Pizza Hut 2005 Annual Report Download - page 36

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 36 of the 2005 Pizza Hut annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 82

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82

Company-owned฀restaurants฀only.฀U.S.฀same฀store฀sales฀for฀
Long฀John฀Silver’s฀andA&Wrestaurantsarenotincluded.฀
Following฀are฀the฀same฀store฀sales฀growth฀results฀by฀brand:
Same฀฀ ฀ Average฀
Store฀฀ ฀ Guest฀
2005 Sales฀ Transactions฀ Check
KFC฀ 6% ฀ 5%฀ 1%
Pizza฀Hut฀ ฀ —%฀ (5)%฀ 5%
Taco฀Bell฀ 7%฀ ฀ 3%฀ 4%
Same฀฀ ฀ Average฀
Store฀฀ ฀ Guest฀
2004฀ Sales฀ Transactions฀ ฀Check
KFC฀ ฀ (2)%฀ (4)%฀ 2%
Pizza฀Hut฀ ฀ 5%฀ 2%฀ 3%
Taco฀Bell฀ ฀ 5%฀ 3%฀ 2%
In฀ 2005฀ and฀ 2004,฀ blended฀ Company฀ same฀ store฀ sales฀
increased฀ 4%฀ and฀ 3%,฀ respectively,฀ due฀ to฀ increases฀ in฀
average฀guest฀check฀and฀transactions.
In฀2005฀and฀2004,฀the฀increase฀in฀U.S.฀franchise฀and฀
license฀ fees฀ was฀ driven฀ by฀ new฀ unit฀ development,฀ same฀
store sales growth and refranchising,partially offset by฀
store฀closures.
In฀2005,฀the฀decrease฀in฀International฀Division฀Company฀
sales฀ was฀ driven฀ by฀ refranchising฀ (primarily฀ our฀ Puerto฀
Rico฀business)and฀storeclosures,partially฀offset฀bynew฀
unit฀ development.฀ In฀ 2004,฀ the฀ increase฀ in฀ International฀
Division฀Company฀sales฀was฀drivenby฀acquisitions฀offran-
chisee฀ restaurants฀ (primarily฀ cer tain฀ units฀ in฀ Canada฀ we฀
now฀operate),new฀unit฀development฀and฀same฀store฀sales฀
growth,฀partially฀offset฀by฀refranchising฀and฀store฀closures.
In2005,theincrease inInternational Divisionfran-
chise฀and฀licensefeeswas฀driven฀by฀new฀unitdevelopment,฀
refranchising฀ (primarily฀ our฀ Puerto฀ Rico฀ business),฀ and
royalty฀rateincreases.฀In฀2004,฀theincreasein฀International
Division฀franchise฀and฀licensefees฀was฀driven฀bynewunit฀
development,same฀store฀sales฀growth฀andrefranchising,฀
partiallyoffsetby฀ storeclosures฀ andouracquisitionsof฀
franchiseerestaurants(primarilycertainunitsin฀Canada
which฀we฀now฀operate).
In฀2005,฀the฀increase฀in฀China฀Division฀Company฀sales฀
was฀drivenby฀new฀unit฀development,฀partially฀offsetby฀the฀
impact฀of฀same฀store฀sales฀declines฀driven฀by฀the฀mainland฀
China฀ supplier฀ ingredient฀ issue฀ and฀ consumer฀ concerns฀
related฀to฀Avian฀Flu.฀In฀2004,฀the฀increase฀in฀China฀Division฀
Companysales฀ was฀ driven฀ by฀ new unitdevelopment and฀
same฀store฀sales฀growth.
In2005,theincreaseinChinaDivision฀franchiseand฀
license฀fees฀was฀driven฀bynew฀unit฀development,฀partially฀
offset฀by฀the฀impact฀of฀same฀store฀sales฀declines฀driven฀by฀
the฀mainland฀China฀supplier฀ingredient฀issue฀and฀consumer฀
concerns฀related฀to฀Avian฀Flu.฀In฀2004,฀the฀increase฀in฀China฀
Division฀franchise฀and฀licensefees฀wasprimarily฀driven฀by฀
new฀unit฀development.
COMPANY฀RESTAURANT฀MARGINS
฀ Inter-฀
฀ national฀฀ China฀
2005 U.S.฀ Division฀ ฀Division฀ Worldwide
Company฀sales฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%
Food฀and฀paper฀ 29.8฀ 33.1฀ 36.2฀ 31.4
Payroll฀and฀employee฀฀
฀ benefits฀ 30.2฀ 24.1฀ 13.3฀ 26.4
Occupancy฀and฀other฀฀
฀ operating฀expenses฀ 26.2฀ 30.7฀ 33.1฀ 28.2
Company฀restaurant฀margin฀ 13.8%฀ 12.1%฀ 17.4%฀ 14.0%
฀ Inter-฀
฀ national฀฀ China฀
2004 U.S.฀ Division฀ ฀Division฀ Worldwide
Company฀sales฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%
Food฀and฀paper฀ 29.9฀ 33.8฀ 37.1฀ 31.8
Payroll฀and฀employee฀฀
benefits฀ 30.5฀ 23.8฀ 11.5฀ 26.4
Occupancy฀and฀other฀฀
operating฀expenses฀ 25.8฀ 29.4฀ 31.1฀ 27.3
Company฀restaurant฀margin฀ 13.8%฀ 13.0%฀ 20.3%฀ 14.5%
฀ Inter-฀
฀ national฀฀ China฀
2003 U.S.฀ Division฀ ฀Division฀ Worldwide
Company฀sales฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%฀ 100.0%
Food฀and฀paper฀ 28.8฀ 34.1฀ 38.0฀ 30.9
Payroll฀and฀employee฀฀
benefits฀ 31.0฀ 23.8฀ 10.7฀ 27.2
Occupancy฀and฀other฀฀
operating฀expenses฀ 25.6฀ 29.1฀ 31.5฀ 27.1
Company฀restaurant฀margin฀ 14.6%฀ 13.0%฀ 19.8%฀ 14.8%
In฀2005,฀U.S.฀restaurant฀margins฀as฀a฀percentage฀of฀sales฀
were฀flat฀compared฀to฀2004.฀The฀impact฀of฀same฀store฀sales฀
growth฀on฀restaurant฀margin฀was฀offset฀by฀higher฀occupancy฀
and othercosts. Higheroccupancy฀ and฀ othercostswere฀
driven฀by฀increases฀in฀utility฀costs฀and฀advertising฀costs.฀
A฀favorableimpactfrom฀ the53rdweek(13฀basis฀ points)฀
was฀ offset฀ by฀ the฀ unfavorable฀ impact฀ of฀ the฀ adoption฀ of฀
SFAS฀123R฀(17฀basis฀points).
In2004,the฀decrease฀inU.S.฀restaurantmargins฀as฀
a฀percentage฀of฀sales฀was฀driven฀by฀higher฀food฀and฀paper฀
costs฀and฀higher฀occupancy฀and฀other฀costs,฀partially฀offset฀
by฀ the฀ impact฀ of฀ same฀ store฀ sales฀ growth฀ on฀ restaurant฀
margin.฀Higher฀food฀and฀paper฀costs฀were฀primarily฀driven฀by฀
increased฀commodity฀costs฀(principally฀cheese฀and฀meats)฀
and฀higher฀occupancy฀and฀other฀costs฀were฀primarily฀driven฀
by฀increased฀expense฀resulting฀from฀the฀adjustment฀related฀
to฀our฀accountingfor฀leases฀and฀the฀depreciation฀of฀lease-
hold฀improvements.
In฀ 2005,฀ the฀ decrease฀ in฀ the฀ International฀ Division฀
restaurant฀ margins฀ as฀ a฀ percentage฀ of฀ sales฀ included฀ a฀
51฀basis฀ point฀ unfavorable฀ impact฀ of฀ refranchising฀ our฀
restaurants฀in฀Puerto฀Rico.฀Also฀contributing฀to฀the฀decrease฀
40.฀ ฀ ฀ |฀ ฀ ฀ Yum!฀Brands,฀Inc.