Delta Airlines 2011 Annual Report Download - page 44

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 44 of the 2011 Delta Airlines annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 144

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144

We defer revenue from the mileage credit component of passenger ticket sales and recognize it as passenger revenue when miles are redeemed and
services are provided. We record the portion of the passenger ticket sales for air transportation in air traffic liability and recognize these amounts in passenger
revenue when we provide transportation or when the ticket expires unused. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not have a material impact on the timing of
revenue recognition or its classification with regard to passenger tickets earning mileage credits. A hypothetical 10% increase in our estimate of the
standalone selling price of a mileage credit would decrease passenger revenue by approximately $50 million, as a result of an increase in the amount of
revenue deferred from the mileage component of passenger ticket sales.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we used the residual method for revenue recognition. Under the residual method, we determined the fair value of
the mileage credit component based on prices at which we sold mileage credits to other airlines and then considered the remainder of the amount collected to
be the air transportation deliverable.
Sale of Mileage Credits. Customers may earn mileage credits through participating companies such as credit card companies, hotels and car rental
agencies with which we have marketing agreements to sell mileage credits. Our contracts to sell mileage credits under these marketing agreements have two
deliverables: (1) the mileage credits redeemable for future travel and (2) the marketing component.
ASU 2009-13 does not apply to contracts to sell mileage credits entered into prior to January 1, 2011 unless those contracts are materially modified. As of
December 31, 2011, we had not materially modified any of our significant agreements. Our most significant contract to sell mileage credits relates to our co-
brand credit card relationship with American Express. For additional information about this relationship, see Note 6. For contracts entered into prior to
January 1, 2011 that have not been materially modified since January 1, 2011, we continue to use the residual method for revenue recognition and value only
the mileage credits. Under the residual method, the portion of the revenue from the mileage component is deferred and recognized as passenger revenue when
miles are redeemed and services are provided. The portion of the revenue received in excess of the fair value of mileage credits sold, the marketing
component, is recognized in income as other revenue when the related marketing services are provided. The fair value of a mileage credit is determined based
on prices at which we sell mileage credits to other airlines and is re-evaluated at least annually.
If we enter into new contracts or materially modify existing contracts to sell mileage credits related to our SkyMiles Program, we will value the
standalone selling price of the marketing component and allocate the revenue from the contract based on the relative selling price of the mileage credits and
the marketing component. A material modification of an existing contract could impact our deferral rate or cause an adjustment to our deferred revenue
balance, which could materially impact our future financial results.
Breakage. For mileage credits which we estimate are not likely to be redeemed (“Breakage”), we recognize the associated value proportionally during the
period in which the remaining mileage credits are expected to be redeemed. The estimate of Breakage is based on historical redemption patterns. A change in
assumptions as to the period over which mileage credits are expected to be redeemed, the actual redemption activity for mileage credits or the estimated fair
value of mileage credits expected to be redeemed could have a material impact on our revenue in the year in which the change occurs and in future years. At
December 31, 2011 , the aggregate deferred revenue balance associated with the SkyMiles Program was $4.5 billion . A hypothetical 1% change in the
number of outstanding miles estimated to be redeemed would result in a $31 million impact on our deferred revenue liability at December 31, 2011 .
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We apply a fair value-based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis (as of October 1)
and, if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on an interim basis. In September 2011, the FASB issued
"Testing Goodwill for Impairment." The standard revises the way in which entities test goodwill for impairment. We adopted this standard and applied its
provisions to our annual goodwill impairment test in the December 2011 quarter.
Key Assumptions. The key assumptions in our impairment tests include (1) our projected revenues, expenses and cash flows, (2) an estimated weighted
average cost of capital, (3) assumed discount rates depending on the asset and (4) a tax rate. These assumptions are consistent with those hypothetical market
participants would use. Since we are required to make estimates and assumptions when evaluating goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment, the actual amounts may differ materially from these estimates.
38