Allegheny Power 2015 Annual Report Download - page 142
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 142 of the 2015 Allegheny Power annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.
126
CollateralProvisions
FES
AESupply
Utilities
Total
(Inmillions)
SplitRating(Oneratingagency'sratingbelowinvestmentgrade)
$
198
$
6
$
41
$
245
BB+/Ba1CreditRatings
$
231
$
6
$
41
$
278
Fullimpactofcreditcontingentcontractualobligations
$
363
$
16
$
41
$
420
Excluded from the preceding chart are the potential collateral obligations due to affiliate transactions between the Regulated
DistributionsegmentandCESsegment.AsofDecember31,2015,neitherFESnorAESupplyhadanycollateralpostedwiththeir
affiliates.IntheeventofaseniorunsecuredcreditratingdowngradetobelowS&P'sBBorMoody'sBa3,FESwouldberequiredto
post$8millionwithaffiliatedparties.
OTHERCOMMITMENTSANDCONTINGENCIES
FirstEnergyisaguarantorunderasyndicatedseniorsecuredtermloanfacilitydueMarch3,2020,underwhichGlobalHolding
borrowed$300million.InadditiontoFirstEnergy,SignalPeak,GlobalRail,GlobalMiningGroup,LLCandGlobalCoalSalesGroup,
LLC,eachbeingadirector indirectsubsidiaryofGlobalHolding,havealsoprovidedtheirjointandseveralguarantiesof the
obligationsofGlobalHoldingunderthefacility.
InconnectionwithGlobalHolding'stermloanfacility,aportionofGlobalHolding'sdirectandindirectmembershipinterestsinSignal
Peak,GlobalRailandtheiraffiliatesalongwitheachofFEV'sandWMBMarketingVentures,LLC's331/3%membershipinterestsin
GlobalHolding,arepledgedtothelendersunderGlobalHolding'sfacilityascollateral.FailurebyGlobalHoldingtomeettheterms
andconditionsunderitstermloanfacilitycouldrequireFirstEnergytobeobligatedundertheprovisionsofitsguarantee,resultingin
consolidationofGlobalHoldingbyFE.
Duringthefirstquarterof2015,asubsidiaryofGlobalHoldingeliminateditsrighttoput2milliontonsannuallythrough2024fromthe
SignalPeakminetoFGinexchangeforFirstEnergyextendingitsguaranteeunderGlobalHolding's$300millionseniorsecuredterm
loanfacilitythrough2020,resultinginapretaxchargeof$24million.SeeNote8,VariableInterestEntities,andNote1,Organization,
BasisofPresentationandSignificantAccountingPoliciesInvestments,foradditionalinformationregardingFEV'sinvestmentin
GlobalHolding.
ENVIRONMENTALMATTERS
Variousfederal,stateandlocalauthoritiesregulateFirstEnergywithregardtoairandwaterqualityandotherenvironmentalmatters.
CompliancewithenvironmentalregulationscouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectonFirstEnergy'searningsandcompetitivepositionto
theextentthatFirstEnergycompeteswithcompaniesthatarenotsubjecttosuchregulationsand,therefore,donotbeartheriskof
costsassociatedwithcompliance,orfailuretocomply,withsuchregulations.
CleanAirAct
FirstEnergycomplieswithSO2andNOxemissionreductionrequirementsundertheCAAandSIP(s)byburninglowersulfurfuel,
utilizingcombustioncontrolsandpostcombustioncontrols,generatingmoreelectricityfromlowerornonemittingplantsand/orusing
emissionallowances.
CSAPRrequiresreductionsofNOxandSO2emissionsintwophases(2015and2017),ultimatelycappingSO2emissionsinaffected
statesto2.4milliontonsannuallyandNOxemissionsto1.2milliontonsannually.CSAPRallowstradingofNOxandSO2emission
allowancesbetweenpowerplantslocatedinthesamestateandinterstatetradingofNOxandSO2emissionallowanceswithsome
restrictions.TheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.CircuitorderedtheEPAonJuly28,2015,toreconsidertheCSAPRcapsonNOx
andSO2emissionsfrompowerplantsin13states,includingOhio,PennsylvaniaandWestVirginia.Thisfollowsthe2014U.S.
SupremeCourtrulinggenerallyupholdingEPA’sregulatoryapproachunderCSAPR,butquestioningwhetherEPArequiredupwind
statestoreduceemissionsbymorethantheircontributiontoairpollutionindownwindstates.EPAproposedaCSAPRupdateruleon
November16,2015,thatwouldreducesummertimeNOxemissionsfrompowerplantsin23statesintheeasternU.S.,including
Ohio,PennsylvaniaandWestVirginia,beginningin2017.DependingonhowtheEPAandthestatesimplementCSAPR,thefuture
costofcompliancemaybesubstantialandchangestoFirstEnergy'sandFES'operationsmayresult.
EPAtightenedtheprimaryandsecondaryNAAQSforozonefromthe2008standardlevelsof75PPBto70PPBonOctober1,2015.
EPAstatedthevastmajorityofU.S.countieswillmeetthenew70PPBstandardby2025duetootherfederalandstaterulesand
programsbutEPAwilldesignatethosecountiesthatfailtoattainthenew2015ozoneNAAQSbyOctober1,2017.Stateswillthen
haveroughlythreeyearstodevelopimplementationplanstoattainthenew2015ozoneNAAQS.DependingonhowtheEPAandthe
statesimplementthenew2015ozoneNAAQS,thefuturecostofcompliancemaybesubstantialandchangestoFirstEnergy’sand
FES’operationsmayresult.
MATSimposesemissionlimitsformercury,PM,andHClforallexistingandnewfossilfuelfiredelectricgeneratingunitseffectivein
April2015withaveragingofemissionsfrommultipleunitslocatedatasingleplant.UndertheCAA,statepermittingauthoritiescan
127
grantanadditionalcomplianceyearthroughApril2016,asneeded,includinginstanceswhennecessarytomaintainreliabilitywhere
electricgeneratingunitsarebeingclosed.OnDecember28,2012,theWVDEPgrantedaconditionalextensionthroughApril16,
2016forMATScomplianceattheFortMartin,HarrisonandPleasantsplants.OnMarch20,2013,thePADEPgrantedanextension
throughApril16,2016forMATScomplianceattheHatfield'sFerryandBruceMansfieldplants.OnFebruary5,2015,theOEPA
grantedanextensionthroughApril16,2016forMATScomplianceattheBayShoreandSammisplants.Nearlyallspendingfor
MATScomplianceatBayShoreandSammishasbeencompletedthrough2014.Inaddition,anEPAenforcementpolicydocument
contemplatesuptoanadditionalyeartoachievecompliance,throughApril2017,undercertaincircumstancesforreliabilitycritical
units.OnJune29,2015,theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtreversedaU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.Circuitdecisionthatupheld
MATS,rejectingEPA’sregulatoryapproachthatcostsarenotrelevanttothedecisionofwhetherornottoregulatepowerplant
emissionsunderSection112oftheCleanAirActandremandedthecasebacktotheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.Circuitfor
furtherproceedings.TheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.CircuitlaterremandedMATSbacktoEPA,whorepresentedtosuchcourt
thattheEPAisontracktoissueafinalizedMATSbyApril15,2016.Subjecttotheoutcomeofanyfurtherproceedingsbeforethe
U.S. Court ofAppeals for the D.C. Circuit and how the MATS are ultimately implemented, FirstEnergy's total capital cost for
compliance(overthe2012to2018timeperiod)iscurrentlyexpectedtobeapproximately$345million(CESsegmentof$168million
andRegulatedDistributionsegmentof$177million),ofwhich$202millionhasbeenspentthroughDecember31,2015($80million
atCESand$122millionatRegulatedDistribution).
AsaresultofMATS,EastlakeUnits13,AshtabulaUnit5andLakeShoreUnit18weredeactivatedinApril2015,whichcompletes
thedeactivationof5,429MWofcoalfiredplantssince2012.
OnAugust3,2015,FG,asubsidiaryofFES,submittedtotheAAAofficeinNewYork,N.Y.,ademandforarbitrationandstatementof
claimagainstBNSFandCSXseekingadeclarationthatMATSconstitutedaforcemajeurethatexcusesFG’sperformanceunderits
coaltransportationcontractwiththeseparties.Specifically,thedisputearisesfromacontractforthetransportationbyBNSFandCSX
ofaminimumof3.5milliontonsofcoalannuallythrough2025tocertaincoalfiredpowerplantsownedbyFGthatarelocatedin
Ohio.AsaresultofandincompliancewithMATS,thoseplantsweredeactivatedbyApril16,2015.InJanuary2012,FGnotified
BNSFandCSXthatMATSconstitutedaforcemajeureeventunderthecontractthatexcusedFG’sfurtherperformance.Separately,
onAugust4,2015,BNSFandCSXsubmittedtotheAAAofficeinWashington,D.C.,ademandforarbitrationandstatementofclaim
againstFGallegingthatFGbreachedthecontractandthatFG’sdeclarationofaforcemajeureunderthecontractisnotvalidand
seekingdamagesincluding,butnotlimitedto,lostprofitsunderthecontractthrough2025.Aspartofitsstatementofclaim,arightto
liquidateddamagesisalleged.Thearbitrationpanelhasdeterminedtoconsolidatetheclaimswithaliabilityhearingexpectedto
begininNovember2016,and,ifnecessary,adamageshearingisexpectedtobegininMay2017.Thedecisiononliabilityis
expectedtobeissuedwithinsixtydaysfromtheendoftheliabilityhearings.FirstEnergyandFEScontinuetobelievethatMATS
constitutesaforcemajeureeventunderthecontractasitrelatestothedeactivatedplantsandthatFG’sperformanceunderthe
contractisthereforeexcused.FirstEnergyandFES intendtovigorouslyasserttheirpositioninthearbitrationproceedings.If,
however,thearbitrationpanelrulesinfavorofBNSFandCSX,theresultsofoperationsandfinancialconditionofbothFirstEnergy
andFEScouldbemateriallyadverselyimpacted.FirstEnergyandFESareunabletoestimatethelossorrangeofloss.
FGisalsoapartytoanothercoaltransportationcontractcoveringthedeliveryof2.5milliontonsannuallythrough2025,aportionof
whichistobedeliveredtoanothercoalfiredplantownedbyFGthatwasdeactivatedasaresultofMATS.FGhasasserteda
defenseofforcemajeureinresponsetodeliveryshortfallstosuchplantunderthiscontractaswell.IfFirstEnergyandFESfailto
reacharesolutionwiththeapplicablecounterpartiestothecontract,andifitwereultimatelydeterminedthat,contrarytoFirstEnergy’s
andFES’belief,theforcemajeureprovisionsofthatcontractdonotexcusethedeliveryshortfallstothedeactivatedplant,theresults
ofoperationsandfinancialconditionofbothFirstEnergyandFEScouldbemateriallyadverselyimpacted.FirstEnergyandFESare
unabletoestimatethelossorrangeofloss.
Astobothcoaltransportationagreementsreferencedabove,FESpaidinsettlementapproximately$70millioninliquidateddamages
fordeliveryshortfallsin2014relatedtoitsdeactivatedplants.
Astoaspecificcoalsupplyagreement,FirstEnergyandAESupplyhaveassertedterminationrightseffectivein2015.Inresponseto
notificationofthetermination,thecoalsuppliercommencedlitigationallegingFirstEnergyandAESupplydonothavesufficient
justification to terminate the agreement. FirstEnergy andAE Supply have filed an answer denying any liability related to the
termination.Thismatteriscurrentlyinthediscoveryphaseoflitigationandnotrialdatehasbeenestablished.Thereare6milliontons
remainingunderthecontractfordelivery.Atthistime,FirstEnergycannotestimatethelossorrangeoflossregardingtheongoing
litigationwithrespecttothisagreement.
InSeptember2007,AEreceivedanNOVfromtheEPAallegingNSRandPSDviolationsundertheCAA,aswellasPennsylvania
andWestVirginiastatelawsatthecoalfiredHatfield'sFerryandArmstrongplantsinPennsylvaniaandthecoalfiredFortMartinand
WillowIslandplantsinWestVirginia.TheEPA'sNOVallegesequipmentreplacementsduringmaintenanceoutagestriggeredthepre
constructionpermittingrequirementsundertheNSRandPSDprograms.OnJune29,2012,January31,2013,andMarch27,2013,
EPA issued CAA section 114 requests for the Harrison coalfired plant seeking information and documentation relevant to its
operationandmaintenance,includingcapitalprojectsundertakensince2007.OnDecember12,2014,EPAissuedaCAAsection114
requestfor theFortMartincoalfiredplant seekinginformation anddocumentationrelevantto itsoperation andmaintenance,
includingcapitalprojectsundertakensince2009.FirstEnergyintendstocomplywiththeCAAbut,atthistime,isunabletopredictthe
outcomeofthismatterorestimatethelossorrangeofloss.