Dollar General 2009 Annual Report Download - page 91

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 91 of the 2009 Dollar General annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 131

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Income taxes (Continued)
A reconciliation between actual income taxes and amounts computed by applying the federal
statutory rate to income before income taxes is summarized as follows:
Successor Predecessor
March 6, 2007 February 3, 2007
through through
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 February 1, 2008 July 6, 2007
U.S. federal statutory rate on
earnings before income taxes $193,241 35.0% $68,041 35.0% $(2,308) 35.0% $ 1,399 35.0%
State income taxes, net of
federal income tax benefit . . 18,375 3.3 5,361 2.8 904 (13.7) (1,135) (28.4)
Jobs credits, net of federal
income taxes ............ (8,590) (1.6) (9,149) (4.7) (3,022) 45.8 (2,227) (55.7)
Increase (decrease) in valuation
allowances .............. (1,722) (0.3) 3,038 1.6 551 13.8
Income tax related interest
expense, net of federal
income tax benefit ........ 1,289 0.2 (2,015) (1.0) 2,738 (41.5) (172) (4.3)
Nondeductible Merger-related
lawsuit settlement ........ (366) (0.1) 18,130 9.3
Nondeductible transaction costs 13,501 337.9
Other, net ............... 10,447 2.0 2,815 1.4 (87) 1.3 76 1.9
$212,674 38.5% $86,221 44.4% $(1,775) 26.9% $11,993 300.2%
The 2009 effective tax rate is an expense of 38.5%. This expense is greater than the expected tax
rate of 35% due primarily to the inclusion of state income taxes in the total effective tax rate. The 2009
effective tax rate is less than the 2008 rate of 44.4% due principally to the unfavorable impact that the
non-deductible, merger related lawsuit settlement had on the 2008 rate. This reduction in the effective
tax rate was partially offset by a decrease in the tax rate benefit related to federal jobs credits. While
the total amount of jobs credits earned in 2009 was similar to the amount earned in 2008, the impact
of this benefit on the effective tax rate was reduced due to the 2009 increase in income before tax.
The 2008 effective income tax rate is an expense of 44.4%. This expense is greater than the
expected U.S. statutory tax rate of 35% principally due to the non-deductibility of the settlement and
related expenses associated with the Merger-related shareholder lawsuit.
The income tax rate for the Successor period ended February 1, 2008 is a benefit of 26.9%. This
benefit is less than the expected U.S. statutory rate of 35% due to the incurrence of state income taxes
in several of the group’s subsidiaries that file their state income tax returns on a separate entity basis
and the election to include, effective February 3, 2007, income tax related interest and penalties in the
amount reported as income tax expense.
The income tax rate for the Predecessor period ended July 6, 2007 is an expense of 300.2%. This
expense is higher than the expected U.S. statutory rate of 35% due principally to the non-deductibility
of certain acquisition expenses related to the Merger.
80