Huntington National Bank 2009 Annual Report Download - page 71

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 71 of the 2009 Huntington National Bank annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 220

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • 218
  • 219
  • 220

Durin
g
2009, portfolio reviews resulted in reclassifications of certain CRE loans to C&I loans. These net
reclassifications totaled
$
1.4 billion, and were primaril
y
associated with: (a) loans to businesses secured b
y
th
e
real estate and buildin
g
s that house their operations as these owner-occupied loans secured b
y
real estate were
underwritten based on the cash flow of the business, and (b) healthcare entities and colle
g
es and universities
.
We
b
e
li
eve t
h
at
l
oans un
d
erwr
i
tten
b
ase
d
on cas
hfl
ow
f
rom o
p
erat
i
ons s
h
ou
ld b
e cons
id
ere
d
as commerc
i
a
l
l
oans secure
dby
rea
l
estate, rat
h
er t
h
an t
h
e CRE port
f
o
li
ow
hi
c
hi
s rea
l
estate pro
j
ect or
i
ente
d
.
W
i
t
hi
nt
h
e CRE port
f
o
li
o, t
h
es
i
n
gl
e
f
am
ily h
ome
b
u
ild
er an
d
reta
il
propert
i
es se
g
ments cont
i
nue
d
to
be
stressed throu
g
hout 2009 as a result of the continued decline in the housin
g
markets and
g
eneral economic
conditions. As previousl
y
mentioned above, these se
g
ments were considered to be the hi
g
hest risk se
g
ments i
n
2009 w
i
t
hi
n our CRE
p
ort
f
o
li
o, an
d
are
di
scusse
df
urt
h
er
b
e
l
ow
.
S
in
gl
e Fami
ly
Home Bui
ld
ers
At December 31, 2009 we had
$
857 million of CRE loans to sin
g
le famil
y
home builders. Such loans
represented 2% of total loans and leases. Of this portfolio se
g
ment,
6
7% were to finance pro
j
ects currentl
y
under construction, 1
5
% to finance land under develo
p
ment, and 18% to finance land held for develo
p
ment
.
The $857 million re
p
resented a $732 million, or 46%, decrease com
p
ared with $1,589 million at December 31
,
2008. T
h
e
d
ecrease pr
i
mar
ily
re
fl
ecte
d
t
h
e rec
l
ass
ifi
cat
i
on o
fl
oans secure
dby
1-4
f
am
ily
res
id
ent
i
a
l
rea
l
estat
e
renta
l
propert
i
es to C&I
l
oans, cons
i
stent w
i
t
hi
n
d
ustr
y
pract
i
ces
i
nt
h
e
d
e
fi
n
i
t
i
on o
f
t
hi
sse
g
ment. Ot
h
e
r
factors contributin
g
to the decrease in exposure include no new ori
g
inations in this portfolio se
g
ment in 2009
,
increased propert
y
sale activit
y
, and substantial char
g
e-offs. The increased sale activit
y
was evident throu
g
hout
2009. Base
d
on t
h
e port
f
o
li
o mana
g
ement processes,
i
nc
l
u
di
n
g
c
h
ar
g
e-o
ff
act
i
v
i
t
y
, over t
h
e past 30 mont
h
s, w
e
believe that we have substantiall
y
addressed the credit issues in this portfolio. We do not expect an
y
futur
e
si
g
nificant credit impact from this portfolio se
g
ment
.
R
etai
l
Pro
p
erties
O
ur portfolio of CRE loans secured b
y
retail properties totaled $2,115 million, or approximatel
y
6% of
total loans and leases, at December 31, 2009. Loans within this portfolio se
g
ment declined
$
150 million, o
r
7%,
f
rom Decem
b
er 31, 2008. Cre
di
t approva
li
nt
hi
s port
f
o
li
ose
g
ment
i
s
g
enera
lly d
epen
d
ent on pre-
l
eas
i
n
g
requirements, and net operatin
g
income from the pro
j
ect must cover debt service b
y
specified percenta
g
e
s
w
h
en t
h
e
l
oan
i
s
f
u
lly f
un
d
e
d
.
Th
e wea
k
ness o
f
t
h
e econom
i
cenv
i
ronment
i
n our geograp
hi
c reg
i
ons s
i
gn
ifi
cant
l
y
i
mpacte
d
t
h
e pro
j
ects
t
h
at secure t
h
e
l
oans
i
nt
hi
s port
f
o
li
ose
g
ment. Lower occupanc
y
rates, re
d
uce
d
renta
l
rates,
i
ncrease
d
unemplo
y
ment levels compared with recent
y
ears, and the expectation that these levels will continue t
o
increase for the foreseeable future are expected to adversel
y
affect our borrowers’ abilit
y
to repa
y
these loans
.
We
h
ave
i
ncrease
d
t
h
e
l
eve
l
o
f
cre
di
tr
i
s
k
mana
g
ement act
i
v
i
t
y
to t
hi
s port
f
o
li
ose
g
ment, an
d
we ana
ly
ze ou
r
reta
il
propert
yl
oans
i
n
d
eta
il by
com
bi
n
i
n
g
propert
y
t
y
pe,
g
eo
g
rap
hi
c
l
ocat
i
on, tenants, an
d
ot
h
er
d
ata, t
o
assess and mana
g
e our credit concentration risks.
Core and Noncore port
f
olio
s
Each CRE loan is classified as either core or noncore. We se
g
mented the CRE portfolio into thes
e
desi
g
nations in order to provide more clarit
y
around our portfolio mana
g
ement strate
g
ies and to provide
a
ddi
t
i
ona
l
c
l
ar
i
t
yf
or our
i
nvestors. A CRE
l
oan
i
s
g
enera
lly
cons
id
ere
d
core w
h
en t
h
e
b
orrower
i
sa
n
exper
i
ence
d
,we
ll
-cap
i
ta
li
ze
dd
eve
l
oper
i
n our M
id
west
f
ootpr
i
nt, an
dh
as e
i
t
h
er an esta
bli
s
h
e
d
mean
i
n
gf
u
l
relationship or the prospective of establishin
g
one, that
g
enerates an acceptable return on capital. The core
CRE portfolio was
$
4.0 billion at December 31, 2009, representin
g
52% of total CRE loans. Persona
l
g
uarantees support approximatel
y
9
5
% of this portfolio. Based on the extensive pro
j
ect level assessmen
t
process,
i
nc
l
u
di
n
gf
orwar
d
-
l
oo
ki
n
g
co
ll
atera
l
va
l
uat
i
ons, we are com
f
orta
bl
ew
i
t
h
t
h
e cre
di
t qua
li
t
y
o
f
t
h
e cor
e
p
ortfolio at this time.
A CRE loan is
g
enerall
y
considered noncore based on a lack of a substantive relationship outside of th
e
credit product, with no immediate prospects for improvement. The noncore CRE portfolio totaled
$
3.7 billio
n
63