Priceline 2010 Annual Report Download - page 82

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 82 of the 2010 Priceline annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 200

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200

8
discount hotel market in the U.S. could decrease. Online travel companies have also offered consumers value
features such as, without limitation, the elimination and/or reduction of processing fees, the adoption of “best price”
guarantees and the waiver of cancellation and change fees. The elimination of processing fees on retail airline
tickets by us and our major competitors, coupled with the recent significant year over year increases in retail air
fares, has led consumers to engage in increased shopping behavior before making a purchase. Increased shopping
behavior reduces our advertising efficiency and effectiveness as traffic obtained through online advertising becomes
less likely to result in a purchase on our web site.
Large, established Internet search engines with substantial resources and expertise in developing online
commerce and facilitating Internet traffic are creating – and intend to further create – inroads into online travel, both
in the U.S. and internationally. For example, Google recently announced that it has entered into an agreement to
acquire ITA Software, Inc., a major flight information software company, which could allow Google to pursue the
creation of new flight search tools which will enable users to find flight information on the Internet without using a
service like ours. Google has also invested in HomeAway, a vacation home rental service. In addition, Google has
launched a travel “meta-search” site to show searchers specific hotels and rates in addition to text advertisements,
and Microsoft has launched Bing Travel, a “meta-search” site, which searches for airfare and hotel reservations
online and predicts the best time to purchase them. “Meta-search” sites leverage their search technology to
aggregate travel search results for the searcher’s specific itinerary across supplier, travel agent and other websites
and, in many instances, compete directly with us for customers. These initiatives, among others, illustrate Google’s
and Bing’s clear intention to more directly appeal to travel consumers by showing consumers more detailed travel
search results, including specific information for travelers’ own itineraries, which could lead to suppliers or others
gaining a larger share of Google’s or Bing’s traffic or may ultimately lead to search engines maintaining transactions
within their own websites. If Google, as the single largest search engine in the world, or Bing, or other leading
search engines refer significant traffic to these or other travel services that they develop in the future, it could result
in, among other things, more competition from supplier websites and higher customer acquisition costs for third-
party sites such as ours and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Many airline, hotel and rental car suppliers, including suppliers with which we conduct business, are
focusing on driving online demand to their own websites in lieu of third-party distributors such as us. Certain
suppliers have attempted to charge additional fees to customers who book airline reservations through an online
channel other than their own website. Furthermore, some airlines may distribute their tickets exclusively through
their own websites. Suppliers who sell on their own websites typically do not charge a processing fee, and, in some
instances, offer advantages such as web-only fares, bonus miles or loyalty points, which could make their offerings
more attractive to consumers than models like ours.
Many of our current and potential competitors, including Internet directories, search engines and large
traditional retailers, have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and
significantly greater financial, marketing, personnel, technical and other resources than we do. Some of these
competitors may be able to secure services on more favorable terms than we can. In addition, many of these
competitors may be able to devote significantly greater resources to:
x marketing and promotional campaigns;
x attracting traffic to their websites;
x attracting and retaining key employees;
x securing vendors and supply; and
x website and systems development.
Increased competition could result in reduced operating margins, loss of market share and damage to our
brand. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors
or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. See “Risk Factors – Intense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial
performance.”