Rogers 2009 Annual Report Download - page 44

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 44 of the 2009 Rogers annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 130

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130

48 ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2009 ANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
securities inasmuch as such ratings do not comment as to market
price or suitability for a particular investor. There is no assurance
that any rating will remain in effect for any given period of time,
or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by a
rating agency in the future if in its judgment circumstances so
warrant. The ratings on RCI’s senior debt of BBB from Standard &
Poors and Fitch and of Baa2 from Moody’s represent investment
grade ratings.
Deficiency of Pension Plan Assets Over Accrued Obligations
In 2009, we made a lump-sum contribution of $61 million to our
pension plans, following which the pension plans purchased $172
million of annuities from insurance companies for employees
in the pension plans who had retired as of January 1, 2009. The
purchase of the annuities relieves us of primary responsibility for,
and eliminates significant risk associated with, the accrued benefit
obligation for the retired employees. The non-cash settlement loss
arising from this settlement of pension obligations was $30 million
and was recorded in 2009.
As disclosed in Note 17 to our 2009 Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements, our pension plans had a deficiency of plan assets over
accrued obligations of $8 million and $66 million at December 31,
2009, and December 31, 2008, respectively, related to funded plans,
and a deficiency of $31 million and $27 million at December 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively, related to unfunded plans.
Our pension plans had a deficiency on a solvency basis at December
31, 2008, and is anticipated to have a deficiency on a solvency basis
at December 31, 2009. Consequently, in addition to our regular
contributions, we are making certain minimum monthly special
payments to eliminate the solvency deficiency. In 2009, the special
payment totalled approximately $34 million. Our total estimated
annual funding requirements, which include both our regular
contributions and these special payments, are expected to decrease
from $120 million in 2009 (which included the $61 million lump
sum contribution discussed above) to $56 million in 2010, subject
to annual adjustments thereafter, due to various market factors
and the assumption that our stafng levels will remain relatively
stable year-over-year. We are contributing to the plans on this basis.
As further discussed in the section of this MD&A entitled “Critical
Accounting Estimates”, changes in factors such as the discount rate,
the rate of compensation increase and the expected return on
plan assets can impact the accrued benet obligation, pension
expense and the deficiency of plan assets over accrued obligations
in the future.
INTEREST RATE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT
Economic Hedge Analysis
For the purposes of our discussion on the hedged portion of long-
term debt, we have used non-GAAP measures in that we include all
Derivatives, whether or not they qualify as hedges for accounting
purposes, since all such Derivatives are used for risk management
purposes only and are designated as a hedge of specific debt
instruments for economic purposes. As a result, the Canadian dollar
equivalent of U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt reflects
the contracted foreign exchange rate for all of our Derivatives
regardless of qualifications for accounting purposes as a hedge.
On December 15, 2009, we redeemed the entire outstanding
principal amount of our US$400 million 8.00% Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2012, which were not hedged on an economic basis nor
on an accounting basis. As a result of the redemption of these
unhedged Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012, on December 31,
2009, 100% of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt was hedged on an
economic basis while 94% of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt was
hedged on an accounting basis. The Derivatives hedging our US$350
million 7.50% Senior Notes due 2038 do not qualify as hedges for
accounting purposes.
Consolidated Hedged Position
Years ended December 31,
(In millions of dollars, except percentages) December 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt US $ 5,540 US $ 5,940
Hedged with Derivatives US $ 5,540 US $ 5,540
Hedged exchange rate 1.2043 1.2043
Percent hedged 100.0%(1) 93.3%
Amount of long-term debt(2) atxed rates:
Total long-term debt Cdn $ 9,307 Cdn $ 8,383
Total long-term debt at xed rates Cdn $ 9,307 Cdn $ 7,798
Percent of long-term debt fixed 100.0% 93.0%
Weighted average interest rate on long-term debt 7.27% 7. 29%
(1) Pursuant to the requirements for hedge accounting under Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook Section 3865, Hedges, on December 31, 2009, RCI accounted for 93.5% of its
Derivatives as hedges against designated U.S. dollar denominated debt. As a result, 93.7% of our U.S. dollar-denominated debt is hedged for accounting purposes versus 100% on an economic basis.
(2) Long-term debt includes the effect of the Derivatives.