Advance Auto Parts 2004 Annual Report Download - page 39
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 39 of the 2004 Advance Auto Parts annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.AdvanceAutoParts,Inc.andSubsidiaries
37
Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently
Occurring Events and Transactions.” This statement also
amendsFASBStatementNo.13,“AccountingforLeases,”
to eliminate an inconsistency between the required
accountingforsale-leasebacktransactionsandtherequired
accounting for certain lease modifications that have eco-
nomic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transac-
tions. Additional amendments include changes to other
existing authoritative pronouncements to make various
technical corrections, clarify meanings or describe their
applicability under changed conditions. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 145 during the first quarter of fiscal
2003.Forthefiscalyearsended2004,2003and2002,the
Companyrecordedlossesontheextinguishmentofdebtof
$3,230,$47,288and$16,822,respectively.
In July 2003 (as subsequently updated in November
2003),theFASBreleasedEmergingIssuesTaskForce,or
EITF, Issue No. 03-10, “Application of Issue No. 02-16
byResellersto Sales Incentives Offered to Customersby
Manufacturers.” This EITF addresses whether a reseller
should account for consideration received from a vendor
that is a reimbursement by the vendor for honoring the
vendor’s salesincentivesoffereddirectlytoconsumers in
accordance with the guidance in EITF Issue No. 02-16.
For purposes of this Issue, the “vendor’s sales incentive
offered directly to consumers” is limited to a vendor’s
incentive(i)thatcanbetenderedbyaconsumeratresellers
thatacceptmanufacturer’sincentivesinpartial(orfull)of
thepricechargedbytheresellerforthevendor’sproduct,
(ii)forwhichtheresellerreceivesadirectreimbursement
fromthevendor(oraclearinghouseauthorizedbytheven-
dor) based on the face amount of the incentive, (iii) for
which the terms of reimbursement to the reseller for the
vendor’ssalesincentiveofferedtotheconsumermustnot
be influenced by or negotiated in conjunction with any
other incentivearrangementsbetweenthevendorandthe
resellerbut,rathermayonlybedeterminedbythetermsof
the incentive offered to consumers and (iv) whereby the
resellerissubjecttoanagencyrelationshipwith theven-
dor, whether expressed or implied, in the sales incentive
transaction between the vendor and the consumer. The
consensus is that sales incentives that meet all of such
criteria are not subject to the guidance in EITF Issue
No.02-16.Thereleaseiseffectiveforfiscalperiodsbegin-
ning after November 25, 2003. The Company adopted
thisreleaseduringthefirstquarteroffiscal2004withno
impactonitsfinancialpositionorresultsofoperations.
InMay2004,theFASBissuedFASBStaffPosition,or
FSP, 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement
andModernizationActof2003.”FSP106-2addressesthe
appropriate accounting and disclosure requirements for
companies that sponsor a postretirement health care plan
thatprovidesprescriptiondrugbenefits.Thenewguidance
was deemed necessary as a result of the 2003 Medicare
prescriptionlawwhichincludesafederalsubsidyforquali-
fying companies. The effective date of FSP 106-2 is the
first interim or annual period beginning after June 15,
2004. The Company completed a negative plan amend-
ment to eliminate outpatient prescription drug benefits
fromitspostretirementplaneffectiveinthesecondquarter
offiscal2004;therefore,theadoptionofFSP106-2hadno
impact on its financial position, results of operations or
relatedfootnotedisclosure.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“InventoryCosts.”ThenewstatementamendsAccounting
ResearchBulletinNo.43,Chapter4,“InventoryPricing,”
to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle
facilityexpense,freight,handlingcostsandwastedmate-
rial.Thisstatementrequiresthatthoseitemsberecognized
as current-period charges and requires that allocation of
fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be
based onthe normalcapacity oftheproductionfacilities.
Thisstatementiseffectiveforfiscalyearsbeginningafter
June15,2005.TheCompanydoesnotexpecttheadoption
ofthisstatementtohaveamaterialimpactonitsfinancial
conditionorresultsofoperations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised2004),“Share-BasedPayment,”orSFASNo.123R.
SFAS No. 123R replaces SFASNo.123, “Accountingfor
Stock-BasedCompensation”andsupersedesAPBOpinion
No.25,“AccountingforStockIssuedtoEmployees,”and
subsequently issued stock option-related guidance. This
statement establishes standards for the accounting for
transactionsinwhichanentityexchangesitsequityinstru-
ments for goods or services, primarily on accounting for
transactionsinwhichanentityobtainsemployeeservices
in share-based payment transactions. It also addresses
transactionsinwhichanentityincursliabilitiesinexchange
forgoodsorservicesthatarebasedonthefairvalueofthe
entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of those equity instruments. Entities will be
requiredtomeasurethecostofemployeeservicesreceived
in exchangeforanawardofequity instruments basedon