OfficeMax 2005 Annual Report Download - page 74

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 74 of the 2005 OfficeMax annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 132

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132

after January 1, 2003, as permitted in SFAS No. 148, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—
Transition and Disclosure.’’ Prior to 2003, the Company accounted for its stock-based employee
compensation plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,
‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,’’ and its related interpretations. Under APB Opinion
No. 25, the cost for stock-based awards was measured as the excess of the market value of the
underlying common stock at the time of grant over the amount that the employee was required to
pay upon exercise. Because the Company’s stock option awards were generally granted with
exercise prices that were equal to the market value of the underlying stock as of the date of grant,
no significant compensation expense related to stock options was recognized under the provisions
of APB No. 25. The adoption of SFAS No. 123 did not materially affect the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
Vendor Rebates and Allowances
The Company participates in various cooperative advertising and other marketing programs
with its vendors. The Company also participates in volume purchase rebate programs, some of
which provide for tiered rebates based on defined levels of purchase volume. These arrangements
enable the Company to receive reimbursement for costs incurred to promote the sale of vendor
products, or to earn rebates that reduce the cost of merchandise purchased. Effective January 1,
2003, the Company adopted the guidelines issued by the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (the
‘‘EITF’’) in Issue No. 02-16, ‘‘Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain
Consideration Received From a Vendor.’’ Under EITF Issue No. 02-16, consideration received from
a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the cost of the vendor’s products or services, unless it is
for a specific, incremental and identifiable cost to sell the product. Accordingly, volume-based
rebates and allowances are accrued as earned over the incentive period and are initially recorded
as a reduction in the cost of merchandise inventories, and are included in operations (as a
reduction in materials, labor and other operating expenses) in the period the related product is
sold. Amounts received under other event-based promotional programs are recognized at the time
of the event as a reduction of cost of goods sold or inventory, as appropriate, based on the nature
of the promotion and the terms of the vendor agreement. The adoption of EITF 02-16 resulted in a
non-cash, after-tax charge of $4.7 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, in 2003.
70