Seagate 2002 Annual Report Download - page 98

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 98 of the 2002 Seagate annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 124

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(CONTINUED)
Trade names —The value of the trade names was based upon discounting to their net present value the licensing income that would arise
by charging the operating businesses that use the trade names.
Developed technologies The value of this asset for each operating business was determined by discounting the expected future cash
flows attributable to all existing technologies which had reached technological feasibility, after considering risks relating to: (1) the
characteristics and applications of the technology, (2) existing and future markets, and (3) life cycles of the technologies. Estimates of future
revenues and expenses used to determine the value of developed technology were consistent with the historical trends in the industry and
expected outlooks.
Assembled workforces —The value of the assembled work force was determined by estimating the recruiting, hiring and training costs to
replace each group of existing employees.
In-process research and development —The value of in-process research and development was based on an evaluation of all
developmental projects using the guidance set forth in FIN 4 and SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to Be Sold,
Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.” The amount was determined by: (1) obtaining management estimates of future revenues and operating profits
associated with existing developmental projects, (2) projecting the cash flows and costs to completion of the underlying technologies and
resultant products, and (3) discounting these cash flows to their net present value.
Estimates of future revenues and expenses used to determine the value of in-process research and development were consistent with the
historical trends in the industry and expected outlooks. The entire amount was charged to operations because related technologies had not
reached technological feasibility, and they had no alternative future use.
9. Equity
Share Capital
The Company’s authorized share capital is $13,500 and consists of 1,250,000,000 common shares, par value $0.00001, of which
438,870,267 shares were outstanding as of June 27, 2003 and 100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.00001, of which none were issued or
outstanding as of June 27, 2003.
Common shares —Holders of common shares are entitled to receive dividends and distributions when and as declared by the Company’s
Board of Directors. Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, after required payments are made to holders of preferred
shares, any remaining assets of the Company will be distributed ratably to holders of the preferred and common shares. Holders of common
shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters upon which the common shares are entitled to vote, including the election of directors.
Preferred shares —The Company is authorized to issue up to a total of 100 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series,
without stockholder approval. The Board of Directors is authorized to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each
series, and to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any of its qualifications, limitations or
restrictions. The Board of Directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of a series, but not below the number of shares of that
series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by the stockholders.
The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could harm the voting power
or other rights of the holders of the common stock. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of
the Company and might harm the market price of its common stock and the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock. As of June
27, 2003, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
In connection with the Company’s initial public offering in December 2002, all previously outstanding shares of preferred stock
aggregating 400 million shares were converted by New SAC into the Company
s common stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or
winding up of the Company, the holders of the previously outstanding preferred shares were entitled to receive, out of any remaining legally
available assets of the Company, a liquidation preference of $2.30 per share, less the aggregate amount of any distributions or dividends
already made per preferred share. After the payment in full of the liquidation preference the holders of preferred shares were entitled to share,
ratably with the holders of common shares, in any remaining assets available for distribution. To the extent there were not sufficient remaining
assets of the Company to pay the liquidation preference, holders of preferred shares would share ratably in the distribution of the Company’s
remaining assets. Upon payment of the liquidation preference and any other amounts payable on liquidation, dissolution or winding up, on each
preferred share, the preferred shares would be cancelled. During fiscal year 2002, holders of the preferred shares received approximately $199
million, or $0.50 per share, in distributions, which had the effect of reducing the liquidation preference to approximately $1.80 per share.
91