Seagate 2015 Annual Report Download - page 111

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 111 of the 2015 Seagate annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 155

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155

TableofContents
SEAGATETECHNOLOGYPLC
NOTESTOCONSOLIDATEDFINANCIALSTATEMENTS—(Continued)
unspecifiedpunitivedamages,includingforwillfulinfringement.OnJanuary16,2002,Convolvefiledanamendedcomplaint,allegingdefendantsinfringeUS
PatentNo.6,314,473(the"'473patent").Thedistrictcourtruledin2010thatthe'267patentwasoutofthecase.
OnAugust16,2011,thedistrictcourtgrantedinpartanddeniedinparttheCompany'smotionforsummaryjudgment.OnJuly1,2013,theU.S.Courtof
AppealsfortheFederalCircuit:1)affirmedthedistrictcourt'ssummaryjudgmentrulingsthatSeagatedidnotmisappropriateanyoftheallegedtradesecretsand
thattheassertedclaimsofthe'635patentareinvalid;2)reversedandvacatedthedistrictcourt'ssummaryjudgmentofnon-infringementwithrespecttothe'473
patent;and3)remandedthecaseforfurtherproceedingsonthe'473patent.OnJuly11,2014,thedistrictcourtgrantedtheCompany'ssummaryjudgmentmotion
regardingConvolve'sonlyremainingcauseofaction,whichallegedinfringementofthe'473patent.ThedistrictcourtenteredjudgmentinfavoroftheCompany
onJuly14,2014.ConvolvefiledanoticeofappealonAugust13,2014.OnFebruary10,2016,theU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheFederalCircuit:1)affirmedthe
districtcourt'ssummaryjudgmentofnodirectinfringementbySeagatebecauseSeagate'sATA/SCSIdiskdrivesdonotmeetthe"userinterface"limitationofthe
assertedclaimsofthe'473patent;2)affirmedthedistrictcourt'ssummaryjudgmentofnon-infringementbyCompaq'sproductsastoclaims1,3,and5ofthe'473
patentbecauseCompaq'sF10BIOSinterfacedoesnotmeetthe"commands"limitationofthoseclaims;3)vacatedthedistrictcourt'ssummaryjudgmentofnon-
infringementbyCompaq'saccusedproductsastoclaims7-15ofthe'473patent;4)reversedthedistrictcourt'ssummaryjudgmentofnon-infringementbasedon
interveningrights;and5)remandedthecasetothedistrictcourtforfurtherproceedingsonthe'473patent.Inviewoftherulingsmadebythedistrictcourtandthe
CourtofAppealsandtheuncertaintyregardingtheamountofdamages,ifany,thatcouldbeawardedConvolveinthismatter,theCompanydoesnotbelievethatit
iscurrentlypossibletodetermineareasonableestimateofthepossiblerangeoflossrelatedtothismatter.
AlexanderShukhv.SeagateTechnology—OnFebruary12,2010,AlexanderShukhfiledacomplaintagainsttheCompanyintheU.S.DistrictCourtforthe
DistrictofMinnesota,alleging,amongotherthings,employmentdiscriminationbasedonhisBelarusiannationaloriginandwrongfulfailuretonamehimasan
inventoronseveralpatentsandpatentapplications.Mr.Shukh'semploymentwasterminatedaspartofacompany-widereductioninforceinfiscalyear2009.He
seeksdamagesinexcessof$75million.OnMarch31,2014,thedistrictcourtgrantedSeagate'ssummaryjudgmentmotionandenteredjudgmentinfavorof
Seagate.Mr.ShukhfiledanoticeofappealonApril7,2014.OnOctober2,2015,thecourtofappealsvacatedandremandedthedistrictcourt'sgrantofsummary
judgmentonMr.Shukh'sclaimforcorrectionofinventorshipandaffirmedthedistrictcourt'sgrantofsummaryjudgmentastoallotherclaims.OnOctober29,
2015,Mr.Shukhfiledapetitionforrehearingenbancwiththecourtofappeals;thepetitionwasdeniedonDecember17,2015.OnMarch16,2016,Shukhfileda
petitionforwritofcertioraritotheU.S.SupremeCourt;thepetitionwasdeniedonJune27,2016.Inviewoftheuncertaintyregardingtheamountofdamages,if
any,thatcouldbeawardedinthismatter,theCompanydoesnotbelievethatitiscurrentlypossibletodetermineareasonableestimateofthepossiblerangeofloss
relatedtothismatter.
LEAPCo.,Ltd.v.SeagateSingaporeInternationalHeadquartersPte.Ltd.andNipponSeagateInc.—OnJuly4,2012,LEAPCo.,Ltd.filedalawsuitinthe
TokyoDistrictCourtofJapanagainstSeagateSingaporeInternationalHeadquartersPte.Ltd.,NipponSeagateInc.andBuffaloInc.allegingwrongfultermination
ofpurchaseagreementsandotherclaims,andseekingapproximately$38millionindamages.OnMarch16,2016,theCompanyandLEAPreachedasettlement.
Asaresultofthesettlement,thislitigationbetweentheCompanyandLEAPhasended.ThereisnodamageorlosstotheCompanyrelatedtothismatter.
108