The Hartford 2012 Annual Report Download - page 207

Table of Contents




The carrying value of goodwill allocated to reporting units is as follows:
 






 






Property & Casualty
Commercial $30 $(30) $ — $ — $ 30 $(30) $ — $ —
Consumer Markets 119 — — 119 119 — — 119
Mutual Funds [4] 159 —(10) 149 159 — — 159
Talcott Resolution:
Individual Life [4] 224 —(224) — 224 — — 224
Retirement Plans [4] 87 — — 87 87 — — 87
Total Talcott Resolution 311 —(224) 87 311 — — 311
Corporate [3][4] 772 (355) (118)299 787 (355) (15) 417
            
[1] Represents goodwill written off in connection with the sales of WFS and Individual Life.
[2] Represents goodwill written off related to Federal Trust Corporation; see Note 20 - Discontinued Operations for further information.
[3] Carrying value as of December 31, 2012 includes $138, $92 and $69, respectively, for the Group Benefits, Mutual Funds and Retirement Plans
reporting units. Carrying value as of December 31, 2011 includes $138, $92, $118 and $69, respectively, for the Group Benefits, Mutual Funds,
Individual Life and Retirement Plans reporting units.
[4] For further information, see Note 2 - Business Dispositions of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Year ended December 31, 2012
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company determined that a triggering event requiring an impairment assessment had occurred as a result of its decision to
pursue sales or other strategic alternatives for the Individual Life and Retirement Plans reporting units.
The Company completed interim impairment tests during each of the first three quarters of 2012 for the Retirement Plans reporting unit which resulted in no
impairment of goodwill. The annual goodwill assessment for Retirement Plans was completed as of October 31, 2012 and an additional impairment test was
completed as of December 31, 2012 as a result of the anticipated sale of this business unit. No write-down of goodwill resulted for the year ended December
31, 2012. Retirement Plans passed step one of the goodwill impairment tests with a margin of less than 10% between fair value and book value of the reporting
unit as of both dates. The fair value of the Retirement Plans reporting unit as of October 31, 2012 and December 31, 2012 was based on a negotiated
transaction price.
The Company completed interim impairment tests during each of the first three quarters of 2012 for the Individual Life reporting unit which resulted in no
impairment of goodwill in the first and second quarters of 2012. In the third quarter of 2012, the Individual Life reporting unit failed the goodwill impairment
test as the carrying amount of the Individual Life reporting unit's goodwill exceeded the implied goodwill value. Accordingly, an impairment loss of $342 was
recognized, representing the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill. The goodwill impairment loss is included in reinsurance loss on disposition in the
Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the Individual Life reporting unit as of September 30, 2012 was based on a negotiated
transaction price.
The annual goodwill assessment for the Mutual Funds and Consumer Markets reporting units and the Group Benefits reporting unit within Corporate was
completed as of October 31, 2012, which resulted in no write-downs of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2012. The reporting units passed the first
step of their annual impairment test with a significant margin with the exception of the Group Benefits reporting unit. Group Benefits passed the first step of
its annual impairment test with less than a 10% margin. The fair value of the Group Benefits reporting unit is based on discounted cash flows using earnings
projections on in force business and future business growth. There could be a positive or negative impact on the result of step one in future periods if
assumptions change about the level of economic capital, future business growth, earnings projections or the weighted average cost of capital.
F-65