Quest Diagnostics 2005 Annual Report Download - page 48

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 48 of the 2005 Quest Diagnostics annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 118

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR’’ PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Some statements and disclosures in this document are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and can be identified by
the use of words such as “may’’, “believe’’, “will’’, “expect’’, “project’’, “estimate’’, “anticipate’’, “plan’’ or
“continue’’. These forward-looking statements are based on our current plans and expectations and are subject to
a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly cause our plans and expectations, including actual
results, to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, or the Litigation Reform Act, provides a “safe harbor’’ for forward-looking statements to encourage
companies to provide prospective information about their companies without fear of litigation.
We would like to take advantage of the “safe harbor’’ provisions of the Litigation Reform Act in
connection with the forward-looking statements included in this document. Investors are cautioned not to unduly
rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this document. The
following important factors could cause our actual financial results to differ materially from those projected,
forecasted or estimated by us in forward-looking statements:
(a) Heightened competition, including increased pricing pressure, competition from hospitals for testing for
non-patients and competition from physicians. See “Business – Competition’’.
(b) Impact of changes in payer mix, including any shift from fee-for-service to capitated fee arrangements.
See “Business – Payers and Customers – Healthcare Insurers’’.
(c) Adverse actions by government or other third-party payers, including unilateral reduction of fee
schedules payable to us, competitive bidding, or an increase in the practice of negotiating for exclusive
arrangements that involve aggressively priced capitated payments by healthcare insurers or other payers.
See “Business – Regulation of Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services’’ and “Business –
Payers and Customers – Healthcare Insurers’’.
(d) The impact upon our testing volume and collected revenue or general or administrative expenses
resulting from our compliance with Medicare and Medicaid administrative policies and requirements of
third party payers. These include:
(1) the requirements of Medicare carriers to provide diagnosis codes for many commonly ordered tests
and the possibility that third party payers will increasingly adopt similar requirements;
(2) the policy of CMS to limit Medicare reimbursement for tests contained in automated chemistry
panels to the amount that would have been paid if only the covered tests, determined on the basis
of demonstrable “medical necessity’’, had been ordered;
(3) continued inconsistent practices among the different local carriers administering Medicare;
(4) inability to obtain from patients an advance beneficiary notice form for tests that cannot be billed
without prior receipt of the form; and
(5) the potential need to monitor charges and lower certain fees to Medicare to comply with the
OIG’s proposed rule pertaining to exclusion of providers for submitting claims to Medicare
containing charges that are substantially in excess of the provider’s usual charges.
See “Business – Regulation of Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services’’ and “Business –
Billing’’.
(e) Adverse results from pending or future government investigations, lawsuits or private actions. These
include, in particular significant monetary damages, loss or suspension of licenses, and/or suspension or
exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and/or other significant litigation matters. See
“Business – Government Investigations and Related Claims’’.
(f) Failure to efficiently integrate acquired businesses, and to manage the costs related to any such
integration, or to retain key technical and management personnel. See “Business – Corporate Strategy
and Growth Opportunities – Growth’’.
(g) Inability to obtain professional liability or other insurance coverage or a material increase in premiums
for such coverage or reserves for self-insurance. See “Business – Insurance’’.
31