Blackberry 2006 Annual Report Download - page 28

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 28 of the 2006 Blackberry annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 80

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80

Research In Motion Limited
26
Research In Motion Limited • Incorporated Under the Laws of Ontario (In thousands of United States dollars, except per share data, and except as otherwise indicated)
Amortization expense with respect to licenses (a component of Intangible assets) is charged to Cost of
sales and was $17.5 million in scal 2006 compared to $16.5 million in scal 2005.
Total amortization expense with respect to Intangible assets was $23.2 million in scal 2006 compared to
$19.7 million in scal 2005. See also notes 1(l) and 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates — Valuation of long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill”.

During scal 2005, the Company re-evaluated the estimated useful lives of certain of its information
technology assets and determined that the estimated useful lives should be reduced from ve years to
periods of three to four years. The impact of this change was applied on a prospective basis commencing
in the rst quarter of scal 2005. The impact of this change of accounting estimate resulted in incremental
amortization expense of $4.3 million for the year. Of this amount, $1.8 million was included in Cost of sales,
and $2.5 million was included in Amortization. See also note 1(k) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
During scal 2005, the Company also re-evaluated the estimated useful lives of capital assets used in
manufacturing, and research and development operations that resulted from the application of the 20%
declining balance amortization methodology. As a result of the plant capacity and capital asset utilizations
currently approaching 100% compared to much lower levels in prior scal years, the Company now
believes that the 20% declining balance method will not produce quarterly and annual depreciation
expense and resulting residual net book values that are consistent with the increased current and future
capital asset usage. The Company, therefore, revised its amortization method to a straight-line method and
determined estimated useful lives to be between ve and eight years for such capital assets, on a
prospective basis, effective the second quarter of scal 2005. The impact of this change of method of
accounting was insignicant for scal years 2006 and 2005. See also notes 2 and 6 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Litigation
As has been more fully disclosed in the Company’s annual consolidated nancial statements and notes
for the scal years ended March 4, 2006, February 26, 2005, February 28, 2004 and March 1, 2003, the
Company was the defendant in a patent litigation matter brought by NTP alleging that the Company
infringed on eight of NTP’s patents.
The matter went to trial in 2002 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
(“the District Court”), and the jury issued a verdict in favor of NTP. In 2003, the District Court ruled on
NTP’s request for an injunction with respect to RIM continuing to sell BlackBerry devices, software and
service in the United States. The District Court granted NTP the injunction requested; however, the
District Court then immediately granted RIM’s request to stay the injunction sought by NTP pending the
completion of RIM’s appeal. In December 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “CAFC”)
ruled on the appeal by the Company of the District Court’s judgment. In August 2005, the CAFC granted
RIM’s request to reconsider the December 2004 decision. The CAFC’s August 2005 decision vacated the
District Court’s judgment and the injunction, and remanded the case to the District Court for further
proceedings consistent with the CAFC’s ruling. Further court proceedings followed.