BP 2010 Annual Report Download - page 31
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 31 of the 2010 BP annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.
Businessreview
Business review
Compliance and control risks
Regulatory – the oil industry in general, and in particular the US
industry following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, may face increased
regulation that could increase the cost of regulatory compliance
and limit our access to new exploration properties.
TheGulfofMexicooilspillislikelytoresultinmorestringentregulationof
oilandgasactivitiesintheUSandelsewhere,particularlyrelatingto
environmental,healthandsafetycontrolsandoversightofdrilling
operations,aswellasaccesstonewdrillingareas.Regulatoryorlegislative
actionmayimpacttheindustryasawholeandcouldbedirected
specicallytowardsBP.Forexample,intheUS,legislationiscurrently
beingconsideredthatmayimpactBP’sexistingcontractswiththeUS
GovernmentorlimititsabilitytoenterintonewcontractswiththeUS
Government.TheUSGovernmentimposedamoratoriumoncertain
offshoredrillingactivities,whichwassubsequentlyliftedinOctober2010;
however,theimplicationsofthemoratoriumforhowquicklytheindustry
willreturntodrillingremainsuncertain.Similaractionsmaybetakenby
governmentselsewhereintheworld.Newregulationsandlegislation,as
wellasevolvingpractices,couldincreasethecostofcomplianceandmay
requirechangestoourdrillingoperations,exploration,developmentand
decommissioningplans,andcouldimpactourabilitytocapitalizeonour
assetsandlimitouraccesstonewexplorationpropertiesoroperatorships,
particularlyinthedeepwaterGulfofMexico.Inaddition,increasesintaxes,
royaltiesandotheramountspayabletogovernmentsorgovernmental
agencies,orrestrictionsonavailabilityoftaxrelief,couldalsobeimposed
asaresponsetotheIncident.
Inaddition,theoilindustryissubjecttoregulationandintervention
bygovernmentsthroughouttheworldinsuchmattersastheawardof
explorationandproductioninterests,theimpositionofspecicdrilling
obligations,environmental,healthandsafetycontrols,controlsoverthe
developmentanddecommissioningofaeld(includingrestrictionson
production)and,possibly,nationalization,expropriation,cancellationor
non-renewalofcontractrights.Webuy,sellandtradeoilandgasproducts
incertainregulatedcommoditymarkets.Failuretorespondtochangesin
tradingregulationscouldresultinregulatoryactionanddamagetoour
reputation.Theoilindustryisalsosubjecttothepaymentofroyaltiesand
taxation,whichtendtobehighcomparedwiththosepayableinrespectof
othercommercialactivities,andoperatesincertaintaxjurisdictionsthat
haveadegreeofuncertaintyrelatingtotheinterpretationof,andchanges
to,taxlaw.Asaresultofnewlawsandregulationsorotherfactors,we
couldberequiredtocurtailorceasecertainoperations,orwecouldincur
additionalcosts.
Formoreinformationonenvironmentalregulation,seepages78-81.
Ethical misconduct and non-compliance – ethical misconduct or
breaches of applicable laws by our employees could be damaging
to our reputation and shareholder value.
Ourcodeofconduct,whichappliestoallemployees,denesour
commitmenttointegrity,compliancewithallapplicablelegalrequirements,
highethicalstandardsandthebehavioursandactionsweexpectofour
businessesandpeoplewhereverweoperate.Incidentsofethical
misconductornon-compliancewithapplicablelawsandregulations,
includingnon-compliancewithanti-bribery,anti-corruptionandother
applicablelawscouldbedamagingtoourreputationandshareholdervalue.
Multipleeventsofnon-compliancecouldcallintoquestiontheintegrityof
ouroperations.Forexample,inourtradingbusinesses,thereistheriskthat
adeterminedindividualcouldoperateasa‘roguetrader’,actingoutside
BP’sdelegations,controlsorcodeofconductinpursuitofpersonal
objectivesthatcouldbetothedetrimentofBPanditsshareholders.
Forcertainlegalproceedingsinvolvingthegroup,seeLegal
proceedingsonpages130-133.Forfurtherinformationontherisks
involvedinBP’stradingactivities,seeOperationalrisks–Treasuryand
tradingactivitiesonpage31.
Liabilities and provisions – BP’s potential liabilities resulting from
pending and future claims, lawsuits and enforcement actions
relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, together with the potential
cost and burdens of implementing remedies sought in the various
proceedings, cannot be fully estimated at this time but they have
had, and are expected to continue to have, a material adverse
impact on the group’s business.
UndertheOPA90BPExploration&ProductionInc.isoneoftheparties
nanciallyresponsiblefortheclean-upoftheGulfofMexicooilspillandfor
certaineconomicdamagesasprovidedforinOPA90,aswellasanynatural
resourcedamagesassociatedwiththespillandcertaincostsincurredby
federalandstatetrusteesengagedinajointassessmentofsuchnatural
resourcedamages.
BPandcertainofitssubsidiarieshavealsobeennamedas
defendantsinnumerouslawsuitsintheUSarisingoutoftheIncident,
includingactionsforpersonalinjuryandwrongfuldeath,purportedclass
actionsforcommercialoreconomicinjury,actionsforbreachofcontract,
violationsofstatutes,propertyandotherenvironmentaldamage,securities
lawclaimsandvariousotherclaims.SeeLegalproceedingsonpage130.
BPissubjecttoanumberofinvestigationsrelatedtotheIncident
bynumerousfederalandStateagencies.SeeLegalproceedingson
page130.Thetypesofenforcementactionpursuedandthenatureofthe
remediessoughtwilldependonthediscretionoftheprosecutorsand
regulatoryauthoritiesandtheirassessmentofBP’sculpabilityfollowing
theirinvestigations.Suchenforcementactionscouldincludecriminal
proceedingsagainstBPand/oremployeesofthegroup.Inadditiontones
andpenalties,suchenforcementactionscouldresultinthesuspensionof
operatinglicencesanddebarmentfromgovernmentcontracts.Debarment
ofBPExploration&ProductionInc.wouldpreventitfrombiddingonor
enteringintonewfederalcontractsorotherfederaltransactions,andfrom
obtainingnewordersorextensionstoexistingfederalcontracts,including
federalprocurementcontractsorleases.Dependentonthecircumstances,
debarmentorsuspensionmayalsobesoughtagainstafliatedentitiesof
BPExploration&ProductionInc.
AlthoughBPbelievesthatcostsarisingoutofthespillare
recoverablefromitspartnersandotherpartiesresponsibleunderOPA90,
suchrecoveryisnotcertainandBPhasrecognizedallofthecostsincurred
initsnancialstatements(seeFinancialstatements–Note2onpage158,
Note37onpage199andNote44onpage218,under‘Contingentassets
relatingtotheGulfofMexicooilspill’).
Anyndingofgrossnegligenceforpurposesofpenaltiessought
againstthegroupundertheCleanWaterActwouldalsohaveamaterial
adverseimpactonthegroup’sreputation,wouldaffectourabilitytorecover
costsrelatingtotheIncidentfromourpartnersandotherparties
responsibleunderOPA90andcouldaffectthenesandpenaltiespayable
bythegroupwithrespecttotheIncidentunderenforcementactions
outsidetheCleanWaterActcontext.
TheGulfofMexicooilspillhasdamagedBP’sreputation.This,
combinedwithotherrecenteventsintheUS(includingthe2005explosion
attheTexasCityreneryandthe2006pipelineleaksinAlaska),mayleadto
anincreaseinthenumberofcitationsand/orthelevelofnesimposedin
relationtotheGulfofMexicooilspillandanyfutureallegedbreachesof
safetyorenvironmentalregulations.
ClaimsbyindividualsandbusinessesunderOPA90areadjudicated
bytheGulfCoastClaimsFacility(GCCF)headedbyKennethFeinberg,who
wasjointlyappointedbyBPandtheUSAdministration.On18February
2011,theGCCFannounceditsnalrulesgoverningpaymentoptions,
eligibilityandsubstantiationcriteria,andnalpaymentmethodology.The
impactoftheserules,orothereventsrelatedtotheadjudicationofclaims,
onfuturepaymentsbytheGCCFisuncertain.Paymentscouldultimately
besignicantlyhigherorlowerthantheamountwehaveestimatedfor
individualandbusinessclaimsunderOPA90includedintheprovisionBP
recognizedforlitigationandclaims.(SeeFinancialstatements–Note37on
page199underLitigationandclaims.)
BPAnnualReportandForm20-F2010 29