Pep Boys 2011 Annual Report Download - page 89

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 89 of the 2011 Pep Boys annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 172

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172

THE PEP BOYS—MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine
the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting
unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to the excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The implied
fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination is determined. The Company allocates the fair value of a reporting unit to all of
the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been
acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts
assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.
There were no impairments as a result of the Company’s annual impairment tests in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2011 or fiscal year 2010.
LEASES The Company amortizes leasehold improvements over the lesser of the lease term or
the economic life of those assets. Generally, for stores the lease term is the base lease term and for
distribution centers the lease term includes the base lease term plus certain renewal option periods for
which renewal is reasonably assured and for which failure to exercise the renewal option would result
in an economic penalty to the Company. The calculation of straight-line rent expense is based on the
same lease term with consideration for step rent provisions, escalation clauses, rent holidays and other
lease concessions. The Company begins expensing rent at the time the Company has the right to use
the property.
SOFTWARE CAPITALIZATION The Company capitalizes certain direct development costs
associated with internal-use software, including external direct costs of material and services, and
payroll costs for employees devoting time to the software projects. These costs are amortized over a
period not to exceed five years beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use. Costs incurred
during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs are expensed as
incurred.
TRADE PAYABLE PROGRAM LIABILITY The Company has a trade payable program which is
funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase account
receivables owed by the Company directly from its vendors. The Company, in turn, makes the regularly
scheduled full vendor payments to the bank participants. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as a result of
the Company’s review, the Company determined that the gross amount of borrowings and payments on
the trade payable program shown on the statement of cash flows under ‘‘Cash flows from financing
activities’’ included certain vendors that had not participated in the trade payable program. As such,
the Company made an equal and offsetting adjustment to reduce the trade payables borrowings and
payments line items within financing activities by $225.2 million and $90.3 million for the years ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively. These adjustments have no net impact on net cash
used in financing activities or on any other cash flow line items.
INCOME TAXES The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Deferred income taxes are determined based upon enacted tax laws and rates applied to the
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
45