Chesapeake Energy 2015 Annual Report Download - page 163

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 163 of the 2015 Chesapeake Energy annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 175

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION – (Continued)
159
During 2015, we sold 63 mmboe of proved reserves for approximately $97 million plus the cancellation of all of
CHK C-T’s outstanding preferred shares. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of
this report for further discussion of oil and natural gas property transactions. We recorded downward revisions of 885
mmboe, which was comprised of 1,098 mmboe decrease resulting primarily from lower oil, natural gas and NGL prices
in 2015, partially offset by 213 mmboe of upward revisions resulting from changes to previous estimates. The oil and
natural gas prices used in computing our reserves as of December 31, 2015 were $50.28 per bbl and $2.58 per mcf,
respectively, before price differentials.
During 2014, we acquired approximately 14 mmboe of proved reserves through purchases of oil and natural gas
properties for consideration of $168 million, and we sold 362 mmboe of proved reserves for approximately $4.7 billion.
We recorded downward revisions of 51 mmboe, which was comprised of a 78 mmboe reduction of previous estimates
partially offset by a 27 mmboe increase resulting primarily from higher natural gas prices in 2014. The oil and natural
gas prices used in computing our reserves as of December 31, 2014 were $94.98 per bbl and $4.35 per mcf, respectively,
before price differentials. Including the effect of price differential adjustments, the prices used in computing our reserves
as of December 31, 2014 were $89.09 per barrel of oil, $2.68 per mcf of natural gas and $24.10 per barrel of NGL.
During 2013, we acquired approximately 2 mmboe of proved reserves through purchases of oil and natural gas
properties for consideration of $22 million, and we sold 189 mmboe of proved reserves for approximately $1.621 billion.
During 2013, we recorded downward revisions of 30 mmboe to the December 31, 2012 estimates of our reserves.
Included in the revisions were 162 mmboe of upward revisions resulting from higher oil, natural gas and NGL prices
in 2013 and 192 mmboe of downward revisions resulting from changes to previous estimates. Higher prices increase
the economic lives of the underlying oil and natural gas properties and thereby increase the estimated future reserves.
The oil and natural gas prices used in computing our reserves as of December 31, 2013 were $96.82 per bbl and $3.67
per mcf, respectively, before price differentials. Including the effect of price differential adjustments, the prices used in
computing our reserves as of December 31, 2013 were $95.89 per barrel of oil, $2.37 per mcf of natural gas and $25.78
per barrel of NGL. Included in the non-price revisions were 355 mmboe of downward revisions to our estimated PUD
reserves, offset by 163 mmboe of upward revisions for performance.
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932 prescribes guidelines for computing a standardized measure of
future net cash flows and changes therein relating to estimated proved reserves. Chesapeake has followed these
guidelines which are briefly discussed below.
Future cash inflows and future production and development costs as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were
determined by applying the average of the first-day-of-the-month prices for the 12 months of the year and year-end
costs to the estimated quantities of oil, natural gas and NGL to be produced. Actual future prices and costs may be
materially higher or lower than the prices and costs used. For each year, estimates are made of quantities of proved
reserves and the future periods during which they are expected to be produced based on continuation of the economic
conditions applied for that year. Estimated future income taxes are computed using current statutory income tax rates
including consideration of the current tax basis of the properties and related carryforwards, giving effect to permanent
differences and tax credits. The resulting future net cash flows are reduced to present value amounts by applying a
10% annual discount factor.
The assumptions used to compute the standardized measure are those prescribed by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board and do not necessarily reflect our expectations of actual revenue to be derived from those reserves
nor their present worth. The limitations inherent in the reserve quantity estimation process, as discussed previously,
are equally applicable to the standardized measure computations since these estimates reflect the valuation process.