Logitech 2014 Annual Report Download - page 103

These material weaknesses, as well as the Company’s plans to remediate them, are set forth in Item 9A of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 and in Item 9A of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014. Accordingly, the reports of
PwC LLP on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013 and as of March 31,
2014 as well as management’s reports as of the same date, which were included in the Company’s Annual Reports
on Form 10-K for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014, respectively, contained qualified opinions thereon. The material
weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that the Company disclosed in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year 2014 continued to exist during the subsequent interim period through
November 6, 2014.
The Audit Committee discussed the subject matter of the reportable events with PwC. Other than as disclosed
above, there were no reportable events during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and through the
subsequent interim period through November 6, 2014.
Logitech provided PwC with a copy of the disclosure set forth in this section, which disclosure was set forth
in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on November 13, 2014. PwC furnished Logitech with a
letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating their agreement with such disclosure. A copy
of the letter was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to such Current Report on Form 8-K.
Information about KPMG LLP
On November 12, 2014, the Audit Committee appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) to serve as its new
independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year
ending March 31, 2015. KPMG’s engagement to serve as the Company’s new independent registered public
accounting firm became effective on November 13, 2014.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and prior to engaging
KPMG, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted KPMG regarding either: (i) the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that
might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, in connection with which either a written report or oral
advice was provided to the Company that KPMG concluded was an important factor considered by the Company
in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the
subject of a disagreement or reportable event as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and Item 304(a)(1)
(v), respectively.
The Company authorized PwC to respond fully and without limitation to all requests of KPMG concerning all
matters related to the audited periods by PwC, including with respect to the subject matter of the reportable events
summarized above.
ENglISH
87