Delta Airlines 2002 Annual Report Download - page 25

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 25 of the 2002 Delta Airlines annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 200

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200

During Delta's 2001 and 2000 fiscal years and through March 6, 2002,
Delta did not consult Deloitte & Touche LLP with respect to the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed,
or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Delta's consolidated
financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events listed in Items
304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by this item is set forth under "Certain
Information About Nominees" on pages 5-6, and under "Section 16 Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance" on page 50, of Delta's Proxy Statement dated
March 25, 2003, and is incorporated by reference. Certain information regarding
executive officers is contained in Part I of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this item is set forth under "Compensation of
Directors" on pages 9-10, under "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation" on page 10, and on pages 19-29, of Delta's Proxy Statement dated
March 25, 2003, and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this item is set forth under "Beneficial
Ownership of Securities" on pages 10-12, and under "Equity Compensation Plan
Information" on page 30, of Delta's Proxy Statement dated March 25, 2003, and is
incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Not applicable.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Based on their evaluation of Delta's disclosure controls and procedures
conducted within 90 days of the date of filing this report on Form 10-K, Delta's
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that Delta's disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material
information required to be included in this report on Form 10-K. There were no
significant changes in Delta's internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
22