Cablevision 2012 Annual Report Download - page 180

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 180 of the 2012 Cablevision annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 220

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • 218
  • 219
  • 220

COMBINED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
I-52
The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, the Company's financial assets and
financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011:
At December 31, 2012:
Level I Level II Level III Total
Assets:
Money market funds ..................................
.
$273,061 $ - $ - $273,061
Investment securities ..................................
.
122 - - 122
Investment securities pledged as collateral .
.
802,834 - - 802,834
Prepaid forward contracts ...........................
.
- 3,143 - 3,143
Liabilities:
Liabilities under derivative contracts:
Prepaid forward contracts .......................
.
- 148,263 - 148,263
At December 31, 2011:
Level I Level II Level III Total
Assets:
Money market funds ..................................
.
$556,853 $ - $ - $556,853
Restricted money market funds ..................
.
27,920 - - 27,920
Investment securities ..................................
.
113 - - 113
Investment securities pledged as collateral .
.
509,234 - - 509,234
Prepaid forward contracts ...........................
.
- 18,617 - 18,617
Liabilities:
Liabilities under derivative contracts:
Prepaid forward contracts .......................
.
- 22,981 - 22,981
Interest rate swap contracts .....................
.
- 55,383 - 55,383
The Company's cash equivalents and restricted cash, investment securities and investment securities
pledged as collateral are classified within Level I of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using
quoted market prices.
The Company's derivative contracts and liabilities under derivative contracts are valued using market-
based inputs to valuation models. These valuation models require a variety of inputs, including
contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, and measures of volatility. When appropriate, valuations
are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit risk considerations. Such
adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. Since model inputs can generally be
verified and do not involve significant management judgment, the Company has concluded that these
instruments should be classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company considers the impact of credit risk when measuring the fair value of its derivative asset
and/or liability positions, as applicable.
In addition, see Note 5 for a discussion of impairment charges related to nonfinancial assets not measured
at fair value on a recurring basis.