U-Haul 2005 Annual Report Download - page 25
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 25 of the 2005 U-Haul annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.24 I AMERCO ANNUAL REPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
assumptionsbemadetoestimatethevalueoftheentity
andajudgmentbemadeastowhetherornottheentity
has the financial strength to fund its own operations
and execute its business plan without the subordinated
financialsupportofanothercompany.
InFebruary,2004,SACHoldingCorporationrestructured
theindebtednessofthreesubsidiariesandthendistributed
its interest in those subsidiaries to its sole shareholder.
This triggered a requirement to reassess AMERCO’s
involvement with those subsidiaries, which led to the
conclusionthatbasedonthenexistingcurrentcontractual
and ownership interests between AMERCO and this
entity, AMERCO ceased to have a variable interest in
thosethreesubsidiariesatthatdate.
Separately, in March 2004, SAC Holding Corporation
restructured its indebtedness, triggering a similar
reassessmentofSACHoldingCorporationthatledtothe
conclusionthatSACHoldingCorporationwasnotaVIE
andthatAMERCOceasedtobetheprimarybeneficiaryof
SACHoldingCorporationanditsremainingsubsidiaries,
based onSAC HoldingCorporation’sability tofund its
ownoperationsandexecuteitsbusinessplanwithoutany
futuresubordinatedfinancialsupport.
Accordingly, at the dates AMERCO ceased to have a
variableinterestandceasedtobetheprimarybeneficiary,
itdeconsolidatedthoseentities.Thedeconsolidationwas
accounted for as a distribution of AMERCO’s interests
to the sole shareholder of the SAC entities. Because of
AMERCO’s continuing involvement with SAC Holding
Corporationanditscurrentandformersubsidiaries,the
distributionsdonotqualifyasdiscontinuedoperationsas
definedbySFASNo.144.
It is possible that SAC Holding Corporation could take
actions that would require us to re-determine whether
SAC Holding Corporation was a VIE or whether we
have become the primary beneficiary of SAC Holding
Corporation.Shouldthisoccur,wecouldberequiredto
re-consolidate someorallofSAC HoldingCorporation
withourfinancialstatements.
Similarly,SACHoldingIICorporationcouldtakeactions
thatwouldrequireustore-determinewhetheritisaVIE
or whether we continue to be the primary beneficiary
ofourvariableinterestin SAC HoldingIICorporation.
Should we cease to be the primary beneficiary, we
would be required to de-consolidate some or all of our
variableinterestinSACHoldingIICorporationfromour
financialstatements.
RecoverabilityofProperty,PlantandEquipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost.
Interest cost incurred during the initial construction of
buildings and rental equipment is considered part of
cost. Depreciation is computed for financial reporting
purposesprincipallyusingthestraight-linemethodover
the following estimated useful lives: rental equipment
2-20 years and buildings and non-rental equipment
3-55 years. Major overhauls to rental equipment are
capitalizedandareamortizedovertheestimatedperiod
benefited. Routine maintenance costs are charged to
operating expense as they are incurred. Gains and
losses on dispositions of property, plant and equipment
are netted against depreciation expense when realized.
Depreciation is recognized in amounts expected to
resultintherecoveryofestimatedresidualvaluesupon
disposal,i.e.,nogainsorlosses.Duringthefirstquarter
offiscal year 2005,the Companyloweredits estimates
forresidualvaluesonnewrentaltrucksandrentaltrucks
purchasedoffTRACleasesfrom25%oftheoriginalcost
to20%.Indeterminingthe depreciationrate,historical
disposal experience, holding periods and trends in the
marketforvehiclesarereviewed.
Weregularlyperformreviewstodeterminewhetherfacts
andcircumstancesexistwhichindicatethatthecarrying
amount of assets, including estimates of residual value,
maynotberecoverableorthattheusefullifeofassetsis
shorter or longer than originally estimated. Reductions
inresidualvalues(i.e.,thepriceatwhichweultimately
expecttodisposeofrevenueearningequipment)oruseful
lives will result in an increase in depreciation expense
over the life of the equipment. Reviews are performed
basedonvehicleclass,generallysubcategoriesoftrucks
and trailers. We assess the recoverability of the cost of
ourassetsbycomparingtheprojectedundiscountednet
cashflowsassociatedwiththerelatedassetorgroupof
assetsovertheirestimatedremaininglivesagainsttheir
respectivecarryingamounts.Weconsiderfactorssuchas
currentandexpectedfuturemarketpricetrendsonused
vehiclesandtheexpectedlifeofvehiclesincludedinthe
fleet. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the
carryingamountoverthefairvalueofthoseassets.Ifthe
remainingcostofassetsisdeterminedtoberecoverable,
buttheusefullivesareshorterorlongerthanoriginally
estimated,thenetbookvalueoftheassetsisdepreciated
overthenewlydeterminedremainingusefullives.
Duringthefourthquarteroffiscalyear2005,basedonan
economic market analysis, the Company decreased the
estimatedresidualvalueofcertainrentaltrucks.Theeffect
ofthechangedecreasedpre-taxincomeforfiscal2005
by$2.1million.Thein-houseanalysisofsalesoftrucks
comparedthetruckmodel,size,ageandaverageresidual
valueofunitssold.Basedontheanalysis,theestimated
residual values are decreased to approximately 20% of
historiccost.Theadjustmentreflectsmanagement’sbest
estimate,basedoninformationavailable,oftheestimated
residualvalueoftheserentaltrucks.