Advance Auto Parts 2004 Annual Report Download - page 29
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 29 of the 2004 Advance Auto Parts annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.AdvanceAutoParts,Inc.andSubsidiaries
27
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“InventoryCosts.”ThenewstatementamendsAccounting
ResearchBulletinNo.43,Chapter4,“InventoryPricing,”
to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle
facilityexpense,freight,handlingcostsandwastedmate-
rial.Thisstatementrequiresthatthoseitemsberecognized
as current-period charges and requires that allocation of
fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be
based onthe normalcapacity oftheproductionfacilities.
Thisstatementiseffectiveforfiscalyearsbeginningafter
June15,2005.Wedonotexpecttheadoptionofthisstate-
menttohaveamaterialimpactonourfinancialcondition
orresultsofoperations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised2004),“Share-BasedPayment,”orSFASNo.123R.
SFAS No. 123R replaces SFASNo.123, “Accountingfor
Stock-BasedCompensation”andsupersedesAPBOpinion
No.25,“AccountingforStockIssuedtoEmployees,”and
subsequently issued stock option related guidance. This
statement establishes standards for the accounting for
transactionsinwhichanentityexchangesitsequityinstru-
ments for goods or services, primarily on accounting for
transactionsinwhichanentityobtainsemployeeservices
in share-based payment transactions. It also addresses
transactionsinwhichanentityincursliabilitiesinexchange
forgoodsorservicesthatarebasedonthefairvalueofthe
entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of those equity instruments. Entities will be
requiredtomeasurethecostofemployeeservicesreceived
in exchangeforanawardofequity instruments basedon
thegrant-datefairvalueoftheaward(withlimitedexcep-
tions).Thatcostwillberecognizedovertheperiodduring
which an employee is required to provide service in
exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). The
grant-datefairvalueofemployeeshareoptionsandsimilar
instrumentswillbeestimatedusingoption-pricingmodels.
Ifanequityawardismodifiedafterthegrantdate,incre-
mentalcompensationcostwillberecognizedinanamount
equaltotheexcessofthefairvalueofthemodifiedaward
overthefairvalueoftheoriginalawardimmediatelybefore
themodification.
WearerequiredtoapplySFASNo.123Rtoallawards
granted,modifiedorsettledasofthebeginningofthefirst
interimorannualreportingperiodthatbeginsafterJune15,
2005. We are also required to use either the modified-
prospective method or modified-retrospective method.
Under the modified-prospective method, we must recog-
nizecompensationcostforallawardssubsequenttoadopt-
ingthestandardandfortheunvestedportionofpreviously
granted awards outstanding upon adoption. Under the
modified-retrospectivemethod,wemustrestateourprevi-
ouslyissuedfinancialstatementstorecognizetheamounts
wepreviouslycalculatedandreportedonaproformabasis,
as if the prior standard had been adopted. Under both
methods,wearepermittedtouseeitherthestraightlineor
anacceleratedmethodtoamortizethecostasanexpense
forawardswithgradedvesting.Thestandardpermitsand
encouragesearlyadoption.
WehavecommencedouranalysisoftheimpactofSFAS
No. 123R,buthave not yetdecided:(1) whether weelect
to early adopt, (2) if we elect to early adopt, what date
we would do so, (3) whether we will use the modified-
prospective or modified-retrospective method, and (4)
whetherwewillelecttousestraight-lineoranaccelerated
method.Accordingly,we havenotdeterminedtheimpact
thattheadoptionofSFASNo.123Rwillhaveonourfinan-
cialpositionorresultsofoperations.
QuantitativeandQualitativeDisclosuresAboutMarketRisks
We are exposed to cash f low risk due to changes in
interestrateswithrespecttoourlong-termdebt.Ourlong-
termdebtcurrentlyconsistsofborrowingsunderasenior
creditfacilityandisprimarilyvulnerabletomovementsin
theLIBORrate.Whilewecannotpredicttheimpactinter-
estratemovementswillhaveonourdebt,exposuretorate
changesismanagedthroughtheuseofhedgingactivities.
Ourfutureexposure tointerestrateriskincreasedduring
2004duetotheexpirationofour$150.0millionzero-cost
collarduringNovember2004.
In March2003,weenteredinto twointerestrateswap
agreements on an aggregate of $125 million of our debt
underourcreditfacility.Thefirstswapallowsustofixour
LIBOR rate at 2.269% on $75.0 million of variable rate
debtforatermof36months,expiringinthefirstquarter
of fiscal 2006. The second swap allows us to fix our
LIBOR rate at 1.79% on $50.0 million of variable rate
debtforatermof24months,expiringinthefirstquarter
offiscal2005.
SubsequenttoJanuary1,2005andinanefforttoman-
ageourfutureinterestraterisk,weenteredintothefollow-
ingthreenewinterestrateswapagreementsonanaggregate
of$175millionofdebtunderourseniorcreditfacility.The
detailfortheindividualswapsisasfollows:
• Thefirst swap, beginninginMarch 2005,allows us to
fixourtotalinterestrateat4.153%on$50millionofour
debtforatermof48months;
• Thesecondswap,beginninginMarch2005,allowsusto
fixourtotalinterestrateat4.255%on$75millionofour
debtforatermof60months;and
• Thethirdswap,beginninginMarch2006,allowsusto
fixourtotal interestrateat4.6125%on$50millionof
ourdebtforatermof54months.