Kroger 2011 Annual Report Download - page 49

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 49 of the 2011 Kroger annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

47
AD V I S O R Y VO T E O N EX E C U T I V E CO M P E N S A T I O N
(IT E M NO. 2)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we
give our shareholders the right to vote to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our
named executive officers as disclosed earlier in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.
As discussed earlier in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our compensation philosophy is to:
make total compensation competitive;
include opportunities for equity ownership as part of compensation; and
use incentive compensation to help drive performance by providing superior pay for superior results.
Furthermore, as previously disclosed, an increased percentage of total potential compensation is
performance-based as opposed to time-based as half of the compensation previously awarded to the named
executive officers as restricted stock (and earned based on the passage of time) is now only earned to the
extent that performance goals are achieved. In addition, annual and long-term cash bonuses are performance-
based and earned only to the extent that performance goals are achieved. In tying a large portion of executive
compensation to achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals, we seek to closely
align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders.
The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation. Rather, the
vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. The
vote is advisory. This means that the vote is not binding on Kroger. The Compensation Committee of our
Board of Directors is responsible for establishing executive compensation. In so doing that Committee will
consider, along with all other relevant factors, the results of this vote.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and represented in person or by proxy is required
to approve this proposal. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the outcome of this vote.
We ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed
pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
compensation tables, and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.
TH E BO A R D O F DI R E C T O R S RE C O M M E N D S A VO T E F O R TH I S PR O P O S A L .
SE L E C T I O N O F AU D I T O R S
(IT E M NO. 3)
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the appointment, compensation and
retention of Kroger’s independent auditor, as required by law and by applicable NYSE rules. On March 7, 2012,
the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Kroger’s independent auditor for the fiscal
year ending February 2, 2013. While shareholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as Kroger’s independent auditor is not required by Krogers Regulations or otherwise, the Board of Directors is
submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to shareholders for ratification, as it has in past years,
as a good corporate governance practice. If the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee
may, but is not required to, reconsider whether to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit
Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different auditor at any time during the year if it
determines that such a change would be in the best interests of Kroger and its shareholders.
A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the meeting to respond to
appropriate questions and to make a statement if he or she desires to do so.
TH E BO A R D O F DI R E C T O R S RE C O M M E N D S A VO T E F O R TH I S PR O P O S A L .