Lexmark 2008 Annual Report Download - page 31

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 31 of the 2008 Lexmark annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

experiencing in its OEM business. The Company continues to invest in its core print technologies and
product development that is expected to drive a strong pipeline of future Lexmark products.
2007
Beginning in the second quarter of 2007, ISD experienced on-going declines in inkjet supplies and OEM
unit sales, lower average unit revenues (“AURs”) and additional costs in its new products. As the Company
analyzed the situation, it saw that some of its unit sales were not generating adequate lifetime profitability,
some markets and channels were on the low-end of the supplies generation distribution curve and its sales
were too skewed to the low-end versus the market.
As a result, the Company decided to more aggressively shift the Company’s focus to geographic regions,
market segments, and customers that generate higher page usage and minimize the unit sales that do not
generate an acceptable profit over their life.
Refer to the section entitled “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” that follows for a further discussion of the
Company’s results of operations.
Trends and Opportunities
Lexmark management believes that the total distributed output opportunity was between $90 and
$100 billion in 2008, including hardware, supplies and related software and services. This opportunity
includes printers and multifunction devices as well as a declining base of copiers and fax machines that are
increasingly being integrated into multifunction devices. Based on industry information, Lexmark
management estimates that the market may have declined slightly in 2008 and may decline again in
2009 due to the severe global economic slowdown. When global economic growth resumes, perhaps in
2010, the industry could again experience low to mid-single digit annual revenue growth rates with highest
growth likely to be in MFPs and related software solutions and services and emerging economies.
Market trends driving long-term growth include:
Continuing improvement in price/performance points;
Increased adoption of color and graphics output in business;
Advancements in electronic movement of information, driving more pages to be printed by end
users when and where it is convenient to do so;
Continued convergence in technology between printers, scanners, copiers and fax machines into
single, integrated AIO devices; and
Advancements in digital photography driving the opportunity to print digital images on distributed
output devices.
As a result of these market trends, Lexmark has growth opportunities in monochrome laser printers, color
lasers, laser MFPs and inkjet AIOs.
Industry laser printer unit growth in recent years has generally exceeded the growth rate of laser printer
revenue due to unit growth in lower-priced desktop color and monochrome laser printers and unit price
reductions. Additionally, color and multifunction laser printer units represent a more significant component
of laser unit growth. Management believes these trends will continue. Product pricing pressure is partially
offset by the tendency of customers in the shared workgroup laser market to add higher profit margin
optional features.
In the inkjet product market, advances in inkjet technology have resulted in products with higher resolution
and improved performance while increased competition has led to lower prices. Also, there is an increasing
trend in inkjet products being designed for SOHO and small business. Additionally, over the past couple of
years, the number of customers seeking productivity-related features has driven significant growth in AIO
products. Key factors promoting this trend are greater affordability of AIOs containing productivity features.
25