Quest Diagnostics 2006 Annual Report Download - page 35

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 35 of the 2006 Quest Diagnostics annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 131

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131

clients. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, establishes procedures and continuously
evaluates and implements changes to the reimbursement process.
We believe that most of our bad debt expense, which was 3.9% of our net revenues in 2006, is primarily
the result of missing or incorrect billing information on requisitions received from healthcare providers and the
failure of patients to pay the portion of the receivable that is their responsibility rather than credit related issues.
In general, we perform the requested tests and report test results regardless of whether the billing information is
incorrect or missing. We subsequently attempt to contact the healthcare provider or patient to obtain any missing
information and rectify incorrect billing information. Missing or incorrect information on requisitions complicates
and slows down the billing process, creates backlogs of unbilled requisitions, and generally increases the aging of
accounts receivable and bad debt expense (see “Regulation of Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services”).
The increased use of electronic ordering reduces the incidence of missing or incorrect information. See “Recent
Changes in Payer Relationships” for a discussion of our billing to UNH and its members.
Competition
While there has been significant consolidation in the clinical laboratory testing industry in recent years, our
industry remains fragmented and highly competitive. We primarily compete with three types of laboratory
providers: hospital-affiliated laboratories, other commercial clinical laboratories and physician-office laboratories.
We are the leading clinical laboratory testing provider in the United States, with net revenues of $6.3 billion
during 2006, and facilities in substantially all of the country’s major metropolitan areas. Our largest competitor is
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Inc. In addition, we compete with many smaller regional and local
commercial clinical laboratories, specialized esoteric labs, as well as laboratories owned by physicians and
hospitals (see “Payers and Customers”).
We believe that healthcare providers consider a number of factors when selecting a laboratory, including:
service capability and quality;
accuracy, timeliness and consistency in reporting test results;
number and type of tests performed by the laboratory;
number, convenience and geographic coverage of patient service centers;
reputation in the medical community; and
pricing.
We believe that we are an effective competitor in each of these areas.
We believe that large commercial clinical laboratories may be able to increase their share of the overall
clinical laboratory testing market due to their large service networks and lower cost structures. These advantages
should enable larger clinical laboratories to more effectively serve large customers and members of large
healthcare plans. In addition, we believe that consolidation in the clinical laboratory testing industry will
continue. However, a majority of the clinical laboratory testing is likely to continue to be performed by
hospitals, which generally have affiliations with community physicians that refer testing to us (see “Payers and
Customers – Hospitals”). As a result of these affiliations, we compete against hospital-affiliated laboratories
primarily on the basis of service capability and quality as well as other non-pricing factors. Our failure to provide
service superior to hospital-affiliated laboratories and other laboratories could have a material adverse effect on
our net revenues and profitability.
The diagnostic testing industry is faced with changing technology and new product introductions. Advances
in technology may lead to the development of more cost-effective tests that can be performed outside of a
commercial clinical laboratory such as (1) near patient tests that can be performed by physicians in their offices;
(2) esoteric tests that can be performed by hospitals in their own laboratories; and (3) home testing that can be
carried out without requiring the services of clinical laboratories. Development of such technology and its use by
our customers and patients would reduce the demand for our laboratory testing services and negatively impact
our net revenues (see “Regulation of Clinical Laboratory Operations”). However, as a result of our acquisition of
HemoCue, Focus Diagnostics and Enterix, we believe that we are well positioned to service this market for
physicians and hospitals. We also believe that our overall near patient strategy will strengthen our relationship
with our customers by enabling us to offer more solutions that improve their effectiveness and the care of their
patients by enabling faster diagnosis and treatment. See “Recent Acquisitions”.
14