Motorola 2010 Annual Report Download - page 65

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 65 of the 2010 Motorola annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 144

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144

57
ESP—The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the
product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. When both VSOE and TPE do not exist, the Company
determines ESP for the arrangement element by first collecting all reasonably available data points including
sales, cost and margin analysis of the product, and other inputs based on the Company’s normal pricing
practices. Second, the Company makes any reasonably required adjustments to the data based on market and
Company-specific factors. Third, the Company stratifies the data points, when appropriate, based on
customer, magnitude of the transaction and sales volume.
Once elements of an arrangement are separated into more than one unit of accounting, revenue is recognized
for each separate unit of accounting based on the nature of the revenue as described above.
The Company’s arrangements with multiple deliverables may also contain a stand-alone software deliverable
that is subject to the existing software revenue recognition guidance. The revenue for these multiple-element
arrangements is allocated to the software deliverable and the non-software deliverable(s) based on the relative
selling prices of all of the deliverables in the arrangement using the hierarchy in the new revenue accounting
guidance. In circumstances where the Company cannot determine VSOE or TPE of the selling price for all of the
deliverables in the arrangement, including the software deliverable, ESP is used for the purpose of allocating the
arrangement consideration.
The Company’s arrangements with multiple deliverables may be comprised entirely of deliverables that are all
still subject to the existing software revenue recognition guidance. For these arrangements, revenue is allocated to
the deliverables based on VSOE. Should VSOE not exist for the undelivered software element, revenue is deferred
until either the undelivered element is delivered or VSOE is established for the element, whichever occurs first.
When the fair value of a delivered element has not been established, but fair value exists for the undelivered
elements, the Company uses the residual method to recognize revenue if the fair value of all undelivered elements is
determinable. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining
portion of the arrangement consideration is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue.
Net sales as reported and pro forma net sales that would have been reported during the year ended
December 31, 2010, if the transactions entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2010 were still subject
to the previous accounting guidance are shown in the following table (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2010 As Reported Pro Forma Basis
Net sales $19,282 $15,953
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the difference between the amount of revenue recorded under the new
accounting guidance for revenue recognition as compared to the pro forma amount that would have been recorded
under the prior accounting guidance relates primarily to sales of smart phones by the Company’s Mobile Devices
segment. The pro forma basis revenue reflects the recognition of revenue related to smart phones that contain a
service element and unspecified software upgrade rights under a subscription-based model under which revenue is
recognized ratably over the estimated expected life of the smart phone as the Company was unable to determine
VSOE for the undelivered element in the transaction. The as reported revenue reflects the allocation of revenue
related to smart phones shipped under arrangements executed during the year ended December 31, 2010 using ESP
for the device, the service and the unspecified software upgrade rights, resulting in a lower deferral of revenue than
under prior accounting guidance. Both the as reported revenue and the pro forma basis revenue contain the revenue
recognized under the subscription-based revenue recognition model related to smart phones that contain a service
element and unspecified software that shipped under arrangements executed during the year ended December 31,
2009.
In addition, the pro forma basis revenue reflects a reduction in net sales for multiple-element transactions that
contain an undelivered specified software product or and for which the Company does not have VSOE as all related
revenue would be deferred until the specified software product is delivered or the Company establishes VSOE for
the undelivered specified software product. The as reported revenue reflects the allocation of revenue to the multiple
elements using a relative selling price method with revenue being ascribed to the undelivered elements based on ESP.
Also, the pro forma basis revenue reflects a reduction in net sales for arrangements for which the Company does not
have VSOE for post-contract customer support being provided in a multiple-element arrangement. In these
instances, the net sales are being recognized ratably over the post-contract customer support period. The as reported