Snapple 2011 Annual Report Download - page 48

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 48 of the 2011 Snapple annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 140

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140

28
Net Sales
Net sales increased $267 million, or approximately 5%, for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with the year ended
December 31, 2010. The increase was attributable to price increases, $61 million as a result of a higher net sales value per case
driven by the repatriation of certain brands under the licensing arrangements with PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, $27 million of
incremental revenue recognized under the PepsiCo and Coca-Cola license arrangements and increased volume in our contract
manufacturing.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $25 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with the year ended December 31, 2010.
Gross margin of 57.9% for the year ended December 31, 2011, was lower than the 60.2% gross margin for the year ended December
31, 2010, primarily due to higher costs for packaging materials, sweeteners, apple juice concentrate and other commodities. The
cost of inflation also contributed to a $12 million LIFO inventory provision recorded in the current year compared to a $2 million
inventory provision in the prior year. In addition to the effect of this cost inflation, we recorded $22 million of unrealized losses
during the year ended December 31, 2011 for the mark-to-market activity on commodity derivative contracts versus $1 million
of unrealized gains in the prior year. These reductions in our gross margin were partially offset by increases in our product prices
and ongoing productivity savings.
The change in the gross margin was also impacted by the favorable comparison of $19 million of expenses associated with
labor, co-packing, unfavorable yield, and an underabsorption of manufacturing overhead as a result of the strike at our Williamson,
New York manufacturing facility in the prior year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations decreased $1 million to $1,024 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with the
year ago period. The decrease was primarily attributable to increased selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses and
other operating expense (income), net, partially offset by the $25 million increase in gross profit discussed above. SG&A expenses
increased by $24 million primarily due to higher transportation costs principally due to rising fuel prices partially offset by RCI-
related and other productivity savings, an $18 million legal provision associated with litigation against The American Bottling
Company and incremental costs associated with the repatriation of brands. Favorable items affecting the comparison include the
transaction costs associated with the PepsiCo and Coca-Cola licensing agreements that did not recur, the reclassification of certain
transportation allowances to our customers from SG&A expenses to net sales and a reduction in our information technology ("IT")
investments.
Interest Expense and Other Income, net
Interest expense decreased $14 million compared with the year ago period, reflecting lower interest rates on our outstanding
debt obligations during 2010 and the repayment of our revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") in February 2010.
Other income, net of $12 million and $21 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was related
primarily to indemnity income associated with the Tax Sharing and Indemnification Agreement ("Tax Indemnity Agreement")
with Kraft. For the year ended December 31, 2010, indemnity income of $19 million included $10 million of benefits not expected
to recur driven by our separation related tax losses and the impact of a Canadian audit in 2010.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In December 2010, the Company completed a tender offer on a portion of the 2018 Notes and retired, at a premium, an
aggregate principal amount of approximately $476 million. The loss on early extinguishment of debt included the $96 million
premium for the tender offer, a $3 million write-off of a portion of the debt issuance costs and unamortized discount associated
with the 2018 Notes and $1 million of associated reacquisition costs. There was no loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2011.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were 34.6% and 35.8%, respectively. The decrease
in the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011, was primarily driven by certain state and federal income tax benefits,
principally the domestic manufacturing deduction, related to the PepsiCo and Coca-Cola licensing agreements executed in 2010.
The impact of these benefits decreased the provision for income taxes and the effective tax rate by $19 million and 2.1%, respectively.
These benefits will not recur beyond 2011. The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2010, also included
a $14 million benefit due to a favorable change of Mexican tax law.