Sara Lee 2011 Annual Report Download - page 111

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 111 of the 2011 Sara Lee annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

Level 1 assets were valued using market prices based on daily
net asset value (NAV) or prices available through a public stock
exchange. Level 2 assets were valued primarily using market prices,
derived from either an active market quoted price, which may require
adjustments to account for the attributes of the asset, or an inactive
market transaction. The corporation did not have any level 3 assets,
which would include assets for which values are determined by non-
observable inputs. See Note 15 – Financial Instruments for additional
information as to the fair value hierarchy.
The percentage allocation of pension plan assets based on fair
value as of the respective year-end measurement dates is as follows:
2011 2010
U.S. Plans
Asset category
Equity securities 3% 4%
Debt securities 89 84
Real estate 22
Cash and other 610
Total 100% 100%
International Plans
Asset category
Equity securities 25% 22%
Debt securities 66 69
Real estate 23
Cash and other 76
Total 100% 100%
The overall investment objective is to manage the plan assets
so that they are sufficient to meet the plan’s future obligations
while maintaining adequate liquidity to meet current benefit pay-
ments and operating expenses. The actual amount for which these
obligations will be settled depends on future events and actuarial
assumptions. These assumptions include the life expectancy of
the plan participants and salary inflation. The resulting estimated
future obligations are discounted using an interest rate curve that
represents a return that would be required from high quality corpo-
rate bonds. The corporation has adopted a liability driven investment
(LDI) strategy and it is in various stages of implementation of the
strategy in each of its largest pension plans. This strategy consists
of investing in a portfolio of assets whose performance is driven
by the performance of the associated pension liability. This means
that plan assets managed under an LDI strategy may underperform
general market returns, but should provide for lower volatility of
funded status as its return matches the pension liability movement.
Over time, as pension obligations become better funded, the corpora-
tion will further de-risk its investments and increase the allocation
to fixed income.
The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of pension
benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee service
rendered before the measurement date and based on employee
service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated ben-
efit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it
includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The
accumulated benefit obligations of the corporation’s pension plans as
of the measurement dates in 2011 and 2010 were $1,370 million
and $1,372 million, respectively, for the U.S. plans and $3,049 mil-
lion and $2,875 million, respectively, for the international plans.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation
and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated
benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were:
In millions 2011 2010
U.S. Plans
Projected benefit obligation $1,113 $1,372
Accumulated benefit obligation 1,113 1,372
Fair value of plan assets 987 1,127
International Plans
Projected benefit obligation $÷«294 $1,466
Accumulated benefit obligation 283 1,439
Fair value of plan assets 206 1,268
Plan Assets, Expected Benefit Payments and Funding The fair
value of pension plan assets as of July 2, 2011 for the combined
U.S. and International plans was determined as follows:
Quoted
Prices in
Active Significant
Market for Other
Identical Observable
Total Fair Assets Inputs
In millions Value (Level 1) (Level 2)
Equity securities
Non-U.S. securities – pooled funds $÷«875 $÷«875 $÷÷–
Fixed income securities
Government bonds 804 804
Corporate bonds 1,000 1,000
U.S. pooled funds 157 157
Non-U.S. pooled funds 1,247 665 582
Total fixed income securities 3,208 2,626 582
Real estate 93 93
Cash and equivalents 121 121
Derivatives 49 61 (12)
Other 175 175
Total fair value of assets $4,521 $3,951 $570
108/109 Sara Lee Corporation and Subsidiaries