Neiman Marcus 2013 Annual Report Download - page 54

Table of Contents
The recoverability assessment with respect to each of our indefinite-lived intangible assets requires us to estimate the fair value of the asset as of the
assessment date. Such determination is made using discounted cash flow techniques. Significant inputs to the valuation model include:
• future revenue, cash flow and/or profitability projections;
• growth assumptions for future revenues as well as future gross margin rates, expense rates, capital expenditures and other estimates;
• estimated market royalty rates that could be derived from the licensing of our tradenames to third parties to establish the cash flows accruing to
the benefit of the Company as a result of our ownership of our tradenames; and
• rates, based on our estimated weighted average cost of capital, used to discount the estimated cash flow projections to their present value (or
estimated fair value).
If the recorded carrying value of the tradename exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded to write the tradename down to its
estimated fair value. We currently estimate that the fair value of our tradenames decreases by approximately $382 million for each 0.5% decrease in market
royalty rates and by approximately $96 million for each 0.25% increase in the weighted average cost of capital.
The assessment of the recoverability of the goodwill associated with our Neiman Marcus stores, Bergdorf Goodman stores, Last Call stores and
online reporting units involves a two-step process. The first step requires the comparison of the estimated enterprise fair value of each of our reporting units to
its recorded carrying value. We estimate the enterprise fair value based on discounted cash flow techniques. If the recorded carrying value of a reporting unit
exceeds its estimated enterprise fair value in the first step, a second step is performed in which we allocate the enterprise fair value to the fair value of the
reporting unit’s net assets. The second step of the impairment testing process requires, among other things, the estimation of the fair values of substantially all
of our tangible and intangible assets. Any enterprise fair value in excess of amounts allocated to such net assets represents the implied fair value of goodwill
for that reporting unit. If the recorded goodwill balance for a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded to
write goodwill down to its fair value. We currently estimate that a 5% decrease in the estimated fair value of the net assets of each of our reporting units as
compared to the values used in the preparation of these financial statements would decrease the excess of fair value over the carrying value by approximately
$326 million. In addition, we currently estimate that the fair value of our goodwill decreases by approximately $276 million for each 0.25% increase in the
discount rate used to estimate fair value.
The impairment testing process related to our indefinite-lived intangible assets is subject to inherent uncertainties and subjectivity. The use of
different assumptions, estimates or judgments with respect to the estimation of the projected future cash flows and the determination of the discount rate used
to reduce such projected future cash flows to their net present value could materially increase or decrease any related impairment charge. We believe our
estimates are appropriate based upon current market conditions and the best information available at the assessment date. However, future impairment
charges could be required if we do not achieve our current revenue and profitability projections or the weighted average cost of capital increases.
Leases. We lease certain retail stores and office facilities. Stores we own are often subject to ground leases. The terms of our real estate leases,
including renewal options, range from two to 130 years. Most leases provide for monthly fixed minimum rentals or contingent rentals based upon sales in
excess of stated amounts and normally require us to pay real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance costs and other occupancy costs. For leases
that contain predetermined, fixed calculations of minimum rentals, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We recognize
contingent rent expenses when it is probable that the sales thresholds will be reached during the year.
Benefit Plans. We sponsor a defined benefit Pension Plan, an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP Plan) which provides certain
employees additional pension benefits and a postretirement plan providing eligible employees limited postretirement health care benefits (Postretirement
Plan). In calculating our obligations and related expense, we make various assumptions and estimates, after consulting with outside actuaries and advisors.
The annual determination of expense involves calculating the estimated total benefits ultimately payable to plan participants. We use the traditional unit
credit method in recognizing pension liabilities. The Pension Plan, SERP Plan and Postretirement Plan are valued annually as of the end of each fiscal year.
As of the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, benefits offered to all employees under our Pension Plan and SERP Plan were frozen.
Significant assumptions related to the calculation of our obligations include the discount rates used to calculate the present value of benefit
obligations to be paid in the future, the expected long-term rate of return on assets held by our Pension
52