Xcel Energy 2013 Annual Report Download - page 85

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 85 of the 2013 Xcel Energy annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 180

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180

67
In conjunction with the NSP-Minnesota debt issuance in August 2012, NSP-Minnesota settled interest rate hedging instruments with a
notional amount of $225 million with cash payments of $45.0 million. In conjunction with the PSCo debt issuance in September
2012, PSCo settled interest rate hedging instruments with a notional amount of $250 million with cash payments of $44.7 million.
These losses are classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet, net of tax, and
are being reclassified to earnings over the term of the hedged interest payments. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements
for further discussion of long-term borrowings.
At Dec. 31, 2013 and 2012, a 100 basis point change in the benchmark rate on Xcel Energy’s variable rate debt would impact pretax
interest expense annually by approximately $8.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements for a discussion of Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries’ interest rate derivatives.
NSP-Minnesota also maintains a nuclear decommissioning fund, as required by the NRC. The nuclear decommissioning fund is
subject to interest rate risk and equity price risk. At Dec. 31, 2013, the fund was invested in a diversified portfolio of cash equivalents,
debt securities, equity securities, and other investments. These investments may be used only for activities related to nuclear
decommissioning. Given the purpose and legal restrictions on the use of nuclear decommissioning fund assets, realized and unrealized
gains on fund investments over the life of the fund are deferred as an offset of NSP-Minnesota’s regulatory asset for nuclear
decommissioning costs. Consequently, any realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities in the nuclear decommissioning
fund, including any other-than-temporary impairments, are deferred as a component of the regulatory asset for nuclear
decommissioning. Since the accounting for nuclear decommissioning recognizes that costs are recovered through rates, fluctuations in
equity prices or interest rates do not have an impact on earnings.
Credit Risk — Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries are also exposed to credit risk. Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from
counterparties’ nonperformance on their contractual obligations. Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries maintain credit policies
intended to minimize overall credit risk and actively monitor these policies to reflect changes and scope of operations.
At Dec. 31, 2013, a 10 percent increase in commodity prices would have resulted in an increase in credit exposure of $15.2 million,
while a decrease in prices of 10 percent would have resulted in an increase in credit exposure of $2.6 million. At Dec. 31, 2012, a 10
percent increase in commodity prices would have resulted in a decrease in credit exposure of $11.6 million, while a decrease in prices
of 10 percent would have resulted in an increase in credit exposure of $12.6 million.
Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries conduct standard credit reviews for all counterparties. Xcel Energy employs additional credit
risk control mechanisms when appropriate, such as letters of credit, parental guarantees, standardized master netting agreements and
termination provisions that allow for offsetting of positive and negative exposures. Credit exposure is monitored and, when necessary,
the activity with a specific counterparty is limited until credit enhancement is provided. Distress in the financial markets could
increase Xcel Energy’s credit risk.
Fair Value Measurements
Xcel Energy follows accounting and disclosure guidance on fair value measurements that contains a hierarchy for inputs used in
measuring fair value and requires disclosure of the observability of the inputs used in these measurements. See Note 11 to the
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the fair value hierarchy and the amounts of assets and liabilities measured at
fair value that have been assigned to Level 3.
Commodity Derivatives — Xcel Energy continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the counterparties to its commodity derivative
contracts and assesses each counterparty’s ability to perform on the transactions set forth in the contracts. Given this assessment and
the typically short duration of these contracts, the impact of discounting commodity derivative assets for counterparty credit risk was
not material to the fair value of commodity derivative assets at Dec. 31, 2013. Adjustments to fair value for credit risk of commodity
trading instruments are recorded in electric revenues. Credit risk adjustments for other commodity derivative instruments are deferred
as OCI or regulatory assets and liabilities. The classification as a regulatory asset or liability is based on commission approved
regulatory recovery mechanisms. Xcel Energy also assesses the impact of its own credit risk when determining the fair value of
commodity derivative liabilities. The impact of discounting commodity derivative liabilities for credit risk was immaterial to the fair
value of commodity derivative liabilities at Dec. 31, 2013.
Commodity derivative assets and liabilities assigned to Level 3 typically consist of FTRs, as well as forwards and options that are
long-term in nature. Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities represent 3.0 percent and 28.7 percent of gross assets and
liabilities, respectively, measured at fair value at Dec. 31, 2013.