Berkshire Hathaway 2006 Annual Report Download - page 7

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 7 of the 2006 Berkshire Hathaway annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 82

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82

In September, Charlie and I, along with five Berkshire associates, visited ISCAR in Israel. We –
and I mean every one of us – have never been more impressed with any operation. At ISCAR, as
throughout Israel, brains and energy are ubiquitous. Berkshire shareholders are lucky to have joined with
Eitan, Jacob, Danny and their talented associates.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
A few months later, Berkshire again became “the buyer of choice” in a deal brought to us by my
friend, John Roach, of Fort Worth. John, many of you will remember, was Chairman of Justin Industries,
which we bought in 2000. At that time John was helping John Justin, who was terminally ill, find a
permanent home for his company. John Justin died soon after we bought Justin Industries, but it has since
been run exactly as we promised him it would be.
Visiting me in November, John Roach brought along Paul Andrews, Jr., owner of about 80% of
TTI, a Fort Worth distributor of electronic components. Over a 35-year period, Paul built TTI from
$112,000 of sales to $1.3 billion. He is a remarkable entrepreneur and operator.
Paul, 64, loves running his business. But not long ago he happened to witness how disruptive the
death of a founder can be both to a private company’ s employees and the owner’ s family. What starts out
as disruptive, furthermore, often evolves into destructive. About a year ago, therefore, Paul began to think
about selling TTI. His goal was to put his business in the hands of an owner he had carefully chosen, rather
than allowing a trust officer or lawyer to conduct an auction after his death.
Paul rejected the idea of a “strategic” buyer, knowing that in the pursuit of “synergies,” an owner
of that type would be apt to dismantle what he had so carefully built, a move that would uproot hundreds of
his associates (and perhaps wound TTI’ s business in the process). He also ruled out a private equity firm,
which would very likely load the company with debt and then flip it as soon as possible.
That left Berkshire. Paul and I met on the morning of November 15th and made a deal before
lunch. Later he wrote me: “After our meeting, I am confident that Berkshire is the right owner for TTI . . .
I am proud of our past and excited about our future.” And so are Charlie and I.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
We also made some “tuck-in” acquisitions during 2006 at Fruit of the Loom (“Fruit”), MiTek,
CTB, Shaw and Clayton. Fruit made the largest purchases. First, it bought Russell Corp., a leading
producer of athletic apparel and uniforms for about $1.2 billion (including assumed debt) and in December
it agreed to buy the intimate apparel business of VF Corp. Together, these acquisitions add about $2.2
billion to Fruit’ s sales and bring with them about 23,000 employees.
Charlie and I love it when we can acquire businesses that can be placed under managers, such as
John Holland at Fruit, who have already shown their stuff at Berkshire. MiTek, for example, has made 14
acquisitions since we purchased it in 2001, and Gene Toombs has delivered results from these deals far in
excess of what he had predicted. In effect, we leverage the managerial talent already with us by these tuck-
in deals. We will make many more.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
We continue, however, to need “elephants” in order for us to use Berkshire’ s flood of incoming
cash. Charlie and I must therefore ignore the pursuit of mice and focus our acquisition efforts on much
bigger game.
Our exemplar is the older man who crashed his grocery cart into that of a much younger fellow
while both were shopping. The elderly man explained apologetically that he had lost track of his wife and
was preoccupied searching for her. His new acquaintance said that by coincidence his wife had also
wandered off and suggested that it might be more efficient if they jointly looked for the two women.
Agreeing, the older man asked his new companion what his wife looked like. “She’ s a gorgeous blonde,”
the fellow answered, “with a body that would cause a bishop to go through a stained glass window, and
she’ s wearing tight white shorts. How about yours?” The senior citizen wasted no words: “Forget her,
we’ ll look for yours.”
6