Delta Airlines 2013 Annual Report Download - page 24

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 24 of the 2013 Delta Airlines annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 151

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151

Other laws, regulations, taxes and airport rates and charges have also been imposed from time to time that significantly increase the cost of
airline operations or reduce revenues. The industry is heavily taxed. For example, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act mandates the
federalization of certain airport security procedures and imposes security requirements on airports and airlines, most of which are funded by a
per ticket tax on passengers and a tax on airlines. The federal government has adopted a significant increase in the per ticket tax effective in July
2014 and has recently proposed additional fees. The ticket tax increase and additional taxes and fees, if implemented, could negatively impact
our results of operations.
Proposals to address congestion issues at certain airports or in certain airspace, particularly in the Northeast United States, have included
concepts such as “congestion-based” landing fees, “slot auctions” or other alternatives that could impose a significant cost on the airlines
operating in those airports or airspace and impact the ability of those airlines to respond to competitive actions by other airlines. In addition, the
failure of the federal government to upgrade the U.S. air traffic control system has resulted in delays and disruptions of air traffic during peak
travel periods in certain congested markets. The failure to improve the air traffic control system could lead to increased delays and inefficiencies
in flight operations as demand for U.S. air travel increases, having a material adverse effect on our operations. Failure to update the air traffic
control system in a timely manner, and the substantial funding requirements of an updated system that may be imposed on air carriers, may have
an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Events related to extreme weather delays caused the Department of Transportation to promulgate regulations imposing potentially severe
financial penalties upon airlines that have flights experiencing extended tarmac delays. These regulations could have a negative impact on our
operations in certain circumstances.
Future regulatory action concerning climate change, aircraft emissions and noise emissions could have a significant effect on the airline
industry. For example, the European Commission adopted an emissions trading scheme applicable to all flights operating in the European Union,
including flights to and from the United States. While enforcement of the scheme has been deferred until April 2014, if fully implemented, we
expect that this system would impose additional costs on our operations in the European Union. Other laws or regulations such as this emissions
trading scheme or other U.S. or foreign governmental actions may adversely affect our operations and financial results, either through direct
costs in our operations or through increases in costs for jet fuel that could result from jet fuel suppliers passing on increased costs that they incur
under such a system.
We and other U.S. carriers are subject to domestic and foreign laws regarding privacy of passenger and employee data that are not consistent
in all countries in which we operate. In addition to the heightened level of concern regarding privacy of passenger data in the United States,
certain European government agencies are initiating inquiries into airline privacy practices. Compliance with these regulatory regimes is
expected to result in additional operating costs and could impact our operations and any future expansion. In addition, a security breach in which
passenger or employee data is exposed could result in disruption to our operations, damage to our reputation and significant costs.
Terrorist attacks or international hostilities may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 caused fundamental and permanent changes in the airline industry, including substantial revenue
declines and cost increases, which resulted in industry-
wide liquidity issues. Potential terrorist attacks or security breaches or fear of such events,
even if not made directly on the airline industry, could negatively affect us and the airline industry. The potential negative effects include
increased security (including as a result of our global operations), insurance and other costs and lost revenue from increased ticket refunds and
decreased ticket sales. Our financial resources might not be sufficient to absorb the adverse effects of any further terrorist attacks or other
international hostilities involving the United States.
The rapid spread of contagious illnesses can have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The rapid spread of a contagious illness can have a material adverse effect on the demand for worldwide air travel and therefore have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Moreover, our operations could be negatively affected if employees are
quarantined as the result of exposure to a contagious illness. Similarly, travel restrictions or operational problems resulting from the rapid spread
of contagious illnesses in any part of the world in which we operate may have a materially adverse impact on our business and results of
operations.
18