GameStop 2006 Annual Report Download - page 92

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 92 of the 2006 GameStop annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 116

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116

Approximate rental expenses under operating leases were as follows:
53 Weeks
Ended
February 3,
2007
52 Weeks
Ended
January 28,
2006
52 Weeks
Ended
January 29,
2005
(In thousands)
Minimum ....................................... $226,974 $126,562 $76,466
Percentage rentals. ................................ 13,819 8,620 4,471
$240,793 $135,182 $80,937
Future minimum annual rentals, excluding percentage rentals, required under leases that had initial, non-
cancelable lease terms greater than one year, as of February 3, 2007 are approximately:
Year Ended Amount
(In thousands)
January 2008 ....................................................... $219,008
January 2009 ....................................................... 187,702
January 2010 ....................................................... 145,437
January 2011 ....................................................... 101,116
January 2012 ....................................................... 68,552
Thereafter ......................................................... 136,954
$858,769
11. Litigation
On October 19, 2004, Milton Diaz filed a complaint against a subsidiary of EB in the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of New York. Mr. Diaz claimed to represent a group of current and former employees to whom
Electronics Boutique of America Inc. (“EBOA”) allegedly failed to pay minimum wages and overtime compen-
sation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York law. The plaintiff, joined by four other
former employees, moved to conditionally certify a group of similarly situated individuals under the FLSA and in
March 2005, there was a hearing on this motion. In March 2005, plaintiffs filed a motion on behalf of current and
former store managers and assistant store managers in New York to certify a class under New York wage and hour
laws. In August 2005, EBOA filed a motion for summary judgment as to certain claims and renewed its request that
certification of the claims be denied. On October 17, 2005, the District Court issued an Order denying plaintiffs’
request for conditional certification under the FLSA and for class certification of plaintiffs’ New York claims.
Plaintiffs requested permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to appeal the District Court’s Order
denying class certification of their New York claims. EBOAs summary judgment motion was scheduled to be heard
in December 2005. Before the hearing on the summary judgment motion, the parties agreed to attempt to resolve the
matter without further litigation. The matter now has been resolved and both the District Court and Second Circuit
proceedings have been dismissed with prejudice. The settlement did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.
On February 14, 2005, and as amended, Steve Strickland, as personal representative of the Estate of Arnold
Strickland, deceased, Henry Mealer, as personal representative of the Estate of Ace Mealer, deceased, and Willie
Crump, as personal representative of the Estate of James Crump, deceased, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against
GameStop, Sony, Take-Two Interactive, Rock Star Games and Wal-Mart (collectively, the “Defendants”) and Devin
Moore in the Circuit Court of Fayette County, Alabama, alleging that Defendants’ actions in designing, manu-
facturing, marketing and supplying Defendant Moore with violent video games were negligent and contributed to
Defendant Moore killing Arnold Strickland, Ace Mealer and James Crump. Plaintiffs are seeking damages of
$600,000 under the Alabama wrongful death statute and punitive damages. GameStop and the other defendants
intend to vigorously defend this action. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case on various grounds, which
F-24
GAMESTOP CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)