Sara Lee 2011 Annual Report Download - page 71

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 71 of the 2011 Sara Lee annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

68/69 Sara Lee Corporation and Subsidiaries
Leases The corporation has numerous operating leases for
manufacturing facilities, warehouses, office space, vehicles and
machinery and equipment. Operating lease obligations are sched-
uled to be paid as follows: $58 million in 2012, $43 million in 2013,
$31 million in 2014, $25 million in 2015, $17 million in 2016 and
$69 million thereafter. The corporation is also contingently liable
for certain long-term leases on property operated by others. These
leased properties relate to certain businesses that have been sold.
The corporation continues to be liable for the remaining terms of
the leases on these properties in the event that the owners of the
businesses are unable to satisfy the lease liability. The minimum
annual rentals under these leases are as follows: $15 million in
2012, $11 million in 2013, $10 million in 2014, $8 million in 2015,
$2 million in 2016 and $28 million thereafter.
Future Contractual Obligations and Commitments During 2007,
the corporation exited a U.S. meat production plant that included
a hog slaughtering operation. Certain purchase contracts for the
purchase of live hogs at this facility were not exited or transferred
after the closure of the facility. Under the terms of these contracts,
which are open through June 2012, the corporation will continue to
purchase these live hogs and therefore, the corporation has entered
into a hog sales contract under which these hogs will be sold to
another slaughter operator. The corporation’s purchase price of
these hogs is generally based on the price of corn products, and
the corporation’s selling price for these hogs is generally based on
USDA posted hog prices. Divergent movements in these indices will
result in either gains or losses on these hog transactions. Expected
losses from the sale of these hogs are recognized when the loss is
probable of occurring. At the end of 2011, based on current market
pricing, the corporation deemed that it was not probable that material
future near-term losses would occur. The contractual commitment
for these purchases is included in the table below.
The corporation has no material unconditional purchase
obligations as defined by the accounting principles associated with
the Disclosure of Long-Term Purchase Obligations. The following
table aggregates information on the corporation’s contractual
obligations and commitments:
The corporation’s credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s
Investors Service and FitchRatings, as of July 2, 2011, were
as follows.
Senior
Unsecured Short-term
Obligations Borrowings Outlook
Standard & Poor’s BBB A-2 Stable
Moody’s Baa1 P-2 Negative
FitchRatings BBB F-2 Stable
In January 2011, Moody’s Investor Services placed the company’s
long-term rating under review for possible downgrade, likely limited
to one notch. It also affirmed the company’s P-2 rating on short-
term borrowings.
Changes in the corporation’s credit ratings result in changes in
the corporation’s borrowing costs. The corporation’s current short-
term credit rating allows it to participate in a commercial paper
market that has a number of potential investors and a historically
high degree of liquidity. A downgrade of the corporation’s short-term
credit rating would place the corporation in a commercial paper
market that would contain significantly less market liquidity than it
currently operates in with a rating of “A-2,” “P-2,” or “F-2.” This would
reduce the amount of commercial paper the corporation could issue
and raise its commercial paper borrowing cost and would require
immediate payment or the posting of collateral on the derivative
instruments in net liability positions in accordance with ISDA rules.
See Note 15, “Financial Instruments” for more information. To the
extent that the corporation’s operating requirements were to exceed
its ability to issue commercial paper following a downgrade of its
short-term credit rating, the corporation has the ability to use avail-
able credit facilities to satisfy operating requirements, if necessary.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The off-balance sheet
arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future
effect on the corporation’s financial condition are lease transactions
for facilities, warehouses, office space, vehicles and machinery
and equipment.