Vonage 2008 Annual Report Download - page 16

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 16 of the 2008 Vonage annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 102

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102

r
esult, the vast majority o
f
the calls placed by a Vonage customer
are carried over the “last mile” by an incumbent phone company
,
and we indirectly pay access char
g
es to these competitors fo
r
each o
f
these calls. In contrast, traditional wireline providers do
n
ot pay us when their customers call our customers. Their “las
t
mil
e
connect
i
ons ena
bl
et
h
ese com
p
et
i
tors to
b
un
dl
e
ph
on
e
s
ervice with Internet access and television at prices we ma
yf
in
d
di
ff
icult to com
p
ete with
.
Th
e
i
ncum
b
ent
ph
one com
p
an
i
es, as we
ll
as t
h
eca
bl
e
companies, have lon
g
-standin
g
relationships with re
g
ulators,
legislators, lobbyists and the media. This can be an advantage
f
o
r
th
em
b
ecause
l
e
gi
s
l
at
i
ve, re
g
u
l
atory or
j
u
di
c
i
a
ld
eve
l
opments
in
our rapidly evolvin
g
industry could have a ne
g
ative impact on us
.
Cable com
p
anies
These com
p
etitors include com
p
anies such as
C
ablevision
,
C
omcast Corporation, Cox Communications and Time Warne
r
C
able
(
a division of Time Warner Inc.
)
. Cable com
p
anies hav
e
s
i
g
nificant financial resources and have made and are continuin
g
t
o make substantial investments in deliverin
g
broadband Interne
t
access and phone service to their customers. Providing Internet
access and cable television to many of our existin
g
and potentia
l
customers allows them to en
g
a
g
einhi
g
hly tar
g
eted, low-cost
direct marketing and may enhance their image as trusted pro
-
v
i
de
r
so
f
se
rvi
ces.
C
able companies are also a
gg
ressively usin
g
their existin
g
customer relationships to bundle services. For example, they
b
un
dl
e
I
nternet access, ca
bl
ete
l
ev
i
s
i
on an
dph
one serv
i
ce w
i
t
h
a
n
i
mplied price
f
or the phone service that may be si
g
ni
f
icantly below
ours. They are able to advertise on their local access channel
s
with no si
g
nificant out-of-pocket cost and throu
g
h mailin
g
s in bill
s
w
i
t
hli
tt
l
e mar
gi
na
l
cost.
Th
ey a
l
so rece
i
ve a
d
vert
i
s
i
n
g
t
i
me as par
t
o
f
their relationships with television networks, and the
y
are able t
o
u
se this time to promote their telephone service offerings
.
M
an
y
ca
bl
e compan
i
es sen
d
tec
h
n
i
c
i
ans to customers
prem-
i
ses to initiate service. Although this is expensive, it also can b
e
m
ore attract
i
ve to customers t
h
an
i
nsta
lli
ng t
h
e
i
r own router.
I
n
addition, these technicians ma
y
install an independent source o
f
p
ower, which can give customers assurance that their phon
e
s
erv
i
ce w
ill
not
b
e
i
nterrupte
dd
ur
i
ng power outages.
C
able companies’ ownership of Internet connections to our
customers could enable them to detect and inter
f
ere with th
e
completion of our customers’ calls. While we are not aware of an
y
occurrence,
i
t
i
s unc
l
ear w
h
et
h
er current re
g
u
l
at
i
ons wou
ld
per-
m
it these companies to degrade the quality o
f
, give low priority t
o
or block entirely the information packets and other data w
e
t
ransm
i
t over t
h
e
i
r
li
nes.
I
na
ddi
t
i
on, t
h
ese compan
i
es ma
y
attempt to char
g
e their customers more
f
or usin
g
our services
.
This could also apply to phone companies that connect our cus
-
to
m
e
r
s
t
o
t
he I
nt
e
rn
e
t.
W
e believe our abilit
y
to success
f
ull
y
compete with cable
companies is enhanced by the
f
eatures we o
ff
er that cabl
e
com
p
anies do not offer
(
such as
p
ortable service and wide choic
e
of area codes) and because our national presence makes us more
attractive to national retail outlets and allows us to more e
ff
icientl
y
p
urc
h
ase nat
i
ona
l
a
d
vert
i
s
i
n
g
.
W
ireless tele
p
hone com
p
anie
s
We also compete with wireless phone companies, such a
s
AT&T,
Sp
rint, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless.
S
ome consumer
s
use wireless phones, instead of VoIP phones, as a replacemen
t
f
or a wireline phone. Also, wireless phone companies increasingl
y
a
re prov
idi
ng w
i
re
l
ess
b
roa
db
an
dI
nternet access to t
h
e
ir
c
ustomers and ma
y
in the future offer VoIP to their customers. As
w
ireless providers o
ff
er more minutes at lower prices and com
-
p
an
i
on
l
an
dli
ne a
l
ternat
i
ve serv
i
ces, t
h
e
i
r serv
i
ces
h
ave
b
ecom
e
more attractive to households as a competin
g
replacement for
w
ireline service. Wireless telephone companies have a strong
retail presence and have significant financial resources.
Al
ternat
i
ve vo
i
ce commun
i
cat
i
on prov
id
er
s
W
ea
l
so compete a
g
a
i
nst esta
bli
s
h
e
d
a
l
ternat
i
ve vo
i
c
e
c
ommunication providers, such as Sk
y
pe (a service of eBa
y
Inc.)
,
magicJack and independent VoIP service providers. Some of
these service
p
roviders have chosen to sacrifice revenue in orde
r
to
g
ain market share and have o
ff
ered their services at lowe
r
p
rices or for free. Google Inc., Microsoft Corporation and Yahoo!
Inc. also offer free instant messa
g
in
g
services that are voice
e
n
abled.
While not all of these competitors currently offer the ability t
o
c
all or be called by anyone not usin
g
their service, in the
f
utur
e
they may integrate such capabilities into their service o
ff
erings.
In addition, a continuin
g
trend toward consolidation o
f
tele
-
c
ommunications companies and the
f
ormation o
f
strategic alli
-
a
nces w
i
t
hi
nt
h
ete
l
ecommun
i
cat
i
ons
i
n
d
ustry, as we
ll
as t
he
d
evelopment of new technolo
g
ies, could
g
ive rise to si
g
nificant
new competition.
EMPLOYEES
As o
f
December 31, 2008, we had 1,491 employees. None o
f
o
ur emp
l
oyees
i
ssu
bj
ect to a co
ll
ect
i
ve
b
ar
g
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
g
reement.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
W
e were
i
ncorporate
di
n
D
e
l
aware
i
n
M
ay 2000 an
d
c
h
an
g
e
d
o
ur name to Vona
g
e Holdin
g
s Corp in February 2001. We main-
tain a website with the addres
s
www.v
onage
.
com
. The
i
nformation contained on our website is not included as a
p
art of,
o
r incorporated b
y
re
f
erence into, this Annual Report on For
m
1
0-K. Other than an investor’s own Internet access charges, we
make available free of char
g
e throu
g
h our website our Annua
l
Report on Form 10-K, Quarterl
y
Reports on Form 10-Q and Cur-
rent Re
p
orts on Form 8-K, and amendments to these re
p
orts, a
s
soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically file
d
such material with, or furnished such material to, the Securities
a
nd Exchange Commission
.
8
VO
NA
G
E ANN
U
AL REP
O
RT 2008