OfficeMax 2015 Annual Report Download - page 47

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 47 of the 2015 OfficeMax annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 136

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136

Table of Contents
Vendor arrangements — Inventory purchases from vendors are generally under arrangements that automatically renew until cancelled with periodic updates
or annual negotiated agreements. Many of these arrangements require the vendors to make payments to us or provide credits to be used against purchases if
and when certain conditions are met. We refer to these arrangements as “vendor programs. Vendor programs fall into two broad categories, with some
underlying sub-categories. The first category is volume-based rebates. Under those arrangements, our product costs per unit decline as higher volumes of
purchases are reached. Current accounting rules provide that companies with a reasonable basis for estimating their full year purchases, and therefore the
ultimate rebate level, can use that estimate to value inventory and cost of goods sold throughout the year. We believe our history of purchases with many
vendors provides us with a basis for our estimates of purchase volume. If the anticipated volume of purchases is not reached, however, or if we form the belief
at any point in the year that it is not likely to be reached, cost of goods sold and the remaining inventory balances are adjusted to reflect that change in our
outlook. We review sales projections and related purchases against vendor program estimates at least quarterly and adjust these balances accordingly.
The second broad category of arrangements with our vendors is event-based programs. These arrangements can take many forms, including advertising
support, special pricing offered by certain of our vendors for a limited time, payments for special placement or promotion of a product, reimbursement of costs
incurred to launch a vendor’s product, and various other special programs. These payments are classified as a reduction of costs of goods sold or inventory,
based on the nature of the program and the sell-through of the inventory. Some arrangements may meet the specific, incremental, identifiable cost criteria that
allow for direct operating expense offset, but such arrangements are not significant.
Vendor programs are recognized throughout the year based on judgment and estimates and amounts due from vendors are generally settled throughout the
year based on purchase volumes. The final amounts due from vendors are generally known soon after year-end. Substantially all vendor program receivables
outstanding at the end of the year are settled within the three months following year-end. We believe that our historical collection rates of these receivables
provide a sound basis for our estimates of anticipated vendor payments throughout the year.
Inventory valuationInventories are valued at the lower of weighted average cost or market value. We monitor active inventory for excessive quantities
and slow-moving items and record adjustments as necessary to lower the value if the anticipated realizable amount is below cost. We also identify
merchandise that we plan to discontinue or have begun to phase out and assess the estimated recoverability of the carrying value. This includes consideration
of the quantity of the merchandise, the rate of sale, and our assessment of current and projected market conditions and anticipated vendor programs. If
necessary, we record a charge to cost of sales to reduce the carrying value of this merchandise to our estimate of the lower of cost or realizable amount.
Additional promotional activities may be initiated and markdowns may be taken as considered appropriate until the product is sold or otherwise disposed.
Estimates and judgments are required in determining what items to stock and at what level, and what items to discontinue and how to value them prior to
sale.
We also recognize an expense in cost of sales for our estimate of physical inventory loss from theft, short shipments and other factors — referred to as
inventory shrink. During the year, we adjust the estimate of our inventory shrink rate accrual following on-hand adjustments and our physical inventory
count results. These changes in estimates may result in volatility within the year or impact comparisons to other periods.
Long-lived asset impairments — Long-lived assets with identifiable cash flows are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We access recovery of the asset or asset groups using estimates of cash
flows directly associated with the future use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset groups. If undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the
asset, an impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value (generally, the discounted cash flows or its salvage value) and its
carrying value, and any costs of disposition. Factors that could trigger an impairment assessment include, among others, a significant change in the extent or
manner in which an asset is used or the business climate that could affect the value of the asset. As integration activities continue, the Company may identify
assets or asset groups for sale or abandonment and incur impairment charges.
45