Rosetta Stone 2010 Annual Report Download - page 37

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 37 of the 2010 Rosetta Stone annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 153

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153

Table of Contents
compliance costs and have made some activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition, we incur additional costs associated with our public company
reporting requirements. These rules and regulations also make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. We
estimate that the incremental annual public company costs will be between $1.5 million and $2.0 million in fiscal 2011, which will primarily be reflected in
general and administrative costs. However, these estimates may prove to be inaccurate as many of these costs are beyond our control, and the actual
incremental costs associated with our public company status could materially exceed our estimates. If our profitability is harmed by these additional costs, it
could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock
could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business.
If one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of or recommendations regarding our stock, or if one or more of the analysts
cease providing research coverage on our stock, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease providing research coverage on our
stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Provisions in our organizational documents and in the Delaware General Corporation Law may prevent takeover attempts that could be beneficial to our
stockholders.
Provisions in our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws, and in the Delaware General
Corporation Law, may make it difficult and expensive for a third-party to pursue a takeover attempt we oppose even if a change in control of our company
would be beneficial to the interests of our stockholders. Any provision of our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation or second amended and
restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a
premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock. Our board of
directors has the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the powers, preferences and rights of each series
without stockholder approval. The ability to issue preferred stock could discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or make it more difficult for a third party
to gain control of our company, or otherwise could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Further, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject
to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This section generally prohibits us from engaging in mergers and other business combinations with
stockholders that beneficially own 15% or more of our voting stock, or with their affiliates, unless our directors or stockholders approve the business
combination in the prescribed manner. However, because funds affiliated with ABS Capital Partners and Norwest acquired their shares prior to our initial
public offering, Section 203 is currently inapplicable to any business combination or transaction with them or their affiliates. In addition, our second amended
and restated certificate of incorporation includes a classified board of directors and requires that any action to be taken by stockholders must be taken at a duly
called meeting of stockholders and may not be taken by written consent. Our second amended and restated bylaws require that any stockholder proposals or
nominations for election to our board of directors must meet specific advance notice requirements and procedures, which make it more difficult for our
stockholders to make proposals or director nominations.
35