Salesforce.com 2016 Annual Report Download - page 62

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 62 of the 2016 Salesforce.com annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 138

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138

Other expense.
Fiscal Year Ended
January 31, Variance
Dollars(in thousands) 2016 2015
Other expense .................................. $(15,292) $(19,878) $4,586
Other expense primarily consists of non-operating costs such as strategic investments fair market
adjustments, foreign exchange rate fluctuations, real estate transactions and losses on derecognition of debt. The
decrease in other expense for fiscal 2016 was primarily due to losses totaling $ 10.3 million related to the
extinguishment of the 0.75% Senior Notes converted by noteholders in fiscal 2015.
Gain on sales of land and building improvements.
Fiscal Year Ended
January 31, Variance
Dollars(in thousands) 2016 2015
Gain on sales of land and building improvements ....... $21,792 $15,625 $6,167
Gain on sales of land and building improvements consists of the gain the company recognized from sales of
undeveloped real estate and a portion of associated perpetual parking rights in San Francisco, California. Gain on
sales of land and building improvements, net of closing costs, was $21.8 million for fiscal 2016 and was
$15.6 million during the same period a year ago.
Provision for income taxes.
Fiscal Year Ended
January 31, Variance
Dollars(in thousands) 2016 2015
Provision for income taxes ...................... $(111,705) $(49,603) $(62,102)
Effective tax rate ............................. 174% (23)%
We reported a tax provision of $111.7 million on a pretax income of $64.3 million, which resulted in an
effective tax rate of 174 percent for the fiscal 2016. We had a tax provision in profitable jurisdictions outside the
United States and current tax expense in the United States. We had U.S. current tax expense as a result of taxable
income before considering certain excess tax benefits from stock options and vesting of restricted stock.
We recorded a tax provision of $49.6 million with a pretax loss of $213.1 million, which resulted in an
negative effective tax rate of 23 percent for fiscal 2015. We had a tax provision primarily due to income taxes in
profitable jurisdictions outside the United States, which was partially offset by tax benefits from losses incurred
by ExactTarget in certain state jurisdictions.
We regularly assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance if it is
more-likely-than-not that some or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. We evaluate and weigh all
available positive and negative evidence such as historic results, future reversals of existing deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, as well as prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies. Generally,
more weight is given to objectively verifiable evidence, such as the cumulative loss in recent years. We had a
valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets as we considered our cumulative loss in recent years as a
significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome. We will adjust our valuation allowance in the
event sufficient positive evidence overcomes the negative evidence of losses in recent years. Due to our valuation
allowance, the effective tax rate could be volatile and is therefore difficult to forecast in future periods.
55