’s franchise unit’’). Consistent with our intent to franchise the significant majority of the
company-operated Applebee’s restaurants acquired, we determined the fair value of the Company unit
for purposes of assigning goodwill to be the estimated sales value of the restaurants, the value that a
market participant would have paid to purchase the restaurants on the day following the acquisition.
The fair value of the Company unit was based on a multiple of approximately six times the operating
cash flow for the trailing twelve months of the Company unit. This multiple was supported by actual
refranchising transactions negotiated within a month after the acquisition. The fair value of the
franchise unit was determined using a discounted cash flow based on forecast royalty revenues from the
franchise operations. These fair values, which reconciled to the overall purchase price paid to acquire
47