Allegheny Power 2015 Annual Report Download - page 140
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 140 of the 2015 Allegheny Power annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.
124
PJMMarketReform:PJMCapacityPerformanceProposal
InDecember2014,PJMsubmittedproposed“CapacityPerformance”reformsofitsRPMcapacityandenergymarkets.OnJune9,
2015,FERCissuedanorderconditionallyapprovingthebulkoftheproposedCapacityPerformancereformswithaneffectivedateof
April1,2015,anddirectedPJMtomakeacompliancefilingreflectingthemandateofFERC’sorder.OnJuly9,2015,severalparties,
includingFESConbehalfofcertainofitsaffiliates,submittedrequestsforrehearingforFERC'sJune9,2015order,andPJM
submitteditscompliancefilingasdirectedbytheorder.TherequestsforrehearingandPJM'scompliancefilingarependingbefore
FERC.
InAugustandSeptember2015,PJMconductedRPMauctionspursuanttothenewCapacityPerformancerules.FirstEnergy’snet
competitivecapacitypositionasaresultoftheBRAandCapacityPerformancetransitionauctionsisasfollows:
20162017
20172018
20182019*
Legacy
Obligation
Capacity
Performance
Legacy
Obligation
Capacity
Performance
Base
Generation
Capacity
Performance
(MW)
($/MWD)
(MW)
($/MWD)
(MW)
($/MWD)
(MW)
($/MWD)
(MW)
($/MWD)
(MW)
($/MWD)
ATSI
2,765
$114.23
4,210
$134.00
375
$120.00
6,245
$151.50
—
$149.98
6,245
$164.77
RTO
875
$59.37
3,675
$134.00
985
$120.00
3,565
$151.50
240
$149.98
3,930
$164.77
AllOther
Zones
135
$119.13
—
$134.00
150
$120.00
—
$151.50
35
**
20
**
3,775
7,885
1,510
9,810
275
10,195
*Approximately885MWsremainuncommittedforthe2018/2019deliveryyear.
**BaseGeneration:10MWsclearedat$200.21/MWDand25MWsclearedat$149.98/MWD.CapacityPerformance:5MWsclearedat
$215.00/MWDand15MWsclearedat$164.77/MWD.
PJMMarketReform:FERCOrderNo.745DR
OnMay23,2014,adividedthreejudgepaneloftheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.CircuitissuedanopinionvacatingFERC
Order No. 745, which required that, under certain parameters, DR participating in organized wholesale energy markets be
compensatedatLMP.ThemajorityconcludedthatDRisaretailservice,andthereforefallsunderstate,andnotfederal,jurisdiction,
andthatFERC,therefore,lacksjurisdictiontoregulateDR.ThemajorityalsofoundthatevenifFERChadjurisdictionoverDR,Order
No.745wouldbearbitraryandcapriciousbecause,underitsrequirements,DRwasinappropriatelyreceivingadoublepayment(LMP
plusthesavingsofforegoneenergypurchases).OnJanuary25,2016,theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtreversedtheopinionofthe
U.S.CourtofAppealsfortheD.C.Circuitandremandedforfurtheraction,findingFERChasstatutoryauthorityundertheFPAto
regulatecompensationofdemandresponseresourcesinFERCjurisdictionalwholesalepowermarkets.TheUnitedStatesSupreme
CourtalsoreversedtheholdingthatFERC'sOrderNo.745wasarbitraryandcapricious,findingthattheorderincludeddetailed
supportofthechosencompensationmethod.
OnMay23,2014,asamendedSeptember22,2014,FESC,onbehalfofitsaffiliateswithmarketbasedrateauthorization,fileda
complaintaskingFERCtoissueanorderrequiringtheremovalofallportionsofthePJMTariffallowingorrequiringDRtobeincluded
inthePJMcapacitymarket,witharefundeffectivedateofMay23,2014.FESCalsorequestedthattheresultsoftheMay2014PJM
BRAbeconsideredvoidandlegallyinvalidtotheextentthatDRclearedthatauctionbecausetheparticipationofDRinthatauction
wasunlawful.However,inlightoftheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt'sJanuary25,2016decisiondiscussedabove,onJanuary29,
2016,FESCwithdrewthecomplaint.
15.COMMITMENTS,GUARANTEESANDCONTINGENCIES
NUCLEARINSURANCE
ThePriceAndersonActlimitsthepublicliabilitywhichcanbeassessedwithrespecttoanuclearpowerplantto$13.5billion
(assuming103unitslicensedtooperate)forasinglenuclearincident,whichamountiscoveredby:(i)privateinsuranceamountingto
$375millionand(ii)$13.1billionprovidedbyanindustryretrospectiveratingplanrequiredbytheNRCpursuantthereto.Undersuch
retrospectiveratingplan,intheeventofanuclearincidentatanyunitintheUnitedStatesresultinginlossesinexcessofprivate
insurance,upto$127million(butnotmorethan$19millionperunitperyearintheeventofmorethanoneincident)mustbe
contributedforeachnuclearunitlicensedtooperateinthecountrybythelicenseesthereoftocoverliabilitiesarisingoutofthe
incident.Basedontheirpresentnuclearownershipandleaseholdinterests,FirstEnergy’smaximumpotentialassessmentunder
theseprovisionswouldbe$509million(NG$501million)perincidentbutnotmorethan$76million(NG$75million)inanyoneyear
foreachincident.
InadditiontothepublicliabilityinsuranceprovidedpursuanttothePriceAndersonAct,FirstEnergyhasalsoobtainedinsurance
coverageinlimitedamountsforeconomiclossandpropertydamagearisingoutofnuclearincidents.FirstEnergyisamemberof
NEIL,whichprovidescoverage(NEILI)fortheextraexpenseofreplacementpowerincurredduetoprolongedaccidentaloutagesof
nuclearunits.UnderNEILI,FirstEnergy’ssubsidiarieshavepolicies,renewableannually,correspondingtotheirrespectivenuclear
125
interests,whichprovideanaggregateindemnityofuptoapproximately$1.96billion(NG$1.93billion)forreplacementpowercosts
incurredduringanoutageafteraninitial20weekwaitingperiod.MembersofNEILIpayannualpremiumsandaresubjectto
assessmentsiflossesexceedtheaccumulatedfundsavailabletotheinsurer.FirstEnergy’spresentmaximumaggregateassessment
forincidentsatanycoverednuclearfacilityoccurringduringapolicyyearwouldbeapproximately$15million(NG$15million).
FirstEnergyisinsuredastoitsrespectivenuclearinterestsunderpropertydamageinsuranceprovidedbyNEILtotheoperating
companyforeachplant.Underthesearrangements,upto$2.75billionofcoveragefordecontaminationcosts,decommissioning
costs,debrisremovalandrepairand/orreplacementofpropertyisprovided.FirstEnergypaysannualpremiumsforthiscoverageand
isliableforretrospectiveassessmentsofuptoapproximately$83million(NG$81million).
FirstEnergyintendstomaintaininsuranceagainstnuclearrisksasdescribedaboveaslongasitisavailable.Totheextentthat
replacementpower,propertydamage,decontamination,decommissioning,repairandreplacementcostsandothersuchcostsarising
fromanuclearincidentatanyofFirstEnergy’splantsexceedthepolicylimitsoftheinsuranceineffectwithrespecttothatplant,to
theextentanuclearincidentisdeterminednottobecoveredbyFirstEnergy’sinsurancepolicies,ortotheextentsuchinsurance
becomesunavailableinthefuture,FirstEnergywouldremainatriskforsuchcosts.
TheNRCrequiresnuclearpowerplantlicenseestoobtainminimumpropertyinsurancecoverageof$1.06billionortheamount
generallyavailablefromprivatesources,whicheverisless.Theproceedsofthisinsurancearerequiredtobeusedfirsttoensurethat
thelicensedreactorisinasafeandstableconditionandcanbemaintainedinthatconditionsoastopreventanysignificantriskto
thepublichealthandsafety.Within30daysofstabilization,thelicenseeisrequiredtoprepareandsubmittotheNRCacleanupplan
forapproval.Theplanisrequiredtoidentifyallcleanupoperationsnecessarytodecontaminatethereactorsufficientlytopermitthe
resumptionofoperationsortocommencedecommissioning.Anypropertyinsuranceproceedsnotalreadyexpendedtoplacethe
reactorinasafeandstableconditionmustbeusedfirsttocompletethosedecontaminationoperationsthatareorderedbytheNRC.
FirstEnergyisunabletopredictwhateffecttheserequirementsmayhaveontheavailabilityofinsuranceproceeds.
GUARANTEESANDOTHERASSURANCES
FirstEnergyhasvariousfinancialandperformanceguarantees andindemnificationswhichareissuedinthenormalcourseof
business. These contracts include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and
indemnifications.FirstEnergyentersintothesearrangementstofacilitatecommercialtransactionswiththirdpartiesbyenhancingthe
valueofthetransactiontothethirdparty.
Asof December31,2015, outstandingguaranteesandotherassurancesaggregatedapproximately$3.7billion,consistingof
parentalguarantees($583million),subsidiaries'guarantees($2,137million),otherguarantees($300million)andotherassurances
($667million).
Ofthisaggregateamount,substantiallyallrelatestoguaranteesofwhollyownedconsolidatedentitiesofFirstEnergy.FES'debt
obligationsaregenerallyguaranteedbyitssubsidiaries,FGandNG,andFESguaranteesthedebtobligationsofeachofFGandNG.
Accordingly,presentandfutureholdersofindebtednessofFES,FG,andNGwouldhaveclaimsagainsteachofFES,FG,andNG,
regardlessofwhethertheirprimaryobligorisFES,FG,orNG.
COLLATERALANDCONTINGENTRELATEDFEATURES
Inthenormalcourseofbusiness,FEanditssubsidiariesroutinelyenterintophysicalorfinanciallysettledcontractsforthesaleand
purchaseofelectriccapacity,energy,fuelandemissionallowances.Certainbilateralagreementsandderivativeinstrumentscontain
provisionsthatrequireFEoritssubsidiariestopostcollateral.Thiscollateralmaybepostedintheformofcashorcreditsupportwith
thresholdscontingentuponFE'soritssubsidiaries'creditratingfromeachofthemajorcreditratingagencies.Thecollateraland
creditsupportrequirementsvarybycontractandbycounterparty.Theincrementalcollateralrequirementallowsfortheoffsettingof
assets and liabilities with the same counterparty, where the contractual right of offset exists under applicable master netting
agreements.
BilateralagreementsandderivativeinstrumentsenteredintobyFEanditssubsidiarieshavemarginingprovisionsthatrequireposting
ofcollateral.BasedonFES'powerportfolioexposureasofDecember31,2015,FEShaspostedcollateralof$188millionandAE
Supplyhaspostednocollateral.TheRegulatedDistributionsegmenthaspostedcollateralof$1million.
Thesecreditriskrelatedcontingentfeaturesstipulatethatifthesubsidiaryweretobedowngradedorloseitsinvestmentgradecredit
rating(basedonitsseniorunsecureddebtrating),itwouldberequiredtoprovideadditionalcollateral.Dependingonthevolumeof
forwardcontractsandfuturepricemovements,higheramountsformarginingcouldberequired.
SubsequenttotheoccurrenceofaseniorunsecuredcreditratingdowngradetobelowS&P'sBBBandMoody'sBaa3,ora“material
adverseevent,”theimmediatepostingofcollateraloracceleratedpaymentsmayberequiredofFEoritssubsidiaries.Thefollowing
tabledisclosestheadditionalcreditcontingentcontractualobligationsthatmayberequiredundercertaineventsasofDecember31,
2015: