IBM 2006 Annual Report Download - page 48

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 48 of the 2006 IBM annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

Changes in the discount rate assumptions will impact the service
cost, (gain)/loss amortization and interest cost components of the net
periodic pension cost/(income) calculation (see page 107 for informa-
tion regarding the discount rate assumptions) and the projected benefit
obligation (PBO). As presented on page 106, the company increased
the discount rate assumption for the U.S. PPP by 25 basis points to
5.75 percent on December 31, 2006. This change will decrease pre-tax
cost and expense recognized in 2007 by $90 million. If the discount
rate assumption for the PPP decreased by 25 basis points on
December 31, 2006, pre-tax cost and expense recognized in 2007
would have increased by $87 million. Changes in the discount rate
assumptions will impact the PBO which, in turn, may impact the
company’s funding decisions if the PBO exceeds plan assets. Each 25
basis point increase or decrease in the discount rate will cause a cor-
responding decrease or increase, respectively, in the PPP’s PBO of an
estimated $1.2 billion based upon December 31, 2006 data. Page 104
presents the PPP’s PBO (after the increase in discount rate presented
on page 106) and plan assets as of December 31, 2006.
The expected long-term return on plan assets is used in calculating
the net periodic pension (income)/cost. See page 107 for information
regarding the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption.
The differences between the actual return on plan assets and expected
long-term return on plan assets are recognized over five years in the
expected return on plan assets line in net periodic pension (income)/
cost and also as a component of actuarial gains/losses, which are rec-
ognized over the service lives of the employees in the plan, provided
such amounts exceed thresholds which are based upon the obligation
or the value of plan assets, as provided by accounting standards.
To the extent the outlook for long-term returns changes such that
management changes its expected long-term return on plan assets
assumption, each 50 basis point increase or decrease in the expected
long-term return on PPP plan assets assumption will have an estimated
increase or decrease, respectively, of $232 million on the following
year’s pre-tax net periodic pension (income)/cost (based upon the
PPP’s plan assets at December 31, 2006 and assuming no contribu-
tions are made in 2007).
The company may voluntarily make contributions or be required,
by law, to make contributions to its pension plans. Actual results that
differ from the estimates may result in more or less future company
funding into the pension plans than is planned by management.
Impacts of these types of changes on the company’s pension plans
in other countries worldwide will vary depending upon the status of
each respective plan.
Costs to Complete Service Contracts
The company enters into numerous service contracts through its
GTS and GBS businesses. During the contractual period, revenue,
cost and profits may be impacted by estimates of the ultimate profit-
ability of each contract, especially contracts for which the company
uses the percentage-of-completion (POC) method of accounting. If
at any time these estimates indicate the contract will be unprofitable
for POC contracts, the entire estimated loss for the remainder of the
contract is recorded immediately in cost. The company performs ongo-
ing profitability analyses of its services contracts in order to determine
whether the latest estimates require updating. Key factors reviewed by
the company to estimate the future costs to complete each contract
are future labor costs, future product costs and productivity efficiencies.
Contract loss provisions recorded as a component of Other accrued
expenses and liabilities are approximately $32 million and $70 million
at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Income Taxes
The company is subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous
foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments are required in determin-
ing the consolidated provision for income taxes.
During the ordinary course of business, there are many transac-
tions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is
uncertain. As a result, the company recognizes tax liabilities based on
estimates of whether additional taxes and interest will be due. These
tax liabilities are recognized when, despite the company’s belief that
its tax return positions are supportable, the company believes that
certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be fully sus-
tained upon review by tax authorities. The company believes that its
accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open audit years based on
its assessment of many factors including past experience and interpre-
tations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions
and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events.
To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different
than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact income tax
expense in the period in which such determination is made.
Significant judgment is also required in determining any valuation
allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need
for a valuation allowance, management considers all available evi-
dence including past operating results, estimates of future taxable
income and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. In the
event that the company changes its determination as to the amount of
deferred tax assets that can be realized, the company will adjust its
valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to income tax
expense in the period in which such determination is made.
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHIN ES CORPORATION AND SUBSI DIARY COMPANIES
46 2006 Annual Report
Management Discussion ........................................................
Road Map ............................................................................. 
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements ..................... 
Management Discussion Snapshot ...................................... 
Description of Business ....................................................... 
Year in Review...................................................................... 
Prior Year in Review ............................................................. 
Discontinued Operations ..................................................... 
Other Information ................................................................ 
Global Financing .................................................................. 
Report of Management .........................................................
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ....
Consolidated Statements .......................................................
Black
MAC
2718 CG10