Allegheny Power 2015 Annual Report Download - page 137



120
reconcilableEE&Criders.OnJune19,2015,thePPUCissuedaPhaseIIIFinalImplementationOrdersetting:demandreduction
targets,relativetoeachPennsylvaniaCompanies'20072008peakdemand(inMW),at1.8%forME,1.7%forPenn,1.8%forWP,
and0%forPNandenergyconsumptionreductiontargets,asapercentageofeachPennsylvaniaCompanies’historic2010forecasts
(inMWH),at4.0%forME,3.9%forPN,3.3%forPenn,and2.6%forWP.ThePennsylvaniaCompaniesfiledtheirPhaseIIIEE&C
plansfortheJune2016throughMay2021periodonNovember23,2015,whicharedesignedtoachievethetargetsestablishedin
thePPUC'sPhaseIIIFinalImplementationOrder.EDCsarepermittedtorecovercostsforimplementingtheirEE&Cplans.On
February10, 2016,the PennsylvaniaCompaniesandthepartiesintervening inthe PPUC'sPhaseIII proceedingfiledajoint
settlementthatresolvesallissuesintheproceedingandissubjecttoPPUCapproval.

PursuanttoAct11of2012,PennsylvaniaEDCsmayestablishaDSICtorecovercostsofinfrastructureimprovementsandcosts
relatedtohighwayrelocationprojectswithPPUCapproval.PennsylvaniaEDCsmustfileLTIIPsoutlininginfrastructureimprovement
plansforPPUCreviewandapprovalpriortoapprovalofaDSIC.OnOctober19,2015,eachofthePennsylvaniaCompaniesfiled
LTIIPswiththePPUCforinfrastructureimprovementoverthefiveyearperiodof2016to2020forthefollowingcosts:WP$88.34
millionPN$56.74millionPenn$56.35millionandME$43.44million.Theseamountsincludeallqualifyingdistributioncapital
additionsidentifiedintherevisedimplementationplanfortherecentfocusedmanagementandoperationsauditofthePennsylvania
Companiesasdiscussedbelow.OnFebruary11,2016,thePPUCapprovedthePennsylvaniaCompanies'LTIIPs.OnFebruary16,
2016,thePennsylvaniaCompaniesfiledDSICridersforPPUCapprovalforquarterlycostrecoveryassociatedwiththecapital
projectsapprovedintheLTIIPs.TheDSICridersareexpectedtobeeffectiveJuly1,2016.

EachofthePennsylvaniaCompaniescurrentlyofferdistributionratesundertheirrespectiveJointPetitionsforSettlementapproved
onApril9,2015bythePPUC,which,amongotherthings,providedforatotalincreaseinannualrevenuesforallPennsylvania
Companiesof$292.8million,($89.3millionforME,$90.8millionforPN,$15.9millionforPennand$96.8millionforWP),including
the recovery of $87.7 million of additional annual operating expenses, including costs associated with service reliability
enhancementstothedistributionsystem,amortizationofdeferredstormcostsandtheremainingnetbookvalueoflegacymeters,
assistanceforprovidingservicetolowincomecustomers,andthecreationofastormreserveforeachutility.Additionally,the
approvedsettlementsincludecommitmentstomeetcertainwaittimesforcallcentersandservicereliabilitystandards.Thenewrates
wereeffectiveMay3,2015.

OnJuly16,2013,thePPUC'sBureauofAuditsinitiatedafocusedmanagementandoperationsauditofthePennsylvaniaCompanies
asrequiredeveryeightyearsbystatute.ThePPUCissuedareportonitsfindingsandrecommendationsonFebruary12,2015,at
whichtimethePennsylvaniaCompanies'associatedimplementationplanwasalsomadepublic.InanorderissuedonMarch30,
2015,thePennsylvaniaCompaniesweredirectedtodevelopandfilebyMay29,2015arevisedimplementationplanregarding
certainoftheoperationaltopicsaddressedinthereport,includingaddressingcertainreliabilitymatters.ThePennsylvaniaCompanies
filedtheirrevisedimplementationplanincompliancewiththisorder.Afinalorderadoptingtheplan,asrevised,wasenteredon
November5,2015.ThecostofcomplianceforthePennsylvaniaCompaniesiscurrentlyexpectedtorangefromapproximately$200
millionto$230million.

OnJune19,2015,MEandPN,alongwithJCP&L,FETandMAITmadefilingswithFERC,theNJBPU,andthePPUCrequesting
authorizationforJCP&L,PNandMEtocontributetheirtransmissionassetstoMAIT,anewtransmissiononlysubsidiaryofFET.
EvidentiaryhearingsarescheduledtocommencebeforethePPUConFebruary29,2016.AfinaldecisionfromthePPUCisexpected
bymid2016.SeeTransferofTransmissionAssetstoMAITinFERCMattersbelowforfurtherdiscussionofthistransaction.

WESTVIRGINIA

MPandPEcurrentlyoperateunderaJointStipulationandAgreementofSettlementapprovedbytheWVPSConFebruary3,2015,
thatprovidedfor:a$15millionincreaseinannualbaseraterevenueseffectiveFebruary25,2015theimplementationofaVegetation
ManagementSurchargetorecoverallcostsrelatedtobothnewandexistingvegetationmaintenanceprogramsauthoritytoestablish
aregulatoryassetforMATSinvestmentsplacedintoservicein2016and2017authoritytodefer,amortizeandrecoveroverafive
yearperiodthroughbaseratesapproximately$46millionofstormrestorationcostsandeliminationoftheTTSforcostsassociated
withMP'sacquisitionoftheHarrisonplantinOctober2013andmovementofthosecostsintobaserates.

OnAugust14,2015,MPandPEfiledtheirannualENECcasewiththeWVPSCproposinganapproximate$165.1millionannual
increaseinrateseffectiveJanuary1,2016orbefore,whichwouldbea12.5%overallincreaseoverexistingrates.Theoriginal
proposedincreasewascomprisedofa$97millionunderrecoveredbalanceasofJune30,2015,aprojected$23.7millionunder
recoveryforthe2016calendaryear,andanactualunderrecoveredbalancefromMPandPE'sTTSforHarrisonPowerStationof
$44.4million.OnSeptember10,2015,MPandPEfiledanamendmentaddressingtheresultsoftherecentPJMTransitional
AuctionsforCapacityPerformance,whichresultedinanetdecreaseof$20.6millionfromtheinitialrequestedincreaseto$144.5
million.Asettlementwasreachedamongallthepartiesincreasingrevenues$96.9millionanddeferringothercostsforrecoveryinto
2017.ThesettlementwaspresentedtotheWVPSConNovember19,2015,andafinalorderapprovingthesettlementwithout
changeswasissuedonDecember22,2015,withrateseffectiveonJanuary1,2016.

OnAugust31,2015,MPandPEfiledwiththeWVPSCtheirbiennialpetitionforreconciliationoftheVegetationManagement
ProgramSurchargeandregularreviewoftheprogramproposinganapproximate$37.7millionannualincreaseinratesoveratwo
yearperiod,whichisa2.8%overallincreaseoverexistingrates.Theproposedincreasewascomprisedofa$2.1millionunder
recoveredbalanceasofJune30,2015,aprojected$23.9millioninunderrecoveryforthe2016/2017rateeffectiveperiod,and


121
recoveryofpreviouslyauthorizeddeferredvegetationmanagementcostsfromApril14,2014throughFebruary24,2015inthe
amountof$49.9million. Asettlementwasreachedamongallthepartiesincreasingrevenues$36.7millionannuallyforthe2016
2017twoyearraterecoveryperiod,andwaspresentedtotheWVPSConNovember19,2015.Afinalorderapprovingthesettlement
withoutchangeswasissuedonDecember21,2015,withrateseffectiveonJanuary1,2016.

RELIABILITYMATTERS

Federallyenforceablemandatoryreliabilitystandardsapplytothebulkelectricsystemandimposecertainoperating,recordkeeping
andreportingrequirementsontheUtilities,FES,AESupply,FG,FENOC,NG,ATSIandTrAIL.NERCistheEROdesignatedby
FERCtoestablishandenforcethesereliabilitystandards,althoughNERChasdelegateddaytodayimplementationandenforcement
ofthesereliabilitystandardstoeightregionalentities,includingRFC.AllofFirstEnergy'sfacilitiesarelocatedwithintheRFCregion.
FirstEnergyactivelyparticipatesintheNERCandRFCstakeholderprocesses,andotherwisemonitorsandmanagesitscompanies
inresponsetotheongoingdevelopment,implementationandenforcementofthereliabilitystandardsimplementedandenforcedby
RFC.

FirstEnergybelievesthatitisincompliancewithallcurrentlyeffectiveandenforceablereliabilitystandards.Nevertheless,inthe
course of operating its extensive electric utility systems and facilities, FirstEnergy occasionally learns of isolated facts or
circumstancesthatcouldbeinterpretedasexcursionsfromthereliabilitystandards.Ifandwhensuchoccurrencesarefound,
FirstEnergydevelopsinformationabouttheoccurrenceanddevelopsaremedialresponsetothespecificcircumstances,includingin
appropriatecases“selfreporting”anoccurrencetoRFC.Moreover,itisclearthatNERC,RFCandFERCwillcontinuetorefine
existingreliabilitystandardsaswellastodevelopandadoptnewreliabilitystandards.AnyinabilityonFirstEnergy'sparttocomply
withthereliabilitystandardsforitsbulkelectricsystemcouldresultintheimpositionoffinancialpenalties,andobligationstoupgrade
orbuildtransmissionfacilities,thatcouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectonitsfinancialcondition,resultsofoperationsandcash
flows.

FERCMATTERS

PJMTransmissionRates

PJManditsstakeholdershavebeendebatingthepropermethodtoallocatecostsfornewtransmissionfacilities.WhileFirstEnergy
andotherpartiesadvocateforatraditional"beneficiarypays"(orusagebased)approach,othersadvocatefor“socializing”thecosts
onaloadratiosharebasis,whereeachcustomerinthezonewouldpaybasedonitstotalusageofenergywithinPJM.Thisquestion
hasbeenthesubjectofextensivelitigationbeforeFERCandtheappellatecourts,includingbeforetheSeventhCircuit.OnJune25,
2014,adividedthreejudgepaneloftheSeventhCircuitruledthatFERChadnotquantifiedthebenefitsthatwesternPJMutilities
wouldderivefromcertainnew500kVorhigherlinesandthushadnotadequatelysupporteditsdecisiontosocializethecostsof
theselines.ThemajorityfoundthateasternPJMutilitiesaretheprimarybeneficiariesofthelines,whilewesternPJMutilitiesareonly
incidentalbeneficiaries,andthat,whileincidentalbeneficiariesshouldpaysomeshareofthecostsofthelines,thatshareshouldbe
proportionatetothebenefittheyderivefromthelines,andnotonloadratioshareinPJMasawhole.Thecourtremandedthecaseto
FERC,whichissuedanordersettingtheissueofcostallocationforhearingandsettlementproceedings.Settlementdiscussions
underaFERCappointedsettlementjudgeareongoing.

InaseriesofordersincertainOrderNo.1000dockets,FERCassertedthatthePJMtransmissionownersdonotholdanincumbent
“rightoffirstrefusal”toconstruct,ownandoperatetransmissionprojectswithintheirrespectivefootprintsthatareapprovedaspartof
PJM’sRTEPprocess.FirstEnergyandotherPJMtransmissionownershaveappealedtheserulings,andthequestionofwhether
FirstEnergyandthePJMtransmissionownershavea"rightoffirstrefusal"isnowpendingbeforetheU.S.CourtofAppealsforthe
D.C.CircuitinanappealofFERC'sorderapprovingPJM'sOrderNo.1000compliancefiling.

Theoutcomeoftheseproceedingsandtheirimpact,ifany,onFirstEnergycannotbepredictedatthistime.

RTORealignment

OnJune1,2011,ATSIandtheATSIzonetransferredfromMISOtoPJM.Whilemanyofthemattersinvolvedwiththemovehave
beenresolved,FERCdeniedrecoveryunderATSI'stransmissionrateforcertainchargesthatcollectivelycanbedescribedas"exit
fees"andcertainothertransmissioncostallocationchargestotalingapproximately$78.8millionuntilsuchtimeasATSIsubmitsa
cost/benefitanalysisdemonstratingnetbenefitstocustomersfromthetransfertoPJM.Subsequently,FERCrejectedaproposed
settlementagreementtoresolvetheexitfeeandtransmissioncostallocationissues,statingthatitsactioniswithoutprejudicetoATSI
submittingacost/benefitanalysisdemonstratingthatthebenefitsoftheRTOrealignmentdecisionsoutweightheexitfeeand
transmissioncostallocationcharges.FirstEnergy'srequestforrehearingofFERC'sorderrejectingthesettlementagreementremains
pending.

Separately,thequestionofATSI'sresponsibilityforcertaincostsforthe“MichiganThumb”transmissionprojectcontinuestobe
disputed.PotentialresponsibilityarisesundertheMISOMVPtariff,whichhasbeenlitigatedincomplexproceedingsbeforeFERC
andcertainUnitedStatesappellatecourts.OnOctober29,2015,FERCissuedanorderfindingthatATSIandtheATSIzonedonot
havetopayMISOMVPchargesfortheMichiganThumbtransmissionproject.MISOandtheMISOTOsfiledarequestforrehearing,
whichispendingatFERC.IntheeventofafinalnonappealableorderthatrulesthatATSImustpaythesecharges,ATSIwillseek